Arizona Auditors Show They're Incompetence

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Osiris125
    replied
    Originally posted by kidrock View Post
    No Republican officials in the state of Arizona have.
    While I agree its a partisan sham of an audit, I must acknowledge that the Arizona Republicans defending the election are the ones from Maricopa County mainly. State-Level Republicans are very much in favor of this poorly-ran audit.

    Leave a comment:


  • kidrock
    replied
    Originally posted by dirtMAN007 View Post
    only the democrats !

    Leave a comment:


  • kidrock
    replied
    Originally posted by dirtMAN007 View Post
    only the democrats !
    Try again.............................. I can't believe they keep that from you and others

    Leave a comment:


  • dirtMAN007
    replied
    Originally posted by kidrock View Post
    no republican officials in the state of arizona have.
    only the democrats !

    Leave a comment:


  • kidrock
    replied
    Originally posted by Buford.Justice View Post
    You actually call this audit a partisan sham???????????????????????

    It was a partisan sham that happened last November that has caused this. You are in bad need of educational and moral correction!!!!
    No Republican officials in the state of Arizona have.

    Leave a comment:


  • Buford.Justice
    replied
    Originally posted by kidrock View Post
    It was 2 audits by a bi-partisan group not the partisan sham that is going on now. I will trust the bi-partisan group before any partisan group.
    You actually call this audit a partisan sham???????????????????????

    It was a partisan sham that happened last November that has caused this. You are in bad need of educational and moral correction!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • kidrock
    replied
    Originally posted by Barbecueboy View Post
    CNN has shifted all their coverage to Trump now......oh, wait.


    When does joemala admin.check in and go to work? I'm anxious to see the coverage CNN provides us.
    Ratings man ratings, when they find something their viewers want to hear it's 24/7

    Leave a comment:


  • kidrock
    replied
    The swamp is deep but since CNN won’t report on that you wouldn’t know ! Here kitty kitty !!


    HA, ha, ha, ha, ha

    Leave a comment:


  • Barbecueboy
    replied
    CNN has shifted all their coverage to Trump now......oh, wait.


    When does joemala admin.check in and go to work? I'm anxious to see the coverage CNN provides us.

    Leave a comment:


  • dirtMAN007
    replied
    Originally posted by kidrock View Post
    It was 2 audits by a bi-partisan group not the partisan sham that is going on now. I will trust the bi-partisan group before any partisan group.
    The swamp is deep but since CNN won’t report on that you wouldn’t know ! Here kitty kitty !!

    Leave a comment:


  • kidrock
    replied
    Originally posted by Buford.Justice View Post
    They were repeats of the original steal, with no chain of custody provided for many of the ballots.

    On top of that, the machines were hands off as Dominion and the other machine company refused to provide access to them. Really fair right???

    They were both corrupted recounts.
    It was 2 audits by a bi-partisan group not the partisan sham that is going on now. I will trust the bi-partisan group before any partisan group.

    Leave a comment:


  • NorthAlabama
    replied
    You know what I like about this forum, sometimes members come up with some of the best one liners that makes one ROL.

    Leave a comment:


  • lurker
    replied
    Originally posted by Osiris125 View Post
    I'm talking more about people not already wanting to believe the election was rigged.

    Well, in that case ----- I’d say it’s a big zero.

    Leave a comment:


  • Osiris125
    replied
    I feel were talking about two different kinds of convincing. I'm talking more about people not already wanting to believe the election was rigged. I'm truly curious how many people that believe that data is true didn't already believe the election was stolen anyways. It's one thing to convince somebody when they already believe you on some level and another to convince a person who originally opposes your views.

    Leave a comment:


  • lurker
    replied
    Originally posted by Osiris125 View Post
    Lurker, stuff like what Buford has just posted is why I find it hard to believe he's actually convinced people of anything.
    I follow your posting intention with the quoted example.

    While he might not be convincing the masses here --- I’d bet there are millions upon millions of 2020 voters that think the same thing Buford thinks. And are probably just as vocal about it in the circle or setting that they live in.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X