pros and cons?
bump springs
Collapse
X
-
-
everybody has told me to stay away from them, but in my mind they seem more consistent for what im fighting than rubbers or bump stops do. ive got an older bwrc that drives great with the car laid on the rf, but its a fine line to bottoming the ball joint in the shock
Comment
-
riddle28: Why don't you just update/move the Upper coilover mount so it doesn't hit? The car should bottom out before this hits on any newer car. Maybe it's not possible on your car is built and how things are set up, but that would be the first thing I'd do......
Also not a fan of bump springs, but there are newer ones out there the might solve some of the issues but I don't feel they are enough for me to actually test any of it. Again just my personal preference, don't mean it's right or wrong just different.
Comment
-
The force released is the spring rate over the distance. Springs are linear so rate is always the same. Bumps depend where you are in the travel.Originally posted by Len72P View Postis there a different rate of release of the stored energy, between the bump spring and bump stop, and does that effect shock rebound?Modern Day Spec Wedge Racing
Comment
-
-
I think you need to also look at force/travel over time. Meaning say you had a bump that was indeed linear just for ease of discussion. Lets say it's a 200# rate so take that bump and a 200# spring and compress both 1" or 200# of load.Originally posted by Burke1118 View PostDo you think the hysteresis of foam/urethane is note worthy?
Now release both of them, what is the time difference to come back up 1"? Then how much spring surge does the spring have at that velocity and how much is that effecting the static load on the spring as it will drop momentarily and increase then slowly stabilize over time depending how bad the surge is. Not sure how much a bump can actually surge but it's got to be a huge amount less then a spring.
Say the spring rebounds 1" in .002 seconds and the bump at twice as slow at 1" in .004 seconds, if the car/coiliover is traveling 1" in .003 seconds then the spring is pushing on the car but not so much with the bump.
Hope that makes sense.
Comment
-
So what you’re saying is, if you compressed a 200# small bump spring, and a 200# regular coil over both 1â€, then magically were able to make what was compressing the spring vanish and you were able to time how long before both springs rebounded the inch the coil spring would resume quicker?Originally posted by billetbirdcage View PostI think you need to also look at force/travel over time. Meaning say you had a bump that was indeed linear just for ease of discussion. Lets say it's a 200# rate so take that bump and a 200# spring and compress both 1" or 200# of load.Now release both of them, what is the time difference to come back up 1"? Then how much spring surge does the spring have at that velocity and how much is that effecting the static load on the spring as it will drop momentarily and increase then slowly stabilize over time depending how bad the surge is. Not sure how much a bump can actually surge but it's got to be a huge amount less then a spring.Say the spring rebounds 1" in .002 seconds and the bump at twice as slow at 1" in .004 seconds, if the car/coiliover is traveling 1" in .003 seconds then the spring is pushing on the car but not so much with the bump. Hope that makes sense.
Comment
-
Comment
-
If that is all your after, then look at either the 1/2" tall RSW series bumps or the Apollo series bumps. Pick one medium to hard and just shim with packers until the arm just misses the shock without the spring on it. Just leave a little room for compression on the bump but with those styles you only talking 3/16" or 1/4" at most depending on which one you pick.Originally posted by riddle28 View Postive got an 09, the upper shock bolt is ran thru a tube in the upper bar. it really gives me the most travel out of any other way i see. im just trying to come up with something as a "soft" limiter say a 1/4" before the BJ hits
Comment
Comment