Another piece falls into place.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • halfast07
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 518

    #1

    Another piece falls into place.

    Since when does a plain wedding band need repairs, along with your watch, for a whole month?


    Another piece falls into place.

    In a press conference last week Obama was not wearing his wedding ring nor was he wearing his watch. When noticed, his staff said his ring was out for repairs. No reason was given for the missing watch.

    So it's just a coincidence that Muslims are forbidden from wearing jewelry during the month of Ramadan . Can't possibly be that, because although he hasn't gone to a Christian church service since entering the White House, we know he's a committed Christian "cause he said so during his campaign!" ...........And I've got a bridge to nowhere to sell you also.

    This is the same president that spent the Christmas holidays in Hawaii to avoid religious obligations as PRESIDENT at the White House. His children do not receive Christmas presents.

    Let's just face the facts and quit trying to distort the truth, we have a Muslim for president in the White House, and he has no knowledge of American history.


    Please pass this on to believers of what is happening to our Great Nation and to those who are still in denial . Why do people lie for him?
    Obama 4 and no more!unless we can impeach him first!
  • halfast07
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2008
    • 518

    #2
    Snopes is a liberal organization and has no credibility in my book any more
    !!!
    Obama 4 and no more!unless we can impeach him first!

    Comment

    • halfast07
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2008
      • 518

      #3
      How about this one Kid??
      Obama 4 and no more!unless we can impeach him first!

      Comment

      • halfast07
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2008
        • 518

        #4
        the man does nothing but swing a golf club once in awhile...how could he damage his wedding band??? i am a machinist and have had mine on for 27 years and have never damaged it!!!!!
        Obama 4 and no more!unless we can impeach him first!

        Comment

        • Clayton_Wetter
          Banned
          • May 2007
          • 16671

          #5
          factcheck.org yet another left wing created site to actually debunk facts.

          Comment

          • anthonycacace
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2008
            • 267

            #6
            Seroiusly?

            Creditability was left at the door with such a statement as follows, "Although he hasn't gone to a Christian church service since entering the White House."

            Here is a news org (ABC) and a different year Drudge Report showing two instances where the above statement is false.


            Matt Drudge is an Internet journalist and muckraker. Drudge's web site, Drudge Report (begun in 1994), consists primarily of links to stories about politics, entertainment, and various current events, and to many popular columnists, although Drudge occasionally authors a story of his own. Drudge started his website on a 486 computer from an apartment in Hollywood, California.


            If the writer had said Obama has RARELY gone or INFREQUENTLY attended, then OK. But, the statement is he HASN'T [EVER] gone. Which, as shown above, is obviously not true.
            Last edited by anthonycacace; 09-07-2012, 08:14 AM. Reason: readability

            Comment

            • mudslinger47
              Banned
              • May 2007
              • 3452

              #7
              And I suppose thats good enough for you, huh Tony. You don't spend the kind of money obummer does on keeping his records sealed cause your a straight up guy. AND our news media can get top secret stories out of DC but can't seem to find a crack in the college records system. Ya, right. No media bias here. B-Rock church attendance was campaign oriented, no other reason.

              Duane

              Comment

              • anthonycacace
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2008
                • 267

                #8
                Geez, you guys won't even trust your own biased media anymore? I included the Drudge article for a reason ya know. If this is the case, why bother posting such garbage on the board at all? Also, the ABC story is from 2011 and no Presidential election took place during that year.
                Last edited by anthonycacace; 09-07-2012, 09:24 PM. Reason: additional opinion/readability

                Comment

                • mudslinger47
                  Banned
                  • May 2007
                  • 3452

                  #9
                  I never said he didn't go to the church, I just said it was campaign oriented. Pay attention dude!!!

                  Duane

                  Comment

                  • LITE-INN
                    Banned
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 12473

                    #10
                    he can't he's a liberal

                    Comment

                    • anthonycacace
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2008
                      • 267

                      #11
                      Lite - Being a certain political affiliation or another, does not affect ones ability to concentrate. I did not miss that Mud mentioned attendance was campaign oriented. In fact, I addressed this by noting, "Also, the ABC story is from 2011 and no Presidential election took place during that year." Seems pretty clear that I read and responded to this angle.

                      Mud - True, you twice noted attendance 'was' campaign oriented. However, the use of was indicates a past, opposed to present, act. The problem with this argument is that both articles come AFTER Obama's election and as such that negates the need to continue his presence for his election purposes. If you meant, "His attendance IS campaign oriented," then OK, but that is not what you wrote in either case.

                      All these ideas have done is simply further prove my original point. A case is made, a hole is blown through it because of poor word choice, and thus it becomes an inaccurate assessment. Conclusion, others are likely the ones who should pay more attention.

                      Comment

                      • LITE-INN
                        Banned
                        • Feb 2008
                        • 12473

                        #12
                        then explain biden and obama

                        Comment

                        • Clayton_Wetter
                          Banned
                          • May 2007
                          • 16671

                          #13
                          Originally posted by anthonycacace View Post
                          Lite - Being a certain political affiliation or another, does not affect ones ability to concentrate. I did not miss that Mud mentioned attendance was campaign oriented. In fact, I addressed this by noting, "Also, the ABC story is from 2011 and no Presidential election took place during that year." Seems pretty clear that I read and responded to this angle.

                          Mud - True, you twice noted attendance 'was' campaign oriented. However, the use of was indicates a past, opposed to present, act. The problem with this argument is that both articles come AFTER Obama's election and as such that negates the need to continue his presence for his election purposes. If you meant, "His attendance IS campaign oriented," then OK, but that is not what you wrote in either case.

                          All these ideas have done is simply further prove my original point. A case is made, a hole is blown through it because of poor word choice, and thus it becomes an inaccurate assessment. Conclusion, others are likely the ones who should pay more attention.
                          Anthony is Obama a straight up honest man?

                          Comment

                          • racin6mod
                            Senior Member
                            • Feb 2008
                            • 2172

                            #14
                            Originally posted by anthonycacace View Post
                            Geez, you guys won't even trust your own biased media anymore? I included the Drudge article for a reason ya know. If this is the case, why bother posting such garbage on the board at all? Also, the ABC story is from 2011 and no Presidential election took place during that year.
                            anyone or any web site that disagrees just once is labeled just that quick it's called the limba sindruim.the right have it bad.who's the guy that voted with the gop 99 % of the time and only once voted with his head and they black balled his a ss

                            Comment

                            • Clayton_Wetter
                              Banned
                              • May 2007
                              • 16671

                              #15
                              Originally posted by racin6mod View Post
                              anyone or any web site that disagrees just once is labeled just that quick it's called the limba sindruim.the right have it bad.who's the guy that voted with the gop 99 % of the time and only once voted with his head and they black balled his a ss
                              Are you bought (with false lies and entitlements) or just brainwashed????? lol

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X