Originally posted by qrteracer
View Post
straight stub vs turned stub
Collapse
X
-
Instead of the spring mounted on the birdcage behind the axle, it is mounted on a bracket clamped to the axle tube in front.
-
You must have gotten a special one....lol 1 1/2to 2 inches is what i've measured and thats the total wheelbase bottom balljoint to rearend but i'm kinda get old and I may have forgotten to wear my glasses...lolOriginally posted by anissa5 View PostI thought pierce cars where turned 3/4 i know some that are turned more then that
Comment
-
Most turned stub cars are in the neighborhood of 1 3/4" to 2". I would not call 3/4" turned. Most of the time if it is turned 3/4" that would make it almost straight up (On the chevelle stub) at least. The Chevelle from the factory was built with the RF behind the LF.Curious that we spend more time congratulating people who have succeeded than encouraging people who have not.
Comment
-
I like a little wedge , and my stub straight.
The Blacksheep cometh ! With old bent sh!t that just keeps getting faster !
Comment
-
thats what I've always heard...Originally posted by not clamped up View PostYou must have gotten a special one....lol 1 1/2to 2 inches is what i've measured and thats the total wheelbase bottom balljoint to rearend but i'm kinda get old and I may have forgotten to wear my glasses...lol
Comment
-
I can't see the speed advantage. I think If I was building a chassis for the masses. I may turn the stub to make the car more drivable for inexpieranced drivers. In the sixties they moved the right front back to get it to turn. In the eighties they moved back the left front to get it to turn. Now they are turning the stub? Educate me on this. I have built many good cars. Never did this, don't think I will. I just may be a slow learner. Show me the advantage. A day without learning, is a day wasted!
Comment
-
turned stub = lr behind the rfOriginally posted by Graff Spee View PostI can't see the speed advantage. I think If I was building a chassis for the masses. I may turn the stub to make the car more drivable for inexpieranced drivers. In the sixties they moved the right front back to get it to turn. In the eighties they moved back the left front to get it to turn. Now they are turning the stub? Educate me on this. I have built many good cars. Never did this, don't think I will. I just may be a slow learner. Show me the advantage. A day without learning, is a day wasted!
Thats the way theyve been doing it forever to turn left.
Theres nothing to explain the inside radius of a track is smaller, your cars track width is 65 or so wide, the outide and inside footprint are two different diameter circles around the track.
Comment
-
turning the stub 1/2 to 3/4" pretty much just allows the front tires to be square with each other after caster is set. There are plenty of cars that run up front in all venues with stubs that are turned...likewise there are plenty with stubs that are 3/4" turned down to 0" turned that run up front as well.
...like a few others have said...driver preference.
Comment
-
My thinking tells me that the rear of the car gets its roll out from stagger. It also has induced roll over steer in some cases. I see the front end as bieng two wheels that are not bound by stagger issues. They roll independant of each other. They do not know if they are turning or what. As long as the toe and the ackerman are working properly, how would a shorter left side of an inch or so make a change?
Comment
-
Now that makes more sense to me. I may be a bit slow, but I do catch on. Thank you!Originally posted by missile07 View PostI have always been told to think of it as a steiger tractor that swivels in the center. The wheels never actually turn...one side gets shorter when a turn is needed.
Comment
-
Another CRUTCH .......... All I am sayin !
The Blacksheep cometh ! With old bent sh!t that just keeps getting faster !
Comment
-
Comment