I would agree if a person was suggesting that the audit itself has had a large number of irregularities that call everything about it into question.
Arizona Auditors Show They're Incompetence
Collapse
X
-
Voter ID........id for an ice cold 40?
You need an ID for both......not sure why it's an issue at the voting booth, nobody has an issue whipping out an ID for a frosty cold 40 oz. old English.Where is the move over flag when you need it?????
Comment
-
-
I'm trying to wrap my head around.
" may I see your ID to purchase that ice cold mickeys and tipparillo?"....sure man, no problem.
" may I see your ID so you can vote for the people that run the most powerful and complex country on earth?".......F. u man.....that's racist.
But yes, it's loaded with sarcasm....most of them on this topic are....rightfully so, and they wonder why?Where is the move over flag when you need it?????
Comment
-
A simpler NO would have sufficed, I think? So the way I read your answer ---- So you think the election had NO “voting irregularities†at all, nation wide, thus, election wise, the election was fair. Yet the audit itself has “irregularitiesâ€. That’s an interesting take, considering all things known publicly by both sides of the reporting media as a whole.Originally posted by Osiris125 View PostI would agree if a person was suggesting that the audit itself has had a large number of irregularities that call everything about it into question.
I’m not so sure you really believe that, therefore you are just pulling everyone’s chain and being obstinate, looking for an argument for arguments sake, just because you can. On the back page of a message board no less. But oh well, I know where you stand on the matter being discussed.
Comment
-
That is an impressive stretch to put words in my mouth. Based on your response, me saying this particular audit has had irregularities means I don't think ANYTHING in the election went awry? I don't think I'm mincing your words here. As for anything Mcarter has said, that doesn't really matter to me. Just because I agree with Mcarter on some things doesn't mean I will back up every single thing that he says. I personally don't see an issue with Voter ID expansion in terms of requiring a driver's license number or other basic forms of ID. I do not agree with the idea that it is racist considering pretty much anybody capable of driving would be capable of submitting proper ID for mail-in voting.
Comment
-
Also, this entire thread is about a very public and extremely simple failure by the group running this audit. My comments about their competence isn't a blind accusation. It is a well-known (and from the audit group's position, self-acknowledged) fact that they screwed up by claiming Maricopa County broke the law by deleting a database before backtracking that claim. This is on top of the fact that this group is severely behind schedule when it comes to the audit overall. These situations aren't simply speculated by new groups. They are instances acknowledged by the audit itself.
Comment
-
Never been done to this magnitude before so how can they be behind ?Originally posted by Osiris125 View PostAlso, this entire thread is about a very public and extremely simple failure by the group running this audit. My comments about their competence isn't a blind accusation. It is a well-known (and from the audit group's position, self-acknowledged) fact that they screwed up by claiming Maricopa County broke the law by deleting a database before backtracking that claim. This is on top of the fact that this group is severely behind schedule when it comes to the audit overall. These situations aren't simply speculated by new groups. They are instances acknowledged by the audit itself.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Osiris125 View PostAlso, this entire thread is about a very public and extremely simple failure by the group running this audit. My comments about their competence isn't a blind accusation. It is a well-known (and from the audit group's position, self-acknowledged) fact that they screwed up by claiming Maricopa County broke the law by deleting a database before backtracking that claim. This is on top of the fact that this group is severely behind schedule when it comes to the audit overall. These situations aren't simply speculated by new groups. They are instances acknowledged by the audit itself.
You keep emplying that the Audit is run by incompetence and is one big boondoggle. Not true. Lying leftist trying to discredit a 100% competent count and counting the discrepencies is the actual reality.
Voting machine owners are claiiming they lost the passwords into the voting machines now. Dominion and others. I suppose this is a lie to you? Unreal.If you're not outraged, you're not paying attention!
Comment
-
They had an agreement with Veterans Memorial Coliseum that ran until May 14th. Considering nobody involved seemed to have a plan past that date, I would consider that as them being behind schedule. As for the passwords. County officials have stated they do not possess the passwords, not that they lost the passwords. They have stated that the passwords are in the possession of Dominion who has stated they will not give to unaccredited audit groups.Originally posted by dirtMAN007 View PostNever been done to this magnitude before so how can they be behind ?
Comment
-
Scared of what may come out ? That’s ok once Dominion vs Lindell hits the court Dominion will be exposed !Originally posted by Osiris125 View PostThey had an agreement with Veterans Memorial Coliseum that ran until May 14th. Considering nobody involved seemed to have a plan past that date, I would consider that as them being behind schedule. As for the passwords. County officials have stated they do not possess the passwords, not that they lost the passwords. They have stated that the passwords are in the possession of Dominion who has stated they will not give to unaccredited audit groups.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Osiris125 View PostThat is an impressive stretch to put words in my mouth. Based on your response, me saying this particular audit has had irregularities means I don't think ANYTHING in the election went awry? I don't think I'm mincing your words here. As for anything Mcarter has said, that doesn't really matter to me. Just because I agree with Mcarter on some things doesn't mean I will back up every single thing that he says. I personally don't see an issue with Voter ID expansion in terms of requiring a driver's license number or other basic forms of ID. I do not agree with the idea that it is racist considering pretty much anybody capable of driving would be capable of submitting proper ID for mail-in voting.All that fluffy diversion said, and I’m sure I can’t find any relevance to your point, or mine.Originally posted by Osiris125 View PostAlso, this entire thread is about a very public and extremely simple failure by the group running this audit. My comments about their competence isn't a blind accusation. It is a well-known (and from the audit group's position, self-acknowledged) fact that they screwed up by claiming Maricopa County broke the law by deleting a database before backtracking that claim. This is on top of the fact that this group is severely behind schedule when it comes to the audit overall. These situations aren't simply speculated by new groups. They are instances acknowledged by the audit itself.
So lets try this again, with a simple YES or NO answer.
Do you think the 2020 Presidential election had any voting “irregularities“ ?Last edited by lurker; 05-23-2021, 09:12 PM.
Comment
-
November 3rd Election Day, December 14 electoral college casts votes, January 6th count electoral votes. January 20th inauguration, March 20th election will be overturned, May 15th Arizona audit. What do these all have in common? Buford and his brethren have said major things were going to happen on those days to give the election to Ole Orange or to reverse the results. Tired of being wrong yet Buford?Originally posted by Buford.Justice View PostKaz it won't be drivel when the audit is over.I hate time trials.
Comment
-
Guess you were tired of WINNING though weren’t you !Originally posted by kazual View PostNovember 3rd Election Day, December 14 electoral college casts votes, January 6th count electoral votes. January 20th inauguration, March 20th election will be overturned, May 15th Arizona audit. What do these all have in common? Buford and his brethren have said major things were going to happen on those days to give the election to Ole Orange or to reverse the results. Tired of being wrong yet Buford?
Comment
Comment