Has Doofer Trump Ruined the Stock Market?

[Barbecueboy]

I haven't live paycheck to paycheck for the last 25 years. I live with in my means. Everything I have his paid for. I don't need the biggest house or a new vehicle every 2 years. I don't need to keep up with the Barbecueboy or zero's of the world.

Sure you do......

[ss12]

Well we can thank Obama that there is no a difference between a investment banking and a commercial bank. The separation was made in 1934 by the Glass Steagal act just to keep banks from loosing your savings, like they did during the great depression. It worked for a long time, but thank the liberals, it is no longer their. Now tell us something you know about.

Actually the repeal of Glass Seagall was a bill sponsored by Republicans(Gramm, Leach and Bliley) in 1999. Bill Clinton did approve the bill.

On 7-21-10 Obama signed the Dodd - Frank act into law which did help regulated banks.

On 5-24-18 Trump signed a bill to roll back certain regulations of the Dodd - Frank act.

That's all I know!! Obviously you didn't know as much as you thought you did! Always wanting to blame the liberals but should be blaming the republicans.

[Barbecueboy]

That last sentence.......yeah the liberals would never do anything like that......hypocrite.

[TS FAN]

The hilarious thing is that people like SS apparently don't realize that Wall Street, Banks and Silicone Valley own the Dem party. Especially the later. that is the reason the dems are all of the sudden reversing course on immigration. Where is Silicon Valley and where can the get cheap labor? Another hilarious thing is Dodd Frank. After Dodd and Frank over saw the banks and allowed them to bring the world into a crisis, they then put in regulations to cover up their disaster. However it didn't, they didn't fool no one, they let it happen on their watch. BTW, I noticed that neither one of them even tried to be re-elected. So lets be clear. Banks do need a certain amount of regulation. Wall Street is a casino, but the house is the long term investor who sets up his/her portfolio Correctly and doesn't deviate when markets go up and down. This last statement is one the liberals do not realize apparently. BTW all my clients are long term investors and all of them have made a decent return over the years. Reason? They don't play the market. There is a huge difference. Funny thing. Ole Liz Warren is going to run as a person who will take down banks and wall street. Yet they will be her biggest financial supporters. Figure that one out. Gee, let me think. She is a danger to the financial industry, which she already over reached trying to run Financial advisors out of business because they are not needed according to her. Made a complete fool of herself and had to back off her most obscene regulations. She still did a lot of damage to that industry. BTW Wall Street and Financial advisors are two separate
entities

[Barbecueboy]

Ss12 hair just caught on fire reading that......stop with all the facts will ya??

Boy is going to go drown his sorrows in bagfulls of filet o fishes after that tidal wave of fact.

[TS FAN]

The truth is that Silicon Valley does in fact own the DEM party. Another example Pelosi and the Electric Fence. No clear thinking person would for one minute think she dreamed that up. People must be aware that the Giant Tech companies want to run America through the Dem party. They really are not hiding it either. IOW the Country should be run by California values. Notice too that the liberal hack Cal. Governor is busy campaigning in swing states and really has no interest in running for President at this time. People really need to wake up to what is going on. If they want this bunch to run the Country, then that is their decision. But as far as the Democratic Party of even 10 years ago, it doesn't exist. Socialism also benefits Silicon Valley. will be interesting to see if the California Socialist Senator C. Harris gets propped up by This bunch. It will be very telling. We have far too many people in this Country that do not think for themselves and they are mostly on the left. They just really do not understand or take the time.

[ss12]

Ss12 hair just caught on fire reading that......stop with all the facts will ya??

Boy is going to go drown his sorrows in bagfulls of filet o fishes after that tidal wave of fact.

I'm just sitting back and let TS explain it. He already back tracking from his post 214. In this post the democrat party is owned by Banks, Wall street, and Silicone Valley. Then in post 216 now its just Silicone valley. Admits that we need to regulate banks. Admits wall street is just a big casino. Admits that's he's a great financial advisors and his clients have made a "decent" return on their investment. I would just like to know what a decent return is.

[TS FAN]

Apparently you have trouble understanding or you are just spinning as any good Dem would do. Try just reading it. I think I made things pretty clear. As for what I call a decent return, it means just that. I will help you a bit with it. But first reread it, it is about long term investor behavior and how they benefit. Your attempt to under mind my posts are a bit feeble./smile smile there ss12

[ss12]

TS how about a percentage on their return. Was a decent return 2% or 10%.

