metric chassis ride height?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • stillfast
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2007
    • 353

    #1

    metric chassis ride height?

    Trying to help a friend set up his mod. We don't know who built it, but it is a metric clip, metric spindles and lowers. I is a 2 bar rear suspension with a pull bar. It will run with UMP. Any help on ride heights for the metric clip? Springs? Bite? Thanks
  • Kojak_9x
    Senior Member
    • May 2007
    • 179

    #2
    Lf 6.5" @ bottom of frame rail before dog leg.
    With 700# 9.5" tall
    Rf 7-7.25" same place w/600 spring 9.5 tall
    K772/K727 ball joints
    Rear springs 175/225 RR on top LR infront
    Dont remember rear hts. 130# bite
    Lr bar 2" shorter then RR bar
    Short Pull bar with quickcar buiscuits 1/8" preload change every 10 nights run @ 18*
    No wrap up shock
    Short bar on slick/j bar on heavy/tackey
    Lr bar 20ish* rr bar 10-15*
    shocks Lf 75 rf 74. Lr 95-3 (gas) Rr 94
    Cross 52 left 52.5 rear 57-58 on alky 56-57on gas

    Now this is what worked for me on a sandy track check with some people at ur local track to see what they ran. May have to drop bar angle/bite/cross for a track with good clay!

    Comment

    • stillfast
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2007
      • 353

      #3
      metric chassis

      Thank you. That is enough info to get us going.

      Comment

      • outacontrol
        Member
        • Jun 2007
        • 39

        #4
        Kojak, are those springs rates for metric lowers, or nova lowers?
        http://www.inthepits.com

        Comment

        • dirttrackrocker
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 664

          #5
          Looks pretty soft for metric lowers....

          Comment

          • Kojak_9x
            Senior Member
            • May 2007
            • 179

            #6
            Yes metric lowers! I know this always starts argument but i have always had success with those spring rates. My current car 4/4 is all metric and run 700/650 with a tie down shock on the Rf! Everyone says u cant run that soft of a spring on metric mods but i know of alot of cars that do and even run lighter then that. Ive been doing it since 03 and dont plan on changing it! Alot of people say they bottom out and i have no idea why, im guessing they are running stock metric ball joints and/or have their ride heights to low. Kinda sounds like they may have a Moment Center issue.

            Comment

            • willyj
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2007
              • 116

              #7
              Originally posted by Kojak_9x View Post
              Yes metric lowers! I know this always starts argument but i have always had success with those spring rates. My current car 4/4 is all metric and run 700/650 with a tie down shock on the Rf! Everyone says u cant run that soft of a spring on metric mods but i know of alot of cars that do and even run lighter then that. Ive been doing it since 03 and dont plan on changing it! Alot of people say they bottom out and i have no idea why, im guessing they are running stock metric ball joints and/or have their ride heights to low. Kinda sounds like they may have a Moment Center issue.
              This goes against most rates I've read about, but I'm gonna try a 750rf 850 lf! Does seem like no matter what rf spring rate we have shock travel stays the same!

              Comment

              Working...
              X