Why Biden needs to be investigated!

[Stefan2k4]

https://youtu.be/zRsn_Ksn0Ks

This video does a good job of explaining why Joe Biden needs to be investigated for his abuse of power in his extortion of the government of Ukraine. It would be an abuse of power NOT to investigate this!

[fastford]

DRAIN THE SWAMP , thats all the pres is doing here...

[castone]

Joe is in for a rough road ahead, and I still believe Joe will bail out when the heat kicks in about Ukraine !

[lurker]

Joe Biden on Ukraine, Billion Dollars -(not a nice word)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnIPw_Who7E
(not a nice word)
Here’s Why The Justice Department Must Investigate Joe Biden’s “Quid Pro Quo” -(not a nice word)https://thegreggjarrett.com/heres-wh...-quid-pro-quo/

Democrats are determined to pursue their fanciful impeachment of President Trump based on an imaginary “quid pro quo.” Rep. Schiff and others have even suggested that even if there was no(not a nice word) “quid pro quo,” the Ukraine call could still be grounds for impeachment.

There is, of course, no evidence of a “quid pro quo” in President Trump’s telephone conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky on July 25, 2019.(not a nice word) The transcript of the call shows no pressure, no condition, and no demand for anything. This is corroborated by the statements of Zelensky who confirmed that there was no blackmail involved during the call and no pressure applied. (not a nice word)“Nobody pushed me,” Zelensky said.(not a nice word) We had a great phone call,” he added.(not a nice word) “It was normal.”

Ironically, there is evidence of a clear “quid pro quo” in Joe Biden’s threat to the Ukrainian government when he was Vice President and served as the point-person on Ukraine.(not a nice word) At a public forum, Biden is seen bragging on camera that he warned the Kiev government in early 2016 that he would withhold $1 billion in American aide unless a Ukrainian prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, was fired.(not a nice word) Shokin has said in interviews that he was sacked because his investigators were “on his (Hunter Biden’s) tail” in a case of suspected corruption involving Burisma where the V-P’s son held a board seat for which he was not remotely qualified.

Joe Biden’s boast about his “quid pro quo” is compelling evidence that he may have used his public office to confer a benefit $1 billion in exchange for something of value –shutting down an investigation to help his son.(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)

Yet, Democrats and the media would have you believe that Trump’s non-existent “quid pro quo” is an impeachable offense which demands his removal from office, whereas Biden’s “quid pro quo” is perfectly acceptable.(not a nice word) It is not. Here’s why Congress and the Department of Justice should investigate Biden’s actions.(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)

JOE BIDEN’S QUID PRO QUO(not a nice word)(not a nice word)

Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 15 USC 78dd -1(not a nice word) Passed in 1977 and later amended, this law criminalizes foreign bribery.(not a nice word) It is illegal for a U.S. person to coerce or influence, through bribery or extortion, a foreign nation into taking action that might financially benefit that person, his family or business. (not a nice word) If it can be shown that Biden, as V-P, used his public office to influence or coerce a foreign official into taking official action that benefited Biden’s son, then this would be a violation. Much depends on Biden’s intent.(not a nice word) In his defense, he would have to demonstrate that his intent had nothing to do with Ukraine’s investigation of Hunter Biden’s company, Burisma. However, the fired prosecutor is on record stating that Biden’s threat to withhold $1 billion in U.S. aid was motivated by, or related to, his investigation of Burisma.(not a nice word)

Bribery 18 USC 201(not a nice word) Whoever corruptly gives, offers or promises anything of value to a public official to influence an official act his guilty of bribery.(not a nice word) The government must show there was a corrupt intent to obtain a quid pro quo, although it may be implied, not explicit or expressed.

Gratuities 18 USC 201 Giving, offering or promising anything of value to a public official in exchange for any official act is a violation of the gratuities statute.(not a nice word) It is similar to bribery, although it does not require proof of a quid pro quo or corrupt intent.(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)

Hobbs Act Extortion 18 USC 1951 A threat to a foreign official in order to obtain an official benefit affecting interstate or foreign commerce would constitute extortion under the Hobbs Act.

[Clayton_Wetters]

Bite Me, needs to be investigated for brain activity!!!

Guilty of Quid Pro Quo, by the way...

[kidrock]

I agree and hope they do open an investigation because something seems fishy with his son getting that job.

[lurker]

Lets see where this one goes.

Court Filing: Hunter Biden earned $156M from Ukraine corruption - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gT5SBOo0zM

[lurker]

Hunter Biden

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 - https://www.justice.gov/criminal-fra...-practices-act

18 U.S. Code § 201. Bribery of public officials and witnesses - https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/201

[lurker]

Confidential banking records related to Hunter Biden in Senate hands: Report - https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/p...e-hands-report

[TS FAN]

Biden is finished anyway, and he was finished from the start. He had no chance. As far as the investigation, nothing will happen IMO. Typical politician that takes advantage of his situation and cheats the tax payer. Dems are protected by the system unless they do something way over the top. This qualifies, as does his China connections which are even worse, . But doubt anything will happen and he will fade into history.