Impeachment news.

[ss12]

Well Said .... The facts are politicians are busy making themselves rich while telling us to vote socialism .... Trump has proved to all of us a business man needs to run the country ....

Bob I used to think a business man should run this country. Now I have changed my mine after seeing what the conman is doing with his position. One of the first things he done was give the rich another tax relief program which in it self is socialism. Socialism for the rich. This tax break did benefit Trump. Trump is now using the riches country in the world to serve his best interest and the hell with everybody else in this country. The tariffs effect everybody in this country some more than others. The Tariffs is just another form of taxes. Give the rich a tax break and tax(tariffs) everybody else.

[ZERO25]

[QUOTE=ss12;2289233] One of the first things he done was give the rich another tax relief program which in it self is socialism. Socialism for the rich. The Tariffs is just another form of taxes.

And if you believe that BS, you're the real CONMAN!

[fastford]

Bob I used to think a business man should run this country. Now I have changed my mine after seeing what the conman is doing with his position. One of the first things he done was give the rich another tax relief program which in it self is socialism. Socialism for the rich. This tax break did benefit Trump. Trump is now using the riches country in the world to serve his best interest and the hell with everybody else in this country. The tariffs effect everybody in this country some more than others. The Tariffs is just another form of taxes. Give the rich a tax break and tax(tariffs) everybody else.

off coarse you did , until one actually got elected and started improving the mess left by your hero obammer , but your party of choice had nothing to do with it and you and your party,s jealousy spews day in and day out , but yet you along with every other dem are benefiting as well , but thats ok , except it is leading to the destruction of one of our political parties which will eventually effect our system of checks and balances.........sad......

[dirtMAN007]

bob i used to think a business man should run this country. Now i have changed my mine after seeing what the conman is doing with his position. One of the first things he done was give the rich another tax relief program which in it self is socialism. Socialism for the rich. This tax break did benefit trump. Trump is now using the riches country in the world to serve his best interest and the hell with everybody else in this country. The tariffs effect everybody in this country some more than others. The tariffs is just another form of taxes. Give the rich a tax break and tax(tariffs) everybody else.

to hell with everyone else huh ? Lowest unemployment numberrs in 50 + years but that helps no one but him ? Helps him get re elected and you cannot handle it ! You are one sad pos !!!!!

[anthonycacace]

Trump has proved to all of us a business man needs to run the country ....

How?

By potentially running a larger projected budget deficit than any other individual who has held the office? Wasn't that and the subsequent additional debt an issue with y'all during the last Presidency? I know it was, cause I found thread history about it in my account the other day. Why the change of heart about this situation now?

Or, is it by Dirty Don being projected as the first executive since 1984 to preside over a negative off-budget (primarily Medicare/Social Security - collections & remittances) numeric measure? What's the marketer/carnival barker's plan to fix this?

(See OMB budget Table 1.1 for reference: https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/historical-tables/)

[anthonycacace]

to hell with everyone else huh ? Lowest unemployment numberrs in 50 + years but that helps no one but him ?

If you use the 'true' unemployment measure (U-6) this is not a correct statement. October 2000 has a 0.1% lower U-6 unemployment rate then the current U-6 rate (6.8 vs 6.9). So, the math is off by about 30 years. Wanna just correct yourself and say the U-1 rate is the lowest it's been in 50 years?

Also, the overall labor participation rate remains lagging behind the October 2000 participation rate by about 3%. So, it's a lot easier to say the unemployment rate is lower when you have fewer people in the labor market employed or seeking work compared against the overall work eligible population.

[ZERO25]

If you use the 'true' unemployment measure (U-6) this is not a correct statement. October 2000 has a 0.1% lower U-6 unemployment rate then the current U-6 rate (6.8 vs 6.9). So, the math is off by about 30 years. Wanna just correct yourself and say the U-1 rate is the lowest it's been in 50 years?

