metric clip springs

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • willyj
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2007
    • 116

    #1

    metric clip springs

    what spring split to use on metric clip 4/4 rear? I understand the r.f. with metric lowers will prob be 1050. Previous owner suggested 200-300 lb. split and builder is retired or out of bizz. Just cant see using over 100 lb. of split. Car tends to be loose in w/850lf-1050rf.Am i missing something about all metric front ends?
  • Kojak_9x
    Senior Member
    • May 2007
    • 179

    #2
    I've always heard people say they run heavy springs like that but have never actually seen it on any of my buddys cars! I run a RF 650 LF 700 in all the metric mods ive ever owned/drove. Ive been down to 600 on the RF but didnt like it with a tie down shock. The biggest thing i noticed with the springs/metric 4/4 im running is to have the LF 125-150 lbs heavier on the scales. Im by far not a pro but this helped me out. Good luck!

    Comment

    • Racer111
      Senior Member
      • May 2007
      • 796

      #3
      I havent seen a car with metric lowers for years.With the nova lowers springs run from 550-850..

      Comment

      • willyj
        Senior Member
        • Dec 2007
        • 116

        #4
        Thanks for the replies but it already bottoms out a 1050 now. I understand nova lowers are different. Was hoping someone who ran true all metric could shed some light on this application. Yeah I hear some chevelle guys run stiffer on the lf,just looking to, better this car.

        Comment

        • Kojak_9x
          Senior Member
          • May 2007
          • 179

          #5
          If ur bottoming out with that much spring u either have a spring that is shot or ur ride hights r way too low! What r ur ride hights and where do u measure? Also measure from the ground to ur lower front control arm bolt. Ill try to help u out. I run an all metric front end just cause i have tons of parts! Also what ball joints do u run?

          Comment

          • willyj
            Senior Member
            • Dec 2007
            • 116

            #6
            Originally posted by Kojak_9x View Post
            If ur bottoming out with that much spring u either have a spring that is shot or ur ride hights r way too low! What r ur ride hights and where do u measure? Also measure from the ground to ur lower front control arm bolt. Ill try to help u out. I run an all metric front end just cause i have tons of parts! Also what ball joints do u run?
            Measure from top of lower c/a to the bottom of spring bucket on frame. 3.5" rf 3.0" lf. Unsure of balljoint as they came in car,haven't verified exactly what heights. RoushYates springs checked and rated doubt any trouble with those! Rf spring rubber has solved bottoming i would like to check ride ht up to lca bolts vs method were using with homemade tool between lca and frame at spring bucket. From ground to lca bolts how many " and how much diff l-r?
            Last edited by willyj; 07-05-2012, 09:40 AM.

            Comment

            • dirttrackrocker
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 664

              #7
              I ran an all metric GRT last year. I was bottoming out with a 1050 also. I went to 1100 and raised ride heights to 8" from lower control arm bolts to ground.

              Comment

              • MasterSbilt_Racer
                Senior Member
                • May 2007
                • 14304

                #8
                Go left heavy with the springs and it will reduce the rf travel and tighten the car.
                Modern Day Spec Wedge Racing

                Comment

                • willyj
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2007
                  • 116

                  #9
                  Originally posted by dirttrackrocker View Post
                  I ran an all metric GRT last year. I was bottoming out with a 1050 also. I went to 1100 and raised ride heights to 8" from lower control arm bolts to ground.
                  Both rf lf 8"?

                  Comment

                  • willyj
                    Senior Member
                    • Dec 2007
                    • 116

                    #10
                    Originally posted by MasterSbilt_Racer View Post
                    Go left heavy with the springs and it will reduce the rf travel and tighten the car.
                    Swap ones I have 1050lf 850 rf or how much split ya talking?

                    Comment

                    • MasterSbilt_Racer
                      Senior Member
                      • May 2007
                      • 14304

                      #11
                      Originally posted by willyj View Post
                      Swap ones I have 1050lf 850 rf or how much split ya talking?
                      I don't have much experience with mods and none with all metric components on the front. I just know that going that route would allow you to run the rf spring you have. I would probably try 1200lf and 1050rf unless someone who knows better says that is stupid. I ran 1400lf and 1000rf in a metric street stock and was very fast. That is a different animal, but gives you an idea.
                      Modern Day Spec Wedge Racing

                      Comment

                      • dirttrackrocker
                        Senior Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 664

                        #12
                        I wouldn't go less than 1050 on RF. You can go heavier on LF but, I wouldn't go more than 50 - 100 #

                        Comment

                        • willyj
                          Senior Member
                          • Dec 2007
                          • 116

                          #13
                          Verified the ride hts were over 8" from ground to lca bolts! To late in week to get new springs. Left the 1050 rf found 70 duro full spring rubber to go on lf. 850. Thanks for all replies,have a lot to try now!

                          Comment

                          • SRXtripman
                            Member
                            • Oct 2010
                            • 39

                            #14
                            Springs

                            Ive had the same isues with mine until we did some outside the box thinking, i raised my ride heights to within an inch or so of 8" , and went to a 650 rgt, 750 lft, with a tie down shock. Metric lowers, spindles and adjustable uppers.

                            Comment

                            • willyj
                              Senior Member
                              • Dec 2007
                              • 116

                              #15
                              Originally posted by SRXtripman View Post
                              Ive had the same isues with mine until we did some outside the box thinking, i raised my ride heights to within an inch or so of 8" , and went to a 650 rgt, 750 lft, with a tie down shock. Metric lowers, spindles and adjustable uppers.
                              Ain't saying it won't work just don't seem logical! Have read Mr Adams post along with the motion ratio post's. I think lighting chassis used metric for years and he suggested a min of 1050rf. Mine's not a lightning so who's to say soft won't work. Rained out sat gonna try 1125 rf 1050 lf. I do have a 750- 850 lying around, may just try them. We are running the bottom on a 1/4 mile so?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X