Rocket Wide Right Front ?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RacerX10
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2007
    • 571

    #1

    Rocket Wide Right Front ?

    Sooooo ...

    I bought a 2010 Rocket (haven't picked it up yet) but it's advertised as a "blue/gray with wide right front".

    What exactly is the "wide right front" part, (how is it different than non-wide) and what are the ups and downs of that option ?


    Thanks !
  • Dirtmod13
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2014
    • 245

    #2
    Originally posted by RacerX10 View Post
    Sooooo ... I bought a 2010 Rocket (haven't picked it up yet) but it's advertised as a "blue/gray with wide right front".What exactly is the "wide right front" part, (how is it different than non-wide) and what are the ups and downs of that option ?Thanks !
    I just bought one and owner told me it has 2 holes for rf lower control arm so u can move it out another inch wider. Don't know if that's all though. Still trying to find answers on mine too

    Comment

    • rickhulson
      Junior Member
      • Oct 2014
      • 21

      #3
      most people run it wide but you can move it in to free it up but you also need the double slot rack eye on right front

      Comment

      • RacerX10
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2007
        • 571

        #4
        From the pictures I can see it's got two holes in the RF upper shock mount .. can't tell anything else from the picture though.

        Comment

        • 7uptruckracer
          Senior Member
          • May 2009
          • 1336

          #5
          Sweet sells a dual mount right shock eye for the wide cars too thought it was neat or you can get the slotted one.

          Comment

          • zerolm
            Senior Member
            • Dec 2007
            • 135

            #6
            I had a '10 and they told me to always run the shock in the inner hole (Closest to engine) regardless of whether you had the RF in or out. I just got my '14 a few months ago with the same option and there is only one shock mount on it, in the "inner" position..

            Comment

            • RacerX10
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2007
              • 571

              #7
              Good to know, thanks zerolm

              Comment

              • BigNilla
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2014
                • 180

                #8
                I'm not a racer... Yet, but running the shock on inner holeakes sense. If you don't change the length of everything else. May prevent binding and allow freeer movement of the shock. Seems like you would need to change arm length to gain any true benefit from an outwart shock mount location. Correct?

                Comment

                • Matt49
                  Senior Member
                  • Jun 2007
                  • 3123

                  #9
                  Originally posted by BigNilla View Post
                  I'm not a racer... Yet, but running the shock on inner holeakes sense. If you don't change the length of everything else. May prevent binding and allow freeer movement of the shock. Seems like you would need to change arm length to gain any true benefit from an outwart shock mount location. Correct?
                  Moving the location on the lower control arm changes the motion ratio which has a drastic effect on wheel rate (spring rate felt at the tire contact patch).

                  Comment

                  • RacerX10
                    Senior Member
                    • Jun 2007
                    • 571

                    #10
                    So it sounds like there isn't any downside to it being "wide" .. just put it out there and leave it ?

                    Comment

                    • 7uptruckracer
                      Senior Member
                      • May 2009
                      • 1336

                      #11
                      Entry Tightness

                      Comment

                      • Bcollins82
                        Senior Member
                        • Jul 2009
                        • 322

                        #12
                        Originally posted by BigNilla View Post
                        I'm not a racer... Yet, but running the shock on inner holeakes sense. If you don't change the length of everything else. May prevent binding and allow freeer movement of the shock. Seems like you would need to change arm length to gain any true benefit from an outwart shock mount location. Correct?
                        Leaving the upper shock mount in the inner hole when moving everything else outward has nothing to do with binding or arm length. It simply makes the RF spring act more progressively as the car rolls and travels on the RF.

                        Comment

                        • BigNilla
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2014
                          • 180

                          #13
                          Oh I understand sorry my phone and my thumbs don't get along lol.

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X