Tweet
Originally posted by Barbecueboy
View Post
-
Parts of the Methodist Church disagree with you. -
Parts of me don't care.Where is the move over flag when you need it?????Comment
-
Again mcarter815, thank you for your reply...... Life is about choice. What is sad to me, some of us have parents who have no direction in life, they live like materialistic dogs, day to day with no meaning. They windup having children who are lost, and the young has no leadership thus turning to random sex, drugs, smoking, tattoos, drinking, and seeking ?????? The bad part, bad parents don't teach the next generations standards and rules, resulting in a society of no morals making the world a terrible place. Example: There is a homosexual political group, Young Democrats, in every school in every county here in Alabama, turning children into accepting homosexual lifestyles, destroying lives and futures. In California, the legislature has passed a law (waiting for the Governor to sign) reducing sex crimes. In simple words, a 21 yr old male can have sex with a 11 yr child (10 years apart), to be just a minor crime..... Can you not see what the PC liberal standards are doing?Comment
-
sick ...........evil ...............plain and simple !Originally posted by northalabama View PostComment
-
What consenting adults do in their bedroom has no affect on you. They can't turn kids gay. I never chose to find women attractive, it just happened.Originally posted by NorthAlabama View Post
What is the name of the California bill you are talking about?Comment
-
deflection ! You cannot even say that an adult having sex with a child is wrong ! The wrath of god will be upon you and i hope he takes no mercy !!!!!Originally posted by mcarter815 View PostComment
-
Of course it's wrong. I just don't take NorthAlabama's word at face value that such a bill actually exists.Originally posted by dirtMAN007 View PostComment
-
The bill allows, a party of two that are 10 yeas or less apart in age, the older aggressor does not have to register as a sex offender and charges are reduced. The claim is that there are discrimination going on not allowing minors to have sex.Comment
-
-
SB 145 is the billComment
-
You're misrepresenting that bill. It doesn't decriminalize sex with minors. It makes oral and anal sex with minors equivalent to vaginal sex. Right now an 18 year old male could have sex with his 17 year old boyfriend and the judge is required to put him on the sex offender's registry whereas an 18 year old female could have sex with her 17 year old boyfriend and the judge can make the decision whether she should go on the sex offender's registry.Originally posted by NorthAlabama View Post
The bill does nothing about whether the crime is a misdemeanor or a felony. That is determined by the ages of the people involved and is not being changed by this bill.Comment
-
anal sex is un natural ! Turd burgularing should be a crime ! You are one sic k demented individual !!!Originally posted by mcarter815 View PostComment
-
Non-reproductive sexual behavior is common in nature. Do you think oral sex is also unnatural?Originally posted by dirtMAN007 View PostComment
-
The left liberal judge's hands (now nominated by Democrats) are tied with the current law. This friendly bill is "suppose to be intended" for the LBGQ+ which undoes the law of the land and gives power the appointed (liberal) judge to make the law (where have we seen that before). You have selected false talking points of the left liberals. There are loop holes and a very serious one...........Comment
-
the difference between anal sex and a microwave oven ? A microwave won't brown your meat !!!!! Oral sex isn,t sex at all if we go by your hero slick willy,s definition !Originally posted by mcarter815 View PostComment
Comment