[Barbecueboy]

It depends on the investor and the amount of planned risk he or she wants to take and how long they can take it.

You're really not that good at knowing how all of this works are you?

I'm sure the percentage of returns varies from person to person......sort of like the IQ levels of people in this very thread.

No wonder you're so worried.

[ss12]

I have a good ideal on how it works but I'm no expert and I do not claim to be. TS Claims he is the financial advisor expert not me. He the one with clients. I just have one question and what is a decent percentage on returns. To me it would be pretty simple if I was an expert to say if you are in a low risk fund in the last 5 years you should be getting a 5% return on your investment If you are in medium risk a "decent" return would be 10%. If you are in a high risk you should be getting a return of X amount. How hard is that to answer if you are an expert?

If you are looking for a good conversation with people with high IQ levels your on the wrong site. Are does this site fit your ego because you think you are smarter than everybody else? You should go and test your IQ on other high IQ forums. I think you are up to the challenge.

[Barbecueboy]

Yup, you have no idea how it works except for what you you've been told to believe........sounds about right considering your party affiliation.

[Barbecueboy]

I have a good ideal on how it works but I'm no expert and I do not claim to be. TS Claims he is the financial advisor expert not me. He the one with clients. I just have one question and what is a decent percentage on returns. To me it would be pretty simple if I was an expert to say if you are in a low risk fund in the last 5 years you should be getting a 5% return on your investment If you are in medium risk a "decent" return would be 10%. If you are in a high risk you should be getting a return of X amount. How hard is that to answer if you are an expert?

If you are looking for a good conversation with people with high IQ levels your on the wrong site. Are does this site fit your ego because you think you are smarter than everybody else? You should go and test your IQ on other high IQ forums. I think you are up to the challenge.

Been there done that, got the sheepskin tshirt to prove it......unlike the sheep wool tshirts you wear....not smarter than everyone, just you.

[CIRF]

I have a good ideal on how it works but I'm no expert and I do not claim to be. TS Claims he is the financial advisor expert not me. He the one with clients. I just have one question and what is a decent percentage on returns. To me it would be pretty simple if I was an expert to say if you are in a low risk fund in the last 5 years you should be getting a 5% return on your investment If you are in medium risk a "decent" return would be 10%. If you are in a high risk you should be getting a return of X amount. How hard is that to answer if you are an expert?

If you are looking for a good conversation with people with high IQ levels your on the wrong site. Are does this site fit your ego because you think you are smarter than everybody else? You should go and test your IQ on other high IQ forums. I think you are up to the challenge.

ss12, I'm certainly not taking up for TS FAN aka power boy since he very closely resembles a gutless weasel. However, with that said, the assertion power boy makes by using the word "decent" is about as accurate as you can expect in terms of financial performance. The variables involved in evaluating return on investment performance are nearly infinite which makes it very near infinitely impossible to put hard and fast numbers to those performances. Got no particular dog in this fight but take the term "decent" for what it implies across the board.

[TS FAN]

I have a good ideal on how it works but I'm no expert and I do not claim to be. TS Claims he is the financial advisor expert not me. He the one with clients. I just have one question and what is a decent percentage on returns. To me it would be pretty simple if I was an expert to say if you are in a low risk fund in the last 5 years you should be getting a 5% return on your investment If you are in medium risk a "decent" return would be 10%. If you are in a high risk you should be getting a return of X amount. How hard is that to answer if you are an expert?

If you are looking for a good conversation with people with high IQ levels your on the wrong site. Are does this site fit your ego because you think you are smarter than everybody else? You should go and test your IQ on other high IQ forums. I think you are up to the challenge.

No, I am racing die hard fan, grew up around dirt tracks and love it. I happen to have a profession and not for a minute do I think IQ superior to people on this board. There are a lot of quite intelligent posts and threads in the section. Some silly ones too, mostly by people who choose not to engage in conversations, just bash. You keep singling out the return thing. I keep trying to tell you decent returns are just that. Just like my buddy CIRF said, and you know he just admires me. The thing is, there is more important things to understand in what I am trying to convey. You think Trump is bad as President? You might want to take note in what the alternative is for instance as i noted