General Flynn

[kidrock]

I guess it's hard to pick sides when they both suk.

I have to agree...........

[kidrock]

you gotta admit that the one kitty kitty rock voted for sucks wwwwwaaaaayyyyyy more !

Ha ha ha ha ha

[dirtMAN007]

i guess it's hard to pick sides when they both suk.

you gotta admit that the one kitty kitty rock voted for sucks wwwwwaaaaayyyyyy more !

[Barbecueboy]

Problem there was nothing to be upset about then and now.

I guess it's hard to pick sides when they both suk.

[kidrock]

Problem is you just don't get it!!! hehe

You're right I don't get your nonsense ha, ha, ha

[Buford.Justice]

Problem there was nothing to be upset about then and now.

Problem is you just don't get it!!! hehe

[kidrock]

But in 2020 there was a real reason to be upset. It's all about the reasons.

Problem there was nothing to be upset about then and now.

[Buford.Justice]

I just think it's ironic these are the same people who was calling Democrat's in 2016 snowflakes for this same thing. They didn't like the outcome.

But in 2020 there was a real reason to be upset. It's all about the reasons.

[Buford.Justice]

Kaz you are 100% wrong about your Flynn opinion. Sorry that my copy and pastes got to ya there but when I find good info I am going to do just that. I spend more time posting info with my own narrative and words on here than most do also BTW.

WHen it becomes obvious and factual that your nation is being couped and stolen with fake elections then yes, many retired military generals and patriotic citizens fell this way also.

With your kind of thinking they will be in total control of the country in less than two years. Many citizens feel the need to take action now or soon, and not wait until there complete ability to stop these people is gone.

It's time to quit listening to liberal medias crying conspiracy theory all the time as a weapon to continue to pacify the public.

There comes a point when many people need to wake up and admit they are being duped (you included it appears)

Now please continue to yawn and dismiss!!! hehe

Now you see where they are screeniing conservatives out of the military as unfit because of political beliefs for the nation. Yes they get to decide who is fit or unfit for the military. Does that not disturd you. Maybe not since you are dismissing Flynn's words and actions.

[Buford.Justice]

General Flynn was originally part of the Obama admin when he was Director of the Defense Intel Agency. During that time his unvarnished truths bumped up against those of the other alphabet soup agencies (CIA, NSA, etc.) advising the admin. There are those who know "what" the boss wants to hear and Flynn was not that guy. He spoke truths about what the boss "needed" to hear in regards to Iran and ISIS. Obama, and now Xiden, are definitely more pro-Iran than certainly Trump and previous administrations. Obama wanted badly to get the deal done with Iran (JCPOA) and Flynn was a voice against trusting Iran and their nuclear ambitions. That was strike one.

The other thing Obama's admin did was try to downplay a resurgent ISIS. Remember the comments about the JV team? Well, Flynn also spoke of how wrong they were about that. That was strike two. Flynn was out in 2014 and went on his own.

While out on his own and giving speeches and TV appearances he said things which made his continued unpopularity with Obama that much more profound. When he signed on as an advisor to the Trump campaign, that was strike three.

The Obama admin could not have a guy with his amount of insider knowledge of their own administration now working for the other side. The destruction of Michael Flynn had to begin, and it did.

They tried to paint Flynn as something of an agent, or friend of the Kremlin. At a get-together at Cambridge University he was in attendance along with former MI-6 chief Sir Richard Dearlove, and a name that has shown up time and again in the Russia Collusion hoax, Stephan Halper. At that meeting was a Russian born historian (English citizen) Svetlana Lohkova. They tried to paint her as a "honeypot" who was getting to Flynn. The story was outrageous and she sued for her reputation in regards to the story, the fabrication. But this was one of the first attempts to get at Flynn.

Now think about it. This guy was a three-star general with 33 years of service. Don't you think if any of the BS you've been fed about this guy somehow being a Russian agent was true it wouldn't be like one of the biggest stories of the decade? This is the stuff of a John LeCarre or Tom Clancy novel. Were talking another Aldridge Ames, or Kim Philby here! But no, this wasn't that BIG story because even the main stream press knew. This was smear job plain and simple and it was smear job engineered at the highest levels of Team Obama. Part of this smear job was to take focus away from Hillary's e-mail server, part of it to go after Trump.

