Tweet
Since 2004 there were 665,000,000 votes for the presidency. 19 divided by 665,000,000 = .00000003 There is your % of dead people that voted. I don't think is going to change the election that you republicans are hoping for.
-
Last edited by ss12; 11-15-2020, 02:09 PM.Haters don't really hate you, in fact they hate themselves because you are a reflection of what they wish to be. -
Newsmax Is gonna hold Biden accountableComment
-
Originally posted by ss12 View Post
The hilarity of it all is that you think only 19 dead people's votes have snuck into the system in the last 75 years........you've had more dead people in your county this year that had their votes counted.
But you keep believing what they tell you at work to believe.Where is the move over flag when you need it?????Comment
-
Remember....he's the guy on FB that gets the "top fan" badge from CNN! lolOriginally posted by Barbecueboy View PostComment
-
Pay attention Ray Charles..........Over 500 affidavits and 11,000 voter fraud complaints, not counting what shows up on the forensics of the ballot scanning machines!Originally posted by ss12 View Post
Do you think Trumps attorneys should show their evidence to the public before the trial.......never mind, i already know your answer!
fwiw......state legislatures choose electors not the media!Comment
-
Is this why every time Diaper Don's lawyers have been in court they have been laughed out of court? You have to supply some type of evidence before you go to court. Trump lost its that simple.Originally posted by ZERO25 View PostHaters don't really hate you, in fact they hate themselves because you are a reflection of what they wish to be.Comment
-
He may have lost, but it's far from simple......except for simple minds.Where is the move over flag when you need it?????Comment
-
Open your blinders Ray Charles......so you think Justice Alito and the Pa Supreme Court rulings are laughable?Originally posted by ss12 View Post
Do you think state courts and governors legally change election rules or does state legislatures.....you know that Constitution thing?Comment
-
Knowing about the constitution is one thing .............BELIEVING it is what the question is !Originally posted by ZERO25 View PostComment
-
As long as the Supreme Court does........at least 5 of them do!Originally posted by dirtMAN007 View Post
I believe this is the main reason ACB was confirmed quickly!Comment
-
-
Trump claimed, for example, that Republican election observers were banned from being present in the Philadelphia Convention Center for vote counting. That's a lie. The issue was whether the observers could stand 6 feet or 20 feet away, not whether or not there were Trump campaign observers there. There were.
In court, Judge Paul Diamond, an appointee of President George W. Bush, ended up pressing the Trump campaign lawyer Jerome Marcus, quote, "Are your observers in the counting room?" the judge asked. Marcus admitted, "There's a non-zero number of people in the room." Ah (ph), yes, a non-zero number.
"I am asking you as a member of the bar of this court," the judge said, "are people representing the plaintiffs," the Trump campaign, "in the room?" Admitted the Trump lawyer, "Yes."
This kind of thing has been playing out all over the country where the standards of evidence are a little bit higher than they are on social media.
In Georgia, the Trump campaign alleged that proper chain of custody was not maintained for 56 ballots. Fifty-six ballots in a state that president-elect Biden won by more than 14,000 votes. But 56 ballots during the canvassing process. The judge looked into that, found that the claim was unsupported. Case dismissed.
All over the country it's been like this. In Wisconsin, Trump allied lawyers contesting a Biden win tried to stop the certification of votes claiming they could prove fraud. OK. Where is the proof?
The lawyer said, quote, "evidence will be shortly forthcoming." In other words, we don't have any evidence.
Same basic thing in Michigan where Trump lawyers tried to stop the counting of the vote based on what Michigan Court of Claims Judge Cynthia Stephens called, quote, "inadmissible hearsay within hearsay."
It's been, frankly, embarrassing. No evidence, unprofessional, desperate.
Increasingly Trump campaign lawyers seem to realize being involved in fact-free desperation efforts to overturn the results of a free and fair election might not necessarily enhance their resumes.
The Trump legal team in Arizona, and trust me, you do not even want to know about the crazy Sharpie nonsense they were pushing there, that legal team has folded up their tent.
Other law firms have withdrawn their representation from the Trump campaign.
On Friday, nine cases from Trump and his allies intended to attack an undue President-Elect Joe Biden's victory in key states. Nine cases were rejected or dropped. Nine.Haters don't really hate you, in fact they hate themselves because you are a reflection of what they wish to be.Comment
-
Last edited by ss12; 11-16-2020, 05:57 AM.Haters don't really hate you, in fact they hate themselves because you are a reflection of what they wish to be.Comment
-
I know....only 19 have voted in the last 75 years.
Lmao.Where is the move over flag when you need it?????Comment
-
ss, I have no particular bone to pick with you. I understand and respect your ideological leanings. With that said, you can't discredit and dismiss the concern of citizens who are interested in just how deep or shallow the voter fraud is, whichever the case may be. There were a tremendous amount of mail in ballots cast this election which in itself poses a lot of questions as to the sanctity of the process. If pre-election day and mail in voting is going to continue we need to know where and what the problems were so as to avoid problems in future elections. And, you must admit that the legal problems that are being focused on are centered in places that have a long and ugly history of voter fraud. Namely Philadelphia and Detroit. You also know that the left leaning media outlets are going to downplay the fraud investigation, don't you?
You really can't pass off the concerns of this election as DJT's narcissistic insecurities without acknowledging the 4 year, $32 million dollar Russian hoax tantrum/impeachment that was perpetrated upon DJT, his administration and the country as a whole. If you do, you look like a fool, and I think you know and understand that.
I'm also sincerely interested in who you like better, joe or the ho? You can PM the answer if you want to keep it confidential!! LOL!Comment
Comment