Also, the overall labor participation rate remains lagging behind the October 2000 participation rate by about 3%. So, it's a lot easier to say the unemployment rate is lower when you have fewer people in the labor market seeking work compared to the overall work eligible population.

Theres always that one liberal that tries to manipulate the data to bolster their argument ^^^^^^^! smh

[anthonycacace]

Theres always that one liberal that tries to manipulate the data to bolster their argument ^^^^^^^! smh

Nope, BOTH sides on this forum have used these various unemployment measures to prove a point.

Others known to do this on the Republican side INCLUDE attempts to VASTLY exaggerate the amount by candidate Dirty Don himself:

During the Sept. 28, 2015, media event, Trump described an unemployment rate in the range of 5 percent as "such a phony number."

"The number isn't reflective," he said. "I've seen numbers of 24 percent -- I actually saw a number of 42 percent unemployment. Forty-two percent." He continued, "5.3 percent unemployment -- that is the biggest joke there is in this country. … The unemployment rate is probably 20 percent, but I will tell you, you have some great economists that will tell you it's a 30, 32. And the highest I've heard so far is 42 percent."

https://www.thefiscaltimes.com/2016/12/09/Trump-Says-Unemployment-Rate-Bogus-and-His-Labor-Pick-Puzder-Agrees

So, how is one side cherry picking for support of their claims while the other side doesn't?

At least I can back up my numbers with hard data; Dirty Don and others seem to lack this same ability.

[ZERO25]

You have lost all credibility by:

1. using statements from 2015
2. using the name dirty Don
3. you still haven't gotten over 2016 election!

[mcarter815]

You have lost all credibility by:

1. using statements from 2015
2. using the name dirty Don
3. you still haven't gotten over 2016 election!

You're obviously running out of arguments.

[anthonycacace]

You have lost all credibility by:

1. using statements from 2015

So a past LIE, isn't a LIE? Or, what does this matter; those who don't understand or fail to remember history are doomed to repeat it.

2. using the name dirty Don

Fair enough, but want me to dig up the far worse things the past President was called? Shoot, just simply look at Clayton's degrading use above and let me know why I am the one that lacks credibility based on such.

I've given this title because to me the President's actions have been no better than a NY mafia Don. Plus, he's from Manhattan and owns Atlantic City casinos, you telling me he ain't connected?

3. you still haven't gotten over 2016 election!

Not sure how you made this leap. Much to the displeasure of those around me, I actually foresaw the marker-in-chief being elected.

Further, NO ONE has yet disproven any claims of fact I've noted herein. Wanna try that next time instead? I'll go one further and make y'all a deal; if someone can disprove a fact given by me, I'll drop the mafia tag.

[anthonycacace]

One fact Antonio, there are now more jobs than there are workers, and much less real unemployment and food stamps than under Obomunism......

How's that for a new word for your vast vocabulary????

Apparently in accordance with the Zero25 criteria, that will cost your credibility ...

Well, you've never had any in my eyes anyway. So, there's no foul on your part.

[anthonycacace]

It's takes credibility to recognize credibility!!!! hahahahaaha

Hard core liberalism leaves you out on that count. Nice vocab though. Using it to replace actual common sense and facts, has been exposed though (sorry for using though twice)....

Really, I see you still don't wanna answer how the Uranium One trial against Hillary and Obama is going. Why not?

[ZERO25]

It's takes credibility to recognize credibility!!!! hahahahaaha

Hard core liberalism leaves you out on that count. Nice vocab though. Using it to replace actual common sense and facts, has been exposed though (sorry for using though twice)....

BINGO!

I leave you in charge for a couple of weeks, but I was hoping you would have run off all the liberal whackos!

[anthonycacace]

Seems to be on the back burner, but it truly is a hot one that in all honesty, should fry Hildabeast and Obummer.

Problem is, you've stated there was judicial proceeding underway in the past and I proved that inaccurate.

So, were you incorrect in making this assertion then? I believe the words you are looking for are, "YES, I was mislead by one of my 'trusted news' sources. Thanks for showing me the true FACTS my liberal friend."