Black Issues

[Osiris1241]

So you do know how to use Google. So, which part of my source was a personal account or belief? I claimed that the term "civil war" was used for this conflict well before the 1960s and the source shows the CSA president describing the war as such. Doesn't matter what I or he thinks about the war itself. Davis merely mentioning the conflict as a civil war is the entirety of the proof needed.

[CIRF]

Do....Do you know how to properly do you man-bun and nails to meet the approval of all your PC clown posse?


an·ec·do·tal
/ˌanəkˈdōdl/
Learn to pronounce
adjective
(of an account) not necessarily true or reliable, because based on personal accounts rather than facts or research.

[Osiris1241]

Do... Do you know what anecdotal means?

[CIRF]

There is nothing anecdotal about it. NA claimed the term "civil war" was not used to describe the war until the 1960s. This book was written and published in the 1880s by a politician from the era and many times refers to the conflict as a civil war. The book also cites other sources that also refer to the war as such. In terms of this argument, this book provides the exact evidence needed to prove that this term was used well before the Civil Rights Movement.

Anecdotal whether you are honest enough and willing or smart enough to acknowledge the reality.

Now, go fix your man-bun pretty and do your nails real nice and spare the world the spurious ideological interpretations that you believe will support your PC BS.

[Osiris1241]

Also, a recent Pew Research study shows a higher percentage of African Americans are Christian (79%) than the percentage of White Americans (70%). A higher percentage of White Americans aren't religious at all (24%) than African Americans (18%) as well

[Osiris1241]

Since the left thinks backwards; I'll turn it around for them, ''origins is not the same as arrived". A Troll argues just to get their kicks. If they were a piglet, they would suckle from a boar hog, that is how confused they are, you know, Civil Rights.

If you're going to say "Origins is not the same as arrived", you should at least try to explain what you mean. Even if you use the word arrived instead of origins, the term civil war in terms of describing the conflict ARRIVED during the war itself. Also, this still isn't an argument about each sides perspective. It doesn't matter in this argument what the South decides to call the war, this is about you claiming nobody referred to it as The Civil War until the Civil Rights Movement. That specific claim is a lie and changing origins with arrived changes nothing.

[Osiris1241]

Anecdotal evidence.

There is nothing anecdotal about it. NA claimed the term "civil war" was not used to describe the war until the 1960s. This book was written and published in the 1880s by a politician from the era and many times refers to the conflict as a civil war. The book also cites other sources that also refer to the war as such. In terms of this argument, this book provides the exact evidence needed to prove that this term was used well before the Civil Rights Movement.

[NorthAlabama]

Since the left thinks backwards; I'll turn it around for them, ''origins is not the same as arrived". A Troll argues just to get their kicks. If they were a piglet, they would suckle from a boar hog, that is how confused they are, you know, Civil Rights.

[CIRF]

Anecdotal evidence.

[Osiris1241]

https://books.google.com/books/about/The_Rise_and_Fall_of_the_Confederate_Gov.html?id=G7QTAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&newbks=1&newbks_redir=0&gboemv=1

[CIRF]

The Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government can be downloaded for free from google

Links please.

[Osiris1241]

He can't explain away his blatant lie so he chooses to ignore it and go on another tangent. The term was used during the actual war and there is a huge amount of documented proof from the era. Despite your desire for it to be, this isn't even a moral argument, you made a claim to back up your views but had to lie to make it work.

[NorthAlabama]

There is a view point difference between the right and the left, 'arrived' is not the same as 'origins'........ There is a saying, "The winner of a war gets to write the history"...... The North wants to walk out with their heads held high and beating their chest with pride claiming a moral victory, the Yankee way, not solely the case because don't look in the closet. The South was beaten and demoralized. The view point is different among both sides with different words to describe the history, just like the White man and the Black man, different with different agendas, DNA and cultures. I'm starting to understand what it is like to be an Afro-American for America is NOT their ideal of a country; for this Nation was founded upon Whites and the Christians religion, not the tribal culture of an African, and not solely on the backs of Blacks, which is again claimed for an agenda. This Nation has to accept that, but Blacks are not allowing that to happen and continue to destroy America with 'Civil Rights' (Satan) as the platform. The African was looked upon as an Ape sub-human centuries ago, with known DNA now to prove certain things, researchers are stating to understand their smaller brains even more. BBC reported that Neanderthals (White Europeans), now to believe by some, 'originated' solely on their own, not from the one African Ape female, some 40,000 years ago. The fossil records are slim, but if this holds, Darwin got it half right and religion got it correct.

[Osiris1241]

The Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government can be downloaded for free from google

[CIRF]

This claim about the origins about the term Civil War is a blatant lie. The name was used literally during the war itself by the likes of Lincoln and the Supreme Court and many leaders and generals on both sides referred to the conflict as a civil war. Jefferson Davis literally said as such in his book "The Rise and Fall of the Confederate Government" in 1881. "The War Between the States" wasn't even a popular name until after the war either.

Links please.