Project 2025

[Buford.Justice]

In all but two states, electoral votes are winner-take-all.1 The candidate winning the popular vote normally receives all of that state's votes. Maine and Nebraska have taken a different approach. Using the congressional district method, these states allocate two electoral votes to the state popular vote winner, and then one electoral vote to the popular vote winner in each congressional district (2 in Maine, 3 in Nebraska).

Hmmmm? Did I read that right?

Winner take all, except for those two states..... So, are they getting to change the rules again this time. Just start cleansing the internet of the actual law and truth and load it with Google based selective and censored information, maybe the electors get to make the choices instead of the voters????? biased political jealot electors of course.

At this point I'm not sure I even want to know how and who chooses electors.

I'm sure it's totally nonpartisan and completely fair though.


Do I? Bueller!!!!!

[Buford.Justice]

Western Journal poll.

Are you voting against Biden?

Yes: 97% (374 Votes)
No: 3% (13 Votes)

Nothing to see here!!!

[Raceready]

Western Journal poll.Are you voting against Biden?Yes: 97% (374 Votes)No: 3% (13 Votes)Nothing to see here!!!

I can't believe 3% are actually that dumb ?

[Raceready]

[QUOTE=Rich_Storms;2480870]You suppose that 3% is part of the Pierce posse??

[Buford.Justice]

You went on a rant again.

Actually, these are not rants. They are "elaborate, detailed, and informative replies.

[Raceready]

[QUOTE=Raceready;2480888]

You suppose that 3% is part of the Pierce posse??

Had you been hi-jacking my User name again ?

[fastford]

fastford, if trump wins the popular vote in a landslide, and does not get enough electoral votes to confirm him as president, will you still be in favor of the electoral college?

yes i will .....

[Buford.Justice]

As recently as 2016, seven electors broke with their state on the presidential ballot, and six did so on the vice presidential ballot. Some of these faithless electors were replaced or fined for their rogue votes, but their votes did not affect the election’s outcome.

I guess electors could go against the popular vote take all. And the Dem party could pay their fines with our tax money.

We are done if enough electors actually go rogue. And the electoral college would no longer be serving it's purpose.

[lurker]

Thanks for the reply fastford

[Buford.Justice]

ss Are you calliing this a cult?

[ss12]

lurker I posted the above video that actually starts discussing Project 2025 with Solomon discussing it, at about the 1:10 mark, I implied I approved of the video and the concept. Videos have a web address and I can't quote a video, I can just post the address and leave it to the viewer.

I did see after I posted the video that there are many outlets trying to distort and discredit the concept.

It's my opinion that the government must be cleaned up and the voting system is broken. So nothing will be fixed without a plan.

The constitution actually states that the people accually have the right to recall people in government such as the house, and senate. This present power grab seems to keep things like this unknown, thus they remain above the laws and constitution. It needs to end.

In the case of California, it is so far gone that they can't even recall the governor, as shown a couple years ago. Madmen like Gavin Newson have taken total control and if other states continue this pattern the nation is over.

Back to the top

[fastford]

Back to the top

where you been bro ???? what you think about your new candidate , she far left enough for ya ????? just curious ...