03 rocket tight on entry

[steelkiwi75]

375 rf 500 lf 250 rr 200 lr. Integra ida base 03 rocket settings. .bars in base holes. What do I do to loosen? Thanks

[jedclampit]

375 rf 500 lf 250 rr 200 lr. Integra ida base 03 rocket settings. .bars in base holes. What do I do to loosen? Thanks

Try a pair of 225's across the rear.......... or swap the current springs left to right for a very noticeable change.

or

Crank some bite in it, add rebound to lr shock.

or

Raise the rr lower bar up @ frame,(something I never do, some places and people like it)



Many ways to go, some vary directly with corner exit handling, some inversely.Depends what you want.

[hpmaster]

Try a softer LF spring, like a 450 or 425, this what I try first because it seems to work well in my experiance. As jed said lots of ways to go.

[Matt49]

Try a softer LF spring, like a 450 or 425, this what I try first because it seems to work well in my experiance. As jed said lots of ways to go.

This is also what I would try first. Maybe even a 475. Depends on how far you want to go with it or how tight you really are now.

[keeks]

How about real basic. What RR tire pressure you running?

[steelkiwi75]

10 lbs rr 12 lbs rf 8 lbs lf 6 lbs lr

[matt8]

If that is a black front end change right rear to 225 and drop rf down till starts to turn in if track is smooth 300 would not be out of the question

[7uptruckracer]

If that is a black front end change right rear to 225 and drop rf down till starts to turn in if track is smooth 300 would not be out of the question

Its a 2003 Unless its got the raised Rail updated which started 2004 can't cant really run softer then a 350 without risking the rail hitting the track.....

[hex8320]

Have you ever messed around with the anti-dive?

[drtrkr244]

According to my Rocket set-up book, you should have a 250lr, 225rr.

Also, be sure right side radius rods are 18.75".

This should loosen you up a fair amount.

[hpmaster]

Have you ever messed around with the anti-dive?

Anti dive, most often done by changing the angle of an upper control mounting points, the front higher than the rear adds "anti dive". I have worked with it on both the right and left with mixed results, but do not forget you are basicly mechanicaly limiting or locking up the suspension with the most anti dive under braking first. Until you have a handle on what the suspension is doing set as designed you need to be careful. JMHO

[Matt49]

Anti-dive is completely dependent on braking forces/torgue. If you don't use much front brake it won't have much effect.
In most cases on dirt cars we are looking to keep the front suspension moving as free as possible so that the high dollar shocks can do their thing. My personal opinion is that introducing additional mechanical loading (e.g. anti-dive) is counterproductive. Pretty much every dirt late model front end out there today is designed with NO anti-dive...probably a reason for that.

[hpmaster]

Anti-dive is completely dependent on braking forces/torgue. If you don't use much front brake it won't have much effect.
In most cases on dirt cars we are looking to keep the front suspension moving as free as possible so that the high dollar shocks can do their thing. My personal opinion is that introducing additional mechanical loading (e.g. anti-dive) is counterproductive. Pretty much every dirt late model front end out there today is designed with NO anti-dive...probably a reason for that.

Agreed, thanks for adding and clarifying. Adding too much anti dive can turn a race car with a $5000.00 front suspension into a dart under braking. ie 1970 Dodge Dart LOL.

[7uptruckracer]

Plus most drivers trail brake its holding it in a bind. I have seen some pro-dive on some chassis

[MM90]

Are you on or off throttle tight entry?