Arizona Auditors Show They're Incompetence

[kazual]

dirt, i don’t see it being about winning and losing, it’s about acknowledging facts. Take the factual info and make an informed determination. It’s really not that hard. It’s when people continue to delude themselves that befuddles me. Look, I’m not a Biden fan, he would not have been my first choice. But by all accounts to this point he won, pure and simple. Yet Ole Orange would prefer to deceive his supporters and do harm to the nation, just because he’s too big an egotist to admit that Joe whipped him fair and square. Think about that Buford, your boy got beat by ole Sleepy Joe, maybe the best man won after all lol.

[lurker]

electoral college votes

Bingo!!!

While by some farfetched stretch of whatever, the popular vote could plausibly change ---- the electoral college votes will never change. Biden won. Its over. So when does Biden report to work?

[Osiris125]

If you are literally asking if I think there were or were not ANY abnormalities on ANY level. Then Yes, I believe there were abnormalities on at least some level. However, that is different from believing there were enough abnormalities that were big enough to actually sway the election. It's pointless to give a simple yes or no answer to complex topics. It's not my fault if you can't handle nuance in a topic.

[Buford.Justice]

Kaz I'm stunned that you don't get it. The cheating was just so massive nation wide. It's true and you won't believe it??? That's is just too hard to believe.

[lurker]

If you are literally asking if I think there were or were not ANY abnormalities on ANY level. Then Yes, I believe there were abnormalities on at least some level.

See, that was simple easy. And a straightforward Yes with nothing afterwards would have been even more simple easy.

It's pointless to give a simple yes or no answer to complex topics.

Not really. A simple Yes or No is non diversionary.

It's not my fault if you can't handle nuance in a topic.

You skirt questions, and flat-out ignore other questions and postings, let alone acknowledge relevance (to what you ask for to be posted) --- so it was necessary to keep your superfluous nuance filled posting manner on-point to answer a simple question.

In the future, if at all possible --- just answer questions in a straightforward manner without all of your unnecessary fluffy diversion. That will eliminate the un-needed “nuance” in-hand. I know you’re new to 4m, but you’ll figure out how to communicate in a positive and direct manner on the back page of a dirt late model message board --- hopefully sooner, than later.

[lurker]

Blast from the past.

This forum is such trash, not even able to properly process quote replies Everytime.

For what its worth Osiris125, the quote function still works just fine. And if its such “trash”, you can always not participate.

[lurker]

The cheating was just so massive nation wide.

Lets say for non-arguments sake that you’re right. That will not change the electoral college votes, thus Biden won. Nothing you or anyone else can do about it.

Again, when does Biden start his new job?

[Osiris125]

You can easily see me quote other people. If this website functioned properly, I would quote your posts. It doesn't work, so I don't. It is pointless to give a simple yes or no answer. If I simply answer your question with a yes or no, it makes it far easier to misconstrue that "yes" as it is an over-generalization of my actual opinions on the matter. As for not replying to posts, sorry not sorry for missing a post despite me responding to far more posts directly than a lot of people here.

[Osiris125]

But with that, I'm done with this thread for the most part. It's not even about the original topic anymore. You can ask for simple answers all you want but if I'm truly only arguing for the sake of arguing (tbh I am, what other point is there in talking here? Not like anybody will ACTUALLY be convinced of anything, so its more just fun to practice debating), its an extremely basic practice in debating to not simply answer with a yes or no.

[dirtMAN007]

But with that, I'm done with this thread for the most part. It's not even about the original topic anymore. You can ask for simple answers all you want but if I'm truly only arguing for the sake of arguing (tbh I am, what other point is there in talking here? Not like anybody will ACTUALLY be convinced of anything, so its more just fun to practice debating), its an extremely basic practice in debating to not simply answer with a yes or no.

I’m done ............for the most part ! Gotta love it !!!!

[dirtMAN007]

Kaz is the FACTUAL INFORMATION always FACTUAL? I believe that we have learned over and over again that sometimes it ain’t !!!!!

[kidrock]

Kaz I'm stunned that you don't get it. The cheating was just so massive nation wide. It's true and you won't believe it??? That's is just too hard to believe.

That's just simply not true. That's just want they want you to believe and they did their job on you that's for sure. Was there voter fraud sure there was on both sides but, to say it was massive nation wide NO.

[kidrock]

Kaz is the FACTUAL INFORMATION always FACTUAL? I believe that we have learned over and over again that sometimes it ain’t !!!!!

I agree, every news outlet has at some point told stories that are not true or half truths.

[kazual]

Kaz I'm stunned that you don't get it. The cheating was just so massive nation wide. It's true and you won't believe it??? That's is just too hard to believe.

Just because you say so? Ok I get it now 😀. I base some of my belief of what happened on our capitalist system. There is money, fame, and adulation galore available to anyone or any entity that can document major fraud. Yet, we’re still waiting. And Orange is driving this charade based on his own greed in efforts to raise funds, at his follower’s expense. DJT doesn’t give two hoots to a hiccup about anyone but himself.

[dirtMAN007]

You say things as opinion with such certainty ? As if it were fact !