Epstein………

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • lurker
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2017
    • 3186

    #106

    Originally posted by Tyy7777 View Post
    I think my point was actually about a wider range of
    Originally posted by Tyy7777 View Post
    higher quality sources considered to be centrist.

    I’ve posted higher quality sources and you typically <to always> denounce them —- as well, you hate my comparatives, when they are spot-on right. I know other readers agree with me, as I’m told.


    You asked me not to use comparatives, so I stopped. For now!

    Comment

    • lurker
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2017
      • 3186

      #107

      Originally posted by Tyy7777 View Post
      Kiriakou is on the Russian payroll. He's a whistleblower who wants the spotlight.



      So that makes him, what?


      Ineligible to articulate truthful matters in this case?


      Or is he just lying?

      Comment

      • Tyy7777
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2024
        • 596

        #108
        Originally posted by lurker View Post
        [COLOR=#000000][FONT=Comic Sans MS]


        I’ve posted higher quality sources and you typically <to always> denounce them —- as well, you hate my comparatives, when they are spot-on right. I know other readers agree with me, as I’m told.


        You asked me not to use comparatives, so I stopped. For now!
        HQ sources like?

        Comment

        • Tyy7777
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2024
          • 596

          #109
          Originally posted by lurker View Post



          So that makes him, what?


          Ineligible to articulate truthful matters in this case?


          Or is he just lying?
          Well it shows the kinda person he is.

          He's been known to embellish stories.

          Comment

          • lurker
            Senior Member
            • Dec 2017
            • 3186

            #110

            Originally posted by Tyy7777 View Post
            HQ sources like?



            I’ll footnote it next time I use one.

            Comment

            • lurker
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2017
              • 3186

              #111

              Originally posted by Tyy7777 View Post
              He's been known to embellish stories.



              That’s like the pot calling the kettle black.

              Comment

              • Tyy7777
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2024
                • 596

                #112
                Originally posted by lurker View Post



                That’s like the pot calling the kettle black.
                Sure buddy.

                On another note why haven't you responded to my Epstein email postings over on page 2?

                Comment

                • lurker
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2017
                  • 3186

                  #113
                  Originally posted by Tyy7777 View Post
                  On another note why haven't you responded to my Epstein email postings over on page 2?

                  Because you said —-


                  Originally posted by Tyy7777 View Post
                  Now I'm not writing this post because I want argument, so don't bother.


                  Comment

                  • lurker
                    Senior Member
                    • Dec 2017
                    • 3186

                    #114

                    Originally posted by Tyy7777 View Post
                    That's just the beginning, there's heaps more.



                    Heaps? Really?


                    If you’re going to hold your narrative, man up and post your “dirt” evidence. You keep saying it, so the onus is on you to prove it, so post away.

                    Comment

                    • lurker
                      Senior Member
                      • Dec 2017
                      • 3186

                      #115

                      Originally posted by Tyy7777 View Post
                      Sure buddy.



                      Called it like I see it.

                      Comment

                      • Tyy7777
                        Senior Member
                        • Mar 2024
                        • 596

                        #116
                        Originally posted by lurker View Post


                        Because you said —-



                        What I meant was I didn't want to argue whether or not rape is bad because you clearly have some wicked views.

                        Comment

                        • lurker
                          Senior Member
                          • Dec 2017
                          • 3186

                          #117

                          Originally posted by Tyy7777 View Post
                          What I meant was I didn't want to argue whether or not rape is bad because you clearly have some wicked views.



                          Rape is bad. I Never said or insinuated otherwise. What’s so wicked about that? Stop twisting things to meet your narrative.

                          Comment

                          • lurker
                            Senior Member
                            • Dec 2017
                            • 3186

                            #118

                            Originally posted by Tyy7777 View Post
                            That's just the beginning, there's heaps more.



                            We're all still waiting for you to post your “heaps more” dirt.

                            Comment

                            • Tyy7777
                              Senior Member
                              • Mar 2024
                              • 596

                              #119
                              (Some) files are out.

                              Fox News Digital has learned that the same redaction standards (as victims) were applied to politically exposed individuals and government officials.

                              Convenient, isn't it? This violates s 2(b)(1) of the Epstein Files Transparency Act which states that "No record shall be withheld, delayed, or redacted on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary."

                              Comment

                              • ss12
                                Senior Member
                                • May 2007
                                • 3731

                                #120
                                Ty, it’s obvious from the convicted felon’s actions that he’s hiding something, otherwise those files would have been released ages ago. Now people will assume he’s also a pedophile for keeping the Epstein files under wraps, and the link to Jeffrey Epstein will haunt him for the rest of his life.
                                Haters don't really hate you, in fact they hate themselves because you are a reflection of what they wish to be.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X