We didn't take any Oil, we took out a dictator who refused to go by U.N. regulation. We didn't take any land, oil, or take over a country for our own good. We freed Iraqi people of a bad government, and a bad man. And give them their country back using taxpayers money
Media crack down coming
Collapse
X
-
Are you a politician because you sure just answered my question like you are lolOriginally posted by gator 49 View PostWe didn't take any Oil, we took out a dictator who refused to go by U.N. regulation. We didn't take any land, oil, or take over a country for our own good. We freed Iraqi people of a bad government, and a bad man. And give them their country back using taxpayers money
I never said we took any oil. I asked you think we invaded Iraq?
Do you believe taking their oil would be a war crime?
Comment
-
-
Is that after the country is rebuilt?Originally posted by a25rjr View PostNo, I think we should negotiate a % of every gallon until we are paid back!
Syria and Iraq should have their natural resources nationalized with profits going towards rebuilding. Its the only right thing to do
All natural resources should be nationalized. What a scam. Not to mention national security conflicts.
Comment
-
Whatever is reasonable! Im sure with the billions they make off of oil, a subsidy to us, wont kill them!Originally posted by balljoint View PostIs that after the country is rebuilt?
Syria and Iraq should have their natural resources nationalized with profits going towards rebuilding. Its the only right thing to do
All natural resources should be nationalized. What a scam. Not to mention national security conflicts.Turn LEFT, Vote RIGHT!
Comment
-
ALERT!!! I am getting more than a full load of BS Mr. kidrock. Expect a full blown rant Of cutting your biased and unfounded opinions apart each a every time you spew the warped nonsensical political garbo.Originally posted by kidrock View PostWell the law says it's a war crime. So I guess you want to be lawless.
Look up what pillage means and then tell me if taking their oil would not be pillaging?
First of fall has any war ever been won without one nation ever crossing the borders of another nation, and second are there not wars that are created out of justification? Rant all about Chaney and Bush you wish but in the world off reality there was world wide unanimous support for going to war with Iraq.
Now would you quit invading 4M???? hahhahahaahaaaaaaa
Comment
-
You know what I will say this as nice as I can NO lmao!!!!!!!!!Originally posted by Clayton_Wetter View PostALERT!!! I am getting more than a full load of BS Mr. kidrock. Expect a full blown rant Of cutting your biased and unfounded opinions apart each a every time you spew the warped nonsensical political garbo.
First of fall has any war ever been won without one nation ever crossing the borders of another nation, and second are there not wars that are created out of justification? Rant all about Chaney and Bush you wish but in the world off reality there was world wide unanimous support for going to war with Iraq.
Now would you quit invading 4M???? hahhahahaahaaaaaaa
Hey you admitted we did in fact invade Iraq. I bet that about killed you didn't it lol
If I have to listen to your garbage I guess you will have to listen to mine lmao!!Last edited by kidrock; 01-25-2017, 08:56 PM.
Comment
-
No you will keep listening to my facts and truth and we will keep listening to your clueless defense of a failed corrupt Democrat party where you lamely try to take down people that don't share your unfounded and unjustified views in which you mainly show contempt for. You just keep trying with total failure to make Republicans and Independents no better than the gutter party you stand with.Originally posted by kidrock View PostYou know what I will say this as nice as I can NO lmao!!!!!!!!!
Hey you admitted we did in fact invade Iraq. I bet that about killed you didn't it lol
If I have to listen to your garbage I guess you will have to listen to mine lmao!!
Well you've failed and can't accept that reality!!!
Comment
-
You mean your alternative facts, sorry but, I will passOriginally posted by Clayton_Wetter View PostNo you will keep listening to my facts and truth and we will keep listening to your clueless defense of a failed corrupt Democrat party where you lamely try to take down people that don't share your unfounded and unjustified views in which you mainly show contempt for. You just keep trying with total failure to make Republicans and Independents no better than the gutter party you stand with.
Well you've failed and can't accept that reality!!!
Remember when you told people not to vote for Trump? lolLast edited by kidrock; 01-25-2017, 09:36 PM.
Comment
-
but remember when he did ..........................................what was right for his party and the people !!!!! No baby stepsm with the ytrumpster !!!! And you libtards can't handle it !!!Originally posted by kidrock View Postyou mean your alternative facts, sorry but, i will pass
remember when you told people not to vote for trump? Lol
Comment
-
No I didn't. I said we crossed their border.Originally posted by kidrock View PostYou know what I will say this as nice as I can NO lmao!!!!!!!!!
Hey you admitted we did in fact invade Iraq. I bet that about killed you didn't it lol
If I have to listen to your garbage I guess you will have to listen to mine lmao!!
Comment
-
more 100% fake news
fake news: Trump did not threaten troops to Mexico
Drudge may have fallen for a headline. Prominently on his front page, in huge red letters, there is a headline about Trump threatening Pena Nieto with sending troops into Mexico because "he won't handle the cartel situation" and because "Mexican troops are too afraid to face the cartels"
PROBLEM: When you actually read the AP report Drudge linked, it says that one small news outlet in Mexico, and one source in America made the claim. AP said they had access to the entire phone call and nothing of the sort was said by Trump. So most likely Drudge fell for fake news. That can happen to anyone now.
UPDATE: THE MEXICAN MEDIA IS REPORTING THE STORY. THEY ARE SAYING IT IS NOT TRUE. They are also reporting that the Mexican government is saying it is a lie hatched by two news sources, one in Mexico and one in the U.S. The AP report that also casts doubt on the story is Here Ok, the Mexican report got more detailed. Here is what spawned it all: The cartels feel threatened by Trump. So they are inventing fake news stories, and releasing them with plants they have in the media, at the highest levels possible. The goal is to stifle Trump by making the Mexican people believe he is after all of them, rather than only the cartels. By doing so, they hope to stop Trump from taking them down by making the Mexican people resist every effort Trump makes to nail the cartels.
I was shocked by the headline on Drudge, saying Trump really did say it, and am glad it ended up being fake because if it was not, Trump would be off his rocker. That would be the last political situation we need right now.
Comment
-
If Sadam didn't sell oil for gold, he would still be there. This war was about the Oil Dollar and the groundwork for the Iranian war has started. Missiles really, not large enough to carry a atomic bomb, 600 mile range. They are selling oil to China for gold. That puts them on the hit list.Originally posted by castone View PostIf Saddam was still in power in Iraq there would be no Isis!
For anyone that is unfamiliar All the Mid East countries that produce oil have a agreement to only sell for US dollars. This creates stability for the dollar. Used to be gold backed, then a promise to pay dollar, is now a Oil dollar. This is actually good for US. If anyone tries to attack the dollar they pay, because everyone uses energy. It makes the dollar stable in the world. The cost is kicking Butt here and there. Sounds a lot like extortion for some reason.
Comment
Comment