I have seen shocks mounted many ways. Is there a right and a wrong way? Guess not, but I do believe there is an efficient and less efficient way. You pay lots of money for good shocks, so why dont make them work for you the best they can? Mounted inboard on the arm, close to stock will give the shock the least amount of travel, lets say 1.5 inch. Why not mount the bottom of the shock as close to the lower ball joint as you can, and the top of the shock as vertical as you can (without causing a tire rub) this way it is the most efficient and has the most travel (3.5") and works the best for you. You pay the money, make them work for you! I want as much control as I can get, not the least. Have cars won races with shocks mounted all over the place? Sure, and they will continue to. But if you are redoing the mounts, make those shocks work for you! I like an adjustable clamp on upper mount off of the front hoop bar for the top of the shock. That way you can adjust them to keep from rubbing on the tire, and I weld the lower mount as close to the lower balljoint as I can, and mount the shock off the front of the lower arm. Just my .02
dave.
dave.

Comment