Just a real simple question. Why is it the motor of choice these days?
Crate Motor Debate
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
well for us it's travel time and cost. we run a 602 class 30 min from the house. ran ump first of the year and was on the road most of the time. in imca it comes down to hard tires and with the cost of fuel the track are allot dryer then they use to be so the crate just works out better.
Comment
-
As an engine builder I agree with stock car driver these engines could be easily duplicated keep the compression mild and the rpm right around the crate also the reason the crate is so driveable is the increase in the lobe separation (112) with some of the engine I build and run we have seen success with the wider separation makes the torque and hp curve flat and a lot easier to hook up. Why people are still trying to run big cubes with a lot of compression and high rpm is beyond me especially when the crate has proven you can win with 450 hp this is just my opinion.
Comment
-
I agree with stock car and will add the following. It is a package deal. Not only are the crates more driveable with the torque curve being smooth and not too peaky, but then you add in the little spoiler and weight off the nose, and theres your answer. its the whole deal, not just the motor itself. On a stop and go tight corner track, the crates however are not the top choice. I know several of the top guys in IMCA use another car with open motor on the small stop and go tracks.
Comment
-
Can you really build a brand new, vortec steel heads, motor for $2900? Many have tried in my area and couldn't do it.Originally posted by dereksehi View PostIf nose weight is an issue then more people that like the open motor choice should be running Ford 347s they are light and seem to make real good power and could be reliably built for right around the crate price.
Just basically throw on a carb and water pump and your racin. I think that's whats driving the crate motor deal now. imo
Comment
-
drtrkr244 I thought we were talking about the 604 crate? As far as building a new engine for $2900 I have not seen where you can buy a 602 for $2900 but if you want an engine that is the same quality as a 602 which couldnt be a 347 if you are talking about competing in the norhern sportmod class cuz its not legal. An engine of equal quality to the 602 could probly be built for right around that price if you wanted cast pistons stock rods with the stock bolts stock valves and springs and RV/towing hydraulic camshaft which is what the 602 is.
Comment
-
I agree I wouldn't use lightweight rotating either these crates are just another engine they can be duplicated very easily I've done quite a bit of R and D against the 602 crate and have come up with a successful engine package against them I don't believe building one against the 604 would be much different just have to keep it toned down some.
Comment
-
I'm not sure why they are doing that the lighter the rotating the quicker the engine will be which isn't good on the slick especially with junk IMCA tires. I believe if an engine was fairly mild lower compression cubic inches right around 350 run at a respectable rpm like 6500 and the right camshaft they would be just as driveable as a crate with just a little more grunt.
Comment
-
motor
Originally posted by DirtRacer9xSo why doesn't someone start building a proven steel crate motor? I've seen a couple builders duplicate the HP and TQ but I'm not convinced that they did it properly. Meaning I saw they used lighter rotating assembly and etc things. I believe the rotating assembly being the same has a lot to do with the car and its handling as well. I'm not an engine builder by any means but just my $.02 and theory.
FYI there are lots of builders out there now building "crate killer" motors. Kevin Stoa among others have been doing it for a while now. But again, its the package, not just the crate, that makes it work.
Comment
-
Its not just the fact of being smooth which is very important too but too much power just overwelms the tires as well as running a lot of gear. There is no way these IMCA tires will hold near that amount of power so why build an engine that produces that much? I would guess as long as you stayed right around the power and torque the crate makes and stayed fairly mild on compression but use the wide lsa the engine would be just as smooth and reliable as the crate. Also using the lightweight rotating would boost the cost and more than likely make the engine too quick to be manageable on dry which around here is every nite.
Comment
-
I was going by the 3,5 post, but I saw some were talking about alum heads so I knew that was the 604. For whatever reason, the 602 in my area isn't legal, in any class. Go figure!Originally posted by dereksehi View Postdrtrkr244 I thought we were talking about the 604 crate? As far as building a new engine for $2900 I have not seen where you can buy a 602 for $2900 but if you want an engine that is the same quality as a 602 which couldnt be a 347 if you are talking about competing in the norhern sportmod class cuz its not legal. An engine of equal quality to the 602 could probly be built for right around that price if you wanted cast pistons stock rods with the stock bolts stock valves and springs and RV/towing hydraulic camshaft which is what the 602 is.
Comment
-
I build all my own engines and think most of the responses are fairly close it is a package, but one piece of the puzzle is the roller cam. Years ago I had a 377 roller cam motor when we could still run roller cams, it was the best motor I ever had for smooth useable power. Won a lot of features with that motor, but when I switched it over to the flat tappet junk the motor never ran the same. I still use the engine and have tried probably 15 different cams with no success. One example is wissota this year, the crate didn't dominate like imca. But they have a spec headed 355 with a roller cam. Very usable power.
Comment
Comment