Cambered rr

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • fastcar
    Member
    • May 2008
    • 57

    #1

    Cambered rr

    Seen some talks about clambering the rr. Thought about it a couple years ago but seem to hear more about it now. Are guys doing it? Is it that much of and advantage? How many degrees and what all needs to be changed to do it?

    Thanks
  • Matt49
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2007
    • 3123

    #2
    We're already cambering both rear tires using stagger...food for thought.
    Cambering the way most people talk about it requires a different axle tube and a different driver plate to allow for the misalignment of the axle itself in the splines. Strange Oval makes such a drive flange and they are really proud of them.

    Comment

    • fastford
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2008
      • 4059

      #3
      matt is right, the only time we ran a cambered rt rear was when we were not running hardly any stagger....

      Comment

      • RacerX10
        Senior Member
        • Jun 2007
        • 571

        #4
        Had that on my Rayburn back in the late 90's. Totally not worth bothering with, but I still have the setup for both L and R cambered if you wanna make me an offer, I'll ship it to ya !

        Comment

        • Matt49
          Senior Member
          • Jun 2007
          • 3123

          #5
          On but also off topic. Has anyone ever considered the possibility of running TOE in the rear using a "cambered" axle tube. I've given this quite a bit of thought in the past and his thread has re-kindled my interest.

          Comment

          • RacerX10
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2007
            • 571

            #6
            Originally posted by Matt49 View Post
            On but also off topic. Has anyone ever considered the possibility of running TOE in the rear using a "cambered" axle tube. I've given this quite a bit of thought in the past and his thread has re-kindled my interest.
            I can't figure out why nobody has built a DLM with independent rear suspension.

            Comment

            • Matt49
              Senior Member
              • Jun 2007
              • 3123

              #7
              Originally posted by RacerX10 View Post
              I can't figure out why nobody has built a DLM with independent rear suspension.
              From a practicality standpoint, my guess is more moving parts means less reliability. And I could also imagine the entire thing increasing overall weight but I'm not sure.

              From a rules standpoint, see Lucas Oil rule 12.14.F and UMP rule 15.1.4.C.

              Comment

              • MasterSbilt_Racer
                Senior Member
                • May 2007
                • 14324

                #8
                Originally posted by RacerX10 View Post
                I can't figure out why nobody has built a DLM with independent rear suspension.
                It is not legal. Used to be in wissota though.
                Modern Day Spec Wedge Racing

                Comment

                • #71
                  Junior Member
                  • Jan 2014
                  • 5

                  #9
                  Over here we ran a cambered RR deal on our modified. It did give us 3 tenths, but we also didnt run any more than 1" of stagger.The kit we used was from an Australia company called 'Race Products' We dont seem to need it on a late model though. I'dsay because of the 5-6 inches of stagger, the inside edge of the rr tyre is loaded already.
                  Last edited by #71; 01-12-2016, 07:58 PM.

                  Comment

                  • fastford
                    Senior Member
                    • Dec 2008
                    • 4059

                    #10
                    I know some one years ago that ran a negative cambered left rear to get inside side bite on the left rear, never saw any speed though.....
                    Last edited by fastford; 01-13-2016, 09:54 AM.

                    Comment

                    • RacerX10
                      Senior Member
                      • Jun 2007
                      • 571

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Matt49 View Post
                      From a practicality standpoint, my guess is more moving parts means less reliability. And I could also imagine the entire thing increasing overall weight but I'm not sure.

                      From a rules standpoint, see Lucas Oil rule 12.14.F and UMP rule 15.1.4.C.

                      Well there ya go ... thanks Matt !

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X