Exhaust scavenging

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • A.Pinto
    Member
    • Aug 2007
    • 50

    #1

    Exhaust scavenging

    When tuning for tailpipe length for proper exhaust scavenging, is it possible to measure a intake manifold vacuum improvement? Also is the cast iron tri-yi manifold worth the hp/weight over the ranger tube manifold? ? 84Dave/JBV/Rob

    TIA
    It's always the crew chiefs fault.......
  • 84Dave
    Senior Member
    • May 2007
    • 915

    #2
    Measuring intake manifold vacuum? To be precise in the measurement, because induction character 'pulses', your standard $20 vacuum gauge won't do the job. It essentially 'averages' everything. It would require high sample-speed instrumentation for precise measurements. However....... if you switched or tested exhaust manifolds and there was a measurable/moderate difference in vacuum with your $20 gauge, something would be amiss between exhaust manifolds. Good or bad.

    For those on this forum that may not know........... if you're working with exhaust systems, I HIGHLY recommend Larry Meaux's PipeMax software program. About $35 + shipping on a CD. Some of the cheapest/best $$$ you'll ever spend on your race engine. Check it out @ www.maxracesoftware.com . And if you have upfront questions, larrymeaux@cox.net. Some of you may remember when I started a thread on this Forum entitled 'Induction/Exhaust Tuning'. The formuli I used in that screed belonged to Dr. Gordon Blair of Blair & Associates out of PA. With all of the right inputs to Larry's PipeMax software, the recommended length/diameter results were very close to identical between my formuli & Larry's software. And Larry's software obviously does all the 'heavy lifting' calculations in milli-seconds! Versus my pad of legal paper, a calculator, & pen. BTW...... whether you use Blair's formuli or Meaux's software, be prepared to measure the INDUCTION tract lengths. Get the measurements wrong between the induction and calculated exhaust dimensions, & it'll cost you 27#torque/25HP in a heartbeat on a 262HP 2344cc Ford! Make you think I've been there....... done that?? -Dave-

    Comment

    • soonersublime
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2008
      • 995

      #3
      To answer the question about whether a tri-y or a ranger tube manifold would be better I would bet 3 out of 4 times the tri-y would win that battle if not always. For the money though there are better headers out there. Not sure where any more but there is a guy on here who designs em and sells em from up north. He has a website you might try googling something to find him if he doesn't speak up.

      Comment

      • crcltrakr
        Senior Member
        • May 2007
        • 293

        #4
        Headers

        Here is one supplier......

        JerryM

        Comment

        • Racedad
          Senior Member
          • May 2007
          • 340

          #5
          X2 with PipeMax.You won't believe how much capability there is for the price.This is no cheap crap software deal. Well worth the $$.

          Comment

          • A.Pinto
            Member
            • Aug 2007
            • 50

            #6
            I can't use a header. I do own pipemax. Collector length of 38.1" on my set up. It's that the measuring starting point on the collector is iffy on a stock manifold, and measuring a bent piece of piping (from manifold to muffler) is questionable at best. I was just thinking of a way to get closer without a trip to a dyno. Not easy or cost effective to keep testing pipe lengths on a chassis dyno.
            It's always the crew chiefs fault.......

            Comment

            Working...
            X