Soft Front Springs

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • shaunsracing36
    Junior Member
    • Jan 2009
    • 27

    #1

    Soft Front Springs

    Does anyone have any experience with soft front spring setups for dirt modifieds? I am seeing companies like Swift, Hyperco, and others with new 350 - 450 front springs options. Has anyone tried these options with success? Are they doing RF and LF soft or just RF?
    Attached Files
  • fastford
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2008
    • 4059

    #2
    a lot of it has to do with the rules , our new mod rules say no bump stops of any kind , so unless you are going to run with coil bind , which i dont like but i will , then you must run a stiffer spring....

    Comment

    • rimrider19k
      Member
      • Jul 2007
      • 60

      #3
      They don't play nice with rough race tracks as your running on a bump stop.

      Comment

      • Havoc5
        Junior Member
        • Nov 2017
        • 8

        #4
        Couldn't you have a higher static load and achieve the same drive from a 400 spring as you can with a 600? Referring to the right front spring.

        Comment

        • Jeremy Queener
          Junior Member
          • Nov 2016
          • 22

          #5
          The lighter springs are a new common. Coil bind or control arm hitting the frame is a normal with rates this light. Eibach makes the fronts down into the 200 lbs/in, however, I have not seen anyone in the 200's yet for a modified.
          Jeremy Queener- Eibach Springs

          Comment

          • TwistedFrame21
            Member
            • Oct 2012
            • 54

            #6
            Originally posted by Jeremy Queener View Post
            The lighter springs are a new common. Coil bind or control arm hitting the frame is a normal with rates this light. Eibach makes the fronts down into the 200 lbs/in, however, I have not seen anyone in the 200's yet for a modified.
            So when going from a 550 rf, to say a 400, do I need run a higher static load or ride height rather, in the rf?

            Comment

            • Racer96m
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2008
              • 425

              #7
              Originally posted by TwistedFrame21 View Post
              So when going from a 550 rf, to say a 400, do I need run a higher static load or ride height rather, in the rf?
              I think you need to pay more attention to a 3 in compression load number when making that spring swap. Ultimately you still have to keep that frame rail off the ground. The spring change is just going to determine how fast you get to that dynamic number, but yes the 400 would have a higher static ride height but make the transition to the 3in number quicker than the 550.

              Dave
              2012 UMP Stock Car National Champions.
              2013 UMP Modified Rookie of the Year
              2014 Kankakee Speedway UMP Modified Champion
              2016 Fairbury American Legion Speedway UMP Modified Champion
              2016 Kankakee Speedway UMP Modified Champion
              2016 UMP Modified, Northen IL Regional Champion
              2018 UMP Modified, #2 National Points Standings
              Like us on Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/McKinneyMotorsports

              Comment

              Working...
              X