sweet rack

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dfhotlm33c
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2011
    • 224

    #1

    sweet rack

    Car came with sweet rack, external servo. Rack has a "3" stamped in front of big fitting at front. Is that a 3:1? If so, is that too slow? Also, how do I determine what valving the servo is?
  • Matt49
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2007
    • 3123

    #2
    Originally posted by dfhotlm33c View Post
    Car came with sweet rack, external servo. Rack has a "3" stamped in front of big fitting at front. Is that a 3:1? If so, is that too slow? Also, how do I determine what valving the servo is?
    It's driver preference but 3:1 is too low for me and most I would say. You'll have your hands full if the car gets out from under you with at 3:1 rack.

    Comment

    • Brian Gray
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2012
      • 1102

      #3
      I believe the 3 means 3in per turn. A very popular dirt rate is 4.19 per turn.

      Most racks are measured in inches of slide travel per turn
      Shocks by BGR army

      Comment

      • rakracing
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2014
        • 218

        #4
        both sweet racks I have are 3 stamp and I know there 1-1/2 turns lock to lock, I believe there numbered 1 to 4 for speed, and the servo numbers i've had .185, .220, .235 which is the feel. I don't remember but I think the higher the number the softer the feel, I now I liked the .220 the best for feel.

        Comment

        • hucktyson
          Banned
          • May 2007
          • 1903

          #5
          Rack numbers are expressed in " inches per turn " a 3" would be fine if u you had a Rayburn with 3.5" steering arms on the spindles but super slow on a masters or rocket with 5" steering arms. The servo numbers refer to the thickness of the torsion bar in the rack. When you twist the torsion bar it directs fluid to the opposite side you are turning to help force the wheels that direction. The higher that number the thicker the bar which will require more effort to turn the wheels.

          Comment

          • dfhotlm33c
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2011
            • 224

            #6
            I see. I guess I'm not sure then. It's an 01 Masters. Uses a 13" tube on LF, and 15" tube on RF for steering, if that's what you are referring to.

            Comment

            • hucktyson
              Banned
              • May 2007
              • 1903

              #7
              Measure from the center of the lower ball joint to the center of the hole where the steering link attaches. That is the steering arm. If it's a masters it's prob 5" in which case a 3" rack would be very slow.

              Comment

              • keeks
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2008
                • 687

                #8
                Could you use a quickener with a slower rack?

                Comment

                • Brian Gray
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2012
                  • 1102

                  #9
                  I don't see why not but it's prolly cheaper to just get the speed changed.
                  Shocks by BGR army

                  Comment

                  • dfhotlm33c
                    Senior Member
                    • Apr 2011
                    • 224

                    #10
                    Well isn't that interesting...we have a 2:1 Howe quickener, but would that actually make it so that I get 6" to one turn? That would be outrageous I imagine.

                    We do have a 3.6 Appleton rack on the old car. Will probably just swap them (Same center to center)

                    Comment

                    • fastford
                      Senior Member
                      • Dec 2008
                      • 4059

                      #11
                      if you put that Appleton on there , be sure to check your bump steer, every time ive switched one way or the other, I had to readjust for bump.

                      Comment

                      • hucktyson
                        Banned
                        • May 2007
                        • 1903

                        #12
                        The fastest rack on the market is a 4.5 and that's lighting fast and a 3.0 is brutally slow so yes a 6.0 but be undriveable

                        Comment

                        • drtrkr244
                          Banned
                          • Dec 2007
                          • 1024

                          #13
                          Theres a interesting tech article on Sweets website. It shows a table with rack ratio on the side and steering arm length across the top. Then it shows the final ratio, based on those criteria, which is a lot higher than most realize.

                          Comment

                          • rakracing
                            Senior Member
                            • Dec 2014
                            • 218

                            #14
                            I would recommend you just run what you got and see how you like it, to many guys speed up there steering and then complain the car has a push on entry, which is usually caused by over steering in. a 3 is plenty quick, and the servo number, to soft you can steer with one finger but cant feel the track, to hard it can be tough on the arms. you have to see what you like first.

                            Comment

                            • dfhotlm33c
                              Senior Member
                              • Apr 2011
                              • 224

                              #15
                              Ok, so this is for a small 1/3 mile, tight turn, relatively flat track. Max speed entering corners about 90. Don't know if that has any effect on if you think a 3 would suffice. But, I am inclined to take that advice and see what happens.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X