So yeah, that was (and is) a sad situation. It was sad situation that people like Brennan, Clapper, Comey, and others had to go after Flynn to trip him up over details in regards to a perfectly appropriate conversation with Kislyak. Conversations that guys like John Kerry have with Iranians when he's (Kerry) giving secret details about Israeli operations in Syria. Only Flynn didn't give secret info to Kislyak. He was set up and tripped up by the cleverness of Comey and some FBI agents. Comey bragged about it, laughed about it. Yup, a sad situation. Comey, a guy who under oath can't remember, can't recall, has no recollection of so many things, yet has enough remembrance to write a couple books.

Who would have thought you'd need a lawyer present to speak with someone in the same government, the same administration, someone you'd regard as being on the same team? But he did have that conversation with those agents and he didn't have a lawyer and they screwed him. So yeah, that was a mistake on his part and he should have known better. That was the mistake of Michael Flynn.

Thank you sir for posting this spot on article concerning Flynn.

[kidrock]

Snowflakes survive very well in an ice cold world......just sayin.

I just think it's ironic these are the same people who was calling Democrat's in 2016 snowflakes for this same thing. They didn't like the outcome.

[Barbecueboy]

Snowflakes survive very well in an ice cold world......just sayin.

[kidrock]

Some of these snowflakes just can't accept they lost. Watch and see they will only believe this sham of this audit and not the two previous audits. We will be right where we are right now Biden the winner and Trump the loser.


They?.......Dont you mean all Americans!Its pretty evident, aint it?

Nope just some of you snowflakes

[kidrock]

You don't realize that you did not win this election. YOU lost in reality because Joe will destroy us all. Except the excluded elites. Are you going to bend over for them?

Yes I realize I didn't win this Election I was never a candidate you dumb ---.

[dirtMAN007]

general flynn was originally part of the obama admin when he was director of the defense intel agency. During that time his unvarnished truths bumped up against those of the other alphabet soup agencies (cia, nsa, etc.) advising the admin. There are those who know "what" the boss wants to hear and flynn was not that guy. He spoke truths about what the boss "needed" to hear in regards to iran and isis. Obama, and now xiden, are definitely more pro-iran than certainly trump and previous administrations. Obama wanted badly to get the deal done with iran (jcpoa) and flynn was a voice against trusting iran and their nuclear ambitions. That was strike one.

The other thing obama's admin did was try to downplay a resurgent isis. Remember the comments about the jv team? Well, flynn also spoke of how wrong they were about that. That was strike two. Flynn was out in 2014 and went on his own.

While out on his own and giving speeches and tv appearances he said things which made his continued unpopularity with obama that much more profound. When he signed on as an advisor to the trump campaign, that was strike three.

The obama admin could not have a guy with his amount of insider knowledge of their own administration now working for the other side. The destruction of michael flynn had to begin, and it did.

They tried to paint flynn as something of an agent, or friend of the kremlin. At a get-together at cambridge university he was in attendance along with former mi-6 chief sir richard dearlove, and a name that has shown up time and again in the russia collusion hoax, stephan halper. At that meeting was a russian born historian (english citizen) svetlana lohkova. They tried to paint her as a "honeypot" who was getting to flynn. The story was outrageous and she sued for her reputation in regards to the story, the fabrication. But this was one of the first attempts to get at flynn.

Now think about it. This guy was a three-star general with 33 years of service. Don't you think if any of the bs you've been fed about this guy somehow being a russian agent was true it wouldn't be like one of the biggest stories of the decade? This is the stuff of a john lecarre or tom clancy novel. Were talking another aldridge ames, or kim philby here! But no, this wasn't that big story because even the main stream press knew. This was smear job plain and simple and it was smear job engineered at the highest levels of team obama. Part of this smear job was to take focus away from hillary's e-mail server, part of it to go after trump.

So yeah, that was (and is) a sad situation. It was sad situation that people like brennan, clapper, comey, and others had to go after flynn to trip him up over details in regards to a perfectly appropriate conversation with kislyak. Conversations that guys like john kerry have with iranians when he's (kerry) giving secret details about israeli operations in syria. Only flynn didn't give secret info to kislyak. He was set up and tripped up by the cleverness of comey and some fbi agents. Comey bragged about it, laughed about it. Yup, a sad situation. Comey, a guy who under oath can't remember, can't recall, has no recollection of so many things, yet has enough remembrance to write a couple books.

Who would have thought you'd need a lawyer present to speak with someone in the same government, the same administration, someone you'd regard as being on the same team? But he did have that conversation with those agents and he didn't have a lawyer and they screwed him. So yeah, that was a mistake on his part and he should have known better. That was the mistake of michael flynn.

and there you have it .......................................you anti american scumbags !!!!!!!!!!