Arizona Auditors Show They're Incompetence

[Barbecueboy]

Best two out of three, lol


Next step is Rock Paper Scissors.

[Osiris125]

Based on Buford's evidence, if two audits say Biden won and only one audit says Trump Won... Based on the practices used during this latest audit, it means Biden still won Arizona.

[kidrock]

Because the irregularities are much different and more widespread this time......doesn't matter what they call it( stolen or just lost)......just that it doesn't appear totally accurate and questions need addressed.

If it's clean , then it's clean.......if it's dirty, then the dirty will just get dirtier.....time will tell.

So what about the 2 audits that have already been done?

[Barbecueboy]

Because the irregularities are much different and more widespread this time......doesn't matter what they call it( stolen or just lost)......just that it doesn't appear totally accurate and questions need addressed.

If it's clean , then it's clean.......if it's dirty, then the dirty will just get dirtier.....time will tell.

[kidrock]

Cheating or not.......call it whatever you want.......it had a very large impact on the election results.

I get what you're saying but, that's not what is being said. Remember the Democrat's has stolen the election is what's being said. Not that there were just irregularities like every election.

So, just a big lie as has been reported.

[Barbecueboy]

Cheating or not.......call it whatever you want.......it had a very large impact on the election results.

[kidrock]

SLATE: Audit “More and More Likely” To Show Trump Won Arizona!

Oops, that was was an extreme liberal rag saying that. WTF

With that Audit that's going I don't think anyone has any doubt what will come out of that sham of an audit. They've done 2 audits and they both showed Biden won.

[kidrock]

kidrock, as I was saying.

New Hampshire Auditors Find Reliability Issues With Machines Only 28% Of Republican Votes Counted - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJAMXVmPUn8

(The actual report gives both parties data at the very end.)

So, no cheating involved just malfunction of machines which really affected both parties.

[Osiris125]

I also looked up that Slate post since it really did sound way too weird for a Slate headline (it was, the real headline is: "What if the Unorthodox Arizona Audit Declares Trump Won", a drastically different statement)... I HAVE to assume Buford didn't actually read the article, because it talks about HUGE flaws in this audit and quotes advisors from the audit stating that they aren't even really intent on counting the votes. If Buford is pushing this article as fact, he would be claiming that the entire audit is a farce.

[Osiris125]

I actually agree that there is a big problem shown by that video. No US elections should be ran on 20+ year old equipment. I don't see this as proof of intentional election fraud like Trump has pushed. I also see what you were saying before, though I feel a lot of people here have very different ideas on what is considered proper evidence to back up their claims. Of course, some are more open-minded than others, but in my eyes... If people can't even agree on what counts as evidence, there isn't a path to understanding one another.

[lurker]

kidrock, as I was saying.

New Hampshire Auditors Find Reliability Issues With Machines Only 28% Of Republican Votes Counted - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJAMXVmPUn8

(The actual report gives both parties data at the very end.)

[ZERO25]

wow , you guys and gals crack me up , you got your way , you defeated the mean ole orange man ( that BTW had the country headed in the best direction in years ) with nothing but a puppet , ole sleepy joe , you guys knew he was incompetent , but that did not matter , it was defeat trump at ALL cost , and even if it did include cheating , none of you care , especially the means in which you go to deny it , and truth be known , I doubt any one really knows the extent cheating was or was not done and we will probable never know , I am glad however that at least a few of you on the other side are for voting reform because with out it , there will never be any confidence in our election system again on either side , but either way , your man , or at least a shell of a man is in charge now , and good or bad , he is what we have for 3 1/2 more years , and i was worried about him kicking off and kamaler taking over , but after seeing her response to being put in charge of the border , im not worried any more because she probably would not even show up , oh no , then we would have ole antique Nancy........dam , I better just stop........

Keep preaching the truth ff........some of us are listening!

[lurker]

I still have confidence in our elections ----

I don’t. Never have trusted the computerized voting machine’s, never will. Just too much trust is put in something that for the right person(s) is hackable IMHO.

Heck, Mcarter815 could probably backdoor it, the Pentagon, and NSA in 5 minutes flat if he wanted to. j/k

[lurker]

Thanks kidrock and kazual

[lurker]

---- and truth be known , I doubt any one really knows the extent cheating was or was not done and we will probable never know

I’d agree 100%, while also saying --- I personally think the popular vote “voting irregularities” were higher than most think.