Tweet
OMG! Senate forces SURPRISE VOTE on Epstein Files…AND IT PASSES!!
Will the convicted felon choose to sign or veto? His turn!!
Will the convicted felon choose to sign or veto? His turn!!
-
Last edited by ss12; 11-18-2025, 09:16 PM.Haters don't really hate you, in fact they hate themselves because you are a reflection of what they wish to be. -
Guarantee he signs. What will be your excuse when there's no dirt on him?
You can be the laughing stock on the tailgate section then.
Oh wait, you already are the laughing stock on the tailgate section.🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂8/13/16 -
He's had plenty of time to remove the dirt.Originally posted by Highside Hustler25 View PostComment
-
LOL, the pedophile convicted felon only has two choices when a bill comes to him: sign it or veto it. With a 427-1 vote in the House and 100-0 in the Senate, he really has no choice but to sign it into law. The Republicans played this smart. After finding out he was all over Epstein’s files, they needed an escape route. Not only did they find one, but now he has to sign the very bill that could destroy him. I’d rather be the laughingstock of 4 million than the laughingstock of the world like those who support a pedophile convicted felon.Haters don't really hate you, in fact they hate themselves because you are a reflection of what they wish to be.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by ss12 View Post
Hey, you're a convicted felon of being banned from 4m so you and Trump have the convicted felon part in common.
Comment
-
Was that "felony" the one that was originally a misdemeanor but Tish James decided to prosecute it as a felony even though most legal observers say it probably wouldn't have been prosecuted at all since there was no actual victim? Was that the one that had to do with the listing of property values, loans and paying back those loans? That "felony"? The one that she campaigned on? Good to know we had a fair impartial and totally disconnected justice system that operated completely independent of political party apparatus.
Yup, got it. Good to know.Political correctness,...is the inability to speak the truth about the obvious.Comment
-
So what have we learned from the first couple drips and drabs of this Epstein stuff?
Stacey Plaskett the Democrat Rep from the US Virgin Islands was actually being fed questions from Epstein during a congressional hearing in 2019. Plaskett once worked for a law firm which had a connection to Epstein, before she so famously became a prosecutor and then a representative (non-voting rep). Because yeah, anyone of us guys can text our Congressman in the middle of a hearing and say - ask this one next, yeah "Good job".
Larry Summers, who was a cabinet member for Clinton and high level advisor to Obama was using Epstein as his "wing man" to help him hook up with a Chinese economist, who happened to be a daughter of a high level CCP official. Yeah, Larry really put his Harvard brain to work on that project. I guess even with Harvard credentials you can think with the wrong head.
Jasmine Crockett. The dime store Cardi B gift that keeps on giving. She gets on the floor of the House and starts naming names of people who got donations from "a Jeffrey Epstein" and called out Lee Zeldin for what her staff found in the FEC filings. Apparently her staff is as stupid as she is because the Jeffrey Epstein who gave money to Zeldin was a physician from Long Island and made the donations after the famous Epstein was already dead. Jasmine is apparently a lawyer. Well, it is called practicing law for a reason. Because not everyone gets it right. You can look up FEC filings and within a couple minutes discover that addresses and dates just don't link up. But, if you're playing to a stupid crowd....they probably will believe the stupid stuff.
Keep it coming. Epstein was way more connected to the left than the right.Political correctness,...is the inability to speak the truth about the obvious.Comment
-
Morgs, the anti-Trumpers aren't looking for that kind of “dirt” —- that kind of dirt is irrelevant to them. They want the Trump raping and molesting 14yr old girls “dirt”. You know, the “Trump is a 1ucking perverted creep” stuff.Comment
-
If there was something in those files that implicated DJT we'd have heard about from Hillary in 2016. Guaranteed.Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Tyy7777 View Post
You’ve been awful quite. Where‘s the “dirt” you were talking about?
Comment
-
Think about this one.
Both Bill and Hillary Clinton have received congressional subpoenas to come testify in the Epstein case. Both Bill and Hillary Clinton have ignored their congressional subpoenas.
Now contrast when both Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro ignored congressional subpoenas. They both were thrown in the klink for that by the Biden DOJ. So, should the Trump DOJ do the same in this matter? I mean really, if the DOJ is so independent and above it all like someone would like us to believe than shouldn't the reactions to ignoring congressional subpoenas be dealt with in like and similar ways?
I think we understand that if Bill and Hillary were brought to testimony it would be awkward and embarrassing to hear the - I don't recall, I don't remember, I plead the Fifth, are we still talking about this, at this point what difference does it make, or just flat out being caught in lies. Having Epstein to the White House 17 times and riding on his plane at least 26 times I'm sure Bill could shed some light on things but I'd also hazard a guess that his memory is probably starting to go (rather conveniently).
Also consider this. Does anyone think if Harris actually pulled off a miracle and won and this Epstein stuff was still out there, would the Dems have voted for the release in the same manner as they did under this administration? Would Harris have signed the bill? Sure, ya, you betcha.Political correctness,...is the inability to speak the truth about the obvious.Comment
-
Originally posted by Morgs153 View Post
I can hear it now. —---- “that's another conversation for another day”.
Comment
-
**** Crickets ****Comment
Comment