Impeachment news.

[dirtMAN007]

Yep they didn't like Hillary or Trump are you surprised by that?

Only difference now is this great PRESIDENT is actually helping not only the black ,Asian and Latino people but his policies are working for ALL American’s where in the past all we got was lip service from the libtards at election time ! There will be unprecedented turnout in 2020 and THIS GREAT PRESIDENT will be rewarded by receiving more people of color voting for him than any person with an R beside their name has ever received !!!!!!

[kidrock]

I didn't take it that way , I took it as they were cool because they voted for the only person that could win and everybody knew it......

sorry I missed what you meant.....changes the whole conversation don't it?

It's all good, I just didn't want people to think I was saying what Huck posted was racist because, that can get out of hand real fast.

[dirtMAN007]

It's all good, I just didn't want people to think I was saying what Huck posted was racist because, that can get out of hand real fast.

As you are well aware .................libtard whack job !

[ss12]

Another good day for the impeachment inquiry, Gordon Sondand mind has been refreshed and indicated there was a Quid Pro Quo.

Sondland submitted an amendment to his original testimony on Monday. In the update, Sondland added that he had communicated a quid pro quo to a Ukraine official, linking military aid for Ukraine that was delayed by the United States to a public statement committing to investigations Trump and his lawyer Rudy Giuliani wanted.

Since his deposition, he said reading other witnesses' statements reminded him of a conversation he had with an adviser to Ukrainian President Zelensky, Andriy Yermak.

"I now recall speaking individually with Mr. Yermak, where I said that resumption of U.S. aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks," Sondland said.

[kidrock]

Another good day for the impeachment inquiry, Gordon Sondand mind has been refreshed and indicated there was a Quid Pro Quo.

Sondland submitted an amendment to his original testimony on Monday. In the update, Sondland added that he had communicated a quid pro quo to a Ukraine official, linking military aid for Ukraine that was delayed by the United States to a public statement committing to investigations Trump and his lawyer Rudy Giuliani wanted.

Since his deposition, he said reading other witnesses' statements reminded him of a conversation he had with an adviser to Ukrainian President Zelensky, Andriy Yermak.

"I now recall speaking individually with Mr. Yermak, where I said that resumption of U.S. aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks," Sondland said.

The threat of going to prison must have gotten to him. I guess Trey Gowdy was right it's best to do these investigations in private.

[dirtMAN007]

Another good day for the impeachment inquiry, Gordon Sondand mind has been refreshed and indicated there was a Quid Pro Quo.

Sondland submitted an amendment to his original testimony on Monday. In the update, Sondland added that he had communicated a quid pro quo to a Ukraine official, linking military aid for Ukraine that was delayed by the United States to a public statement committing to investigations Trump and his lawyer Rudy Giuliani wanted.

Since his deposition, he said reading other witnesses' statements reminded him of a conversation he had with an adviser to Ukrainian President Zelensky, Andriy Yermak.

"I now recall speaking individually with Mr. Yermak, where I said that resumption of U.S. aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks," Sondland said.

PUBLIC ANTI CORRUPTION STATEMENT says it all doesn’t it ? Just wanted him to back up what he ran on ! Kinda like our GREAT PRESIDENT has done !

[ss12]

Kid I have been wondering why the republicans want the whistleblower to be identified. Will that change the evidence that has been reveal? Looks like they are just trying to muddy the water. Now they want to say that Quid pro Quo is not an impeachable offense. I think extortion is an impeachable offense.

[kidrock]

Kid I have been wondering why the republicans want the whistleblower to be identified. Will that change the evidence that has been reveal? Looks like they are just trying to muddy the water. Now they want to say that Quid pro Quo is not an impeachable offense. I think extortion is an impeachable offense.

Nothing will change the fact of what has been done here if the whistleblower is ratted out. It's funny how the Republicans only believe in the rule of law when a Democrat is in trouble but, If it's a republican they throw their hands up and scream bloody murder, call it a sham, say the process is flawed but, yet they ran an investigations under the same process I mean just ask Trey Gowdy.

[ZERO25]

Nothing will change the fact of what has been done here if the whistleblower is ratted out. It's funny how the Republicans only believe in the rule of law when a Democrat is in trouble but, If it's a republican they throw their hands up and scream bloody murder, call it a sham, say the process is flawed but, yet they ran an investigations under the same process I mean just ask Trey Gowdy.

You 2 wackos will say anything to try to prove your point!

Yall have ZERO credibility when all we heard from you two, was Russia collusion, for 2 plus years! How did that work out for ya?

I know, I know, yall got him this time! Bhahahahaha

[kidrock]

You 2 wackos will say anything to try to prove your point!

Yall have ZERO credibility when all we heard from you two, was Russia collusion, for 2 plus years! How did that work out for ya?

I know, I know, yall got him this time! Bhahahahaha

Here's what's funny there not our words the ones testifying are proving our point for us lol. As far as the Russian collusion your right they did not find any collusion but, did find obstruction but, could not indicted a sitting President and lets not forget our Attorney General was in his back pocket playing his personal attorney.

As far as they got him this time you might be right about that but, time will tell. In reality he might have done it to himself by letting Rudy to close to him.

[ss12]

Oh Zero you keep bringing up the Russia collusion. I just have one question was the conman exonerated? Are was it they aren't going to prosecute because the conman is sitting in office? You would think the conman would of learned from the Russia collusion and wouldn't try it again. The conman's poll number are way below Biden's. The conman thought I got away with it once, and my poll numbers are way down, I'll do it again what do I have to lose. Now the corrupt republican party keep defending the conman what a shame.

[dirtMAN007]

Oh Zero you keep bringing up the Russia collusion. I just have one question was the conman exonerated? Are was it they aren't going to prosecute because the conman is sitting in office? You would think the conman would of learned from the Russia collusion and wouldn't try it again. The conman's poll number are way below Biden's. The conman thought I got away with it once, and my poll numbers are way down, I'll do it again what do I have to lose. Now the corrupt republican party are following the conman what a shame.

We will see when the IG and other DOJ (the real DOJ) reports come out just WHO the conmen really are ...........and you are complicit!

[dirtMAN007]

Oh Zero you keep bringing up the Russia collusion. I just have one question was the conman exonerated? Are was it they aren't going to prosecute because the conman is sitting in office? You would think the conman would of learned from the Russia collusion and wouldn't try it again. The conman's poll number are way below Biden's. The conman thought I got away with it once, and my poll numbers are way down, I'll do it again what do I have to lose. Now the corrupt republican party keep defending the conman what a shame.

As always libtards want to change how our justice system works ...........you don’t investigate to exonerate you investigate to indict . There is no law that says you cannot indict a sitting president so if there were evidence enough for an indictment even you are smart enough to know he would have been indicted ............. but not prosecuted . And if ther was sooooo much cut and dry obstruction in the report why didn’t Nancy and her band of thieves proceed to impeachment with it ?

[balljoint]

Here's what's funny there not our words the ones testifying are proving our point for us lol. As far as the Russian collusion your right they did not find any collusion but, did find obstruction but, could not indicted a sitting President and lets not forget our Attorney General was in his back pocket playing his personal attorney.

As far as they got him this time you might be right about that but, time will tell. In reality he might have done it to himself by letting Rudy to close to him.

Rudy dirty from 9/11

[Barbecueboy]

Rudy dirty from 9/11

Agreed.....he is the same as soros, pelosi and all the other scumbags on the dem side war drum council.....crooked as a cheap piece of bacon.