Johnson on track to get title number 6.

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • StuckInReverse
    Senior Member
    • Jul 2007
    • 203

    #1

    Johnson on track to get title number 6.

    Anyone disagree? 1 win away from being tied with Keselowsy for the most; 17 tops fives; 23 top tens.

    Two more wins are possible, meaning he would lead everything except poles. I'd say the points are working, even though he's far from my favorite driver.

    edit: he's only 1 behind in number of poles as well
  • LITE-INN
    Banned
    • Feb 2008
    • 12473

    #2
    and your point

    Comment

    • racin6mod
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2008
      • 2172

      #3
      anything can happen with 3 races left and unlike the tv brains I think the 5 car or the 15 car could still have a shot if there's a wreck or blown engine or who knows but I'm allready sick of the new hot nascar term (the 6 pack) you'll be hearing that all weekend.

      Comment

      • Clayton_Wetter
        Banned
        • May 2007
        • 16671

        #4
        Originally posted by LITE-INN View Post
        and your point
        And your point???

        Comment

        • Clayton_Wetter
          Banned
          • May 2007
          • 16671

          #5
          JJ wins again!

          Comment

          • awnunn
            Senior Member
            • May 2007
            • 858

            #6
            He wins again thanks to jumping the restart an Nascar looking the other way.
            NO RESERVE SEATING and BLACKSLICK IS MY PREFERENCE

            Comment

            • bite me too
              Senior Member
              • May 2007
              • 795

              #7
              jump the start..by what 2 inches?

              He would've won anyway...he had 4 tires compared to Kesolowski's 2.
              www.ctcphotos.com

              http://www.ctcphotos.com/hommel.htm

              "If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under." - Ronald Reagan

              Comment

              • LITE-INN
                Banned
                • Feb 2008
                • 12473

                #8
                jumpiing the start is jumping the start should 've been put to the tail

                Comment

                • bite me too
                  Senior Member
                  • May 2007
                  • 795

                  #9
                  the transponders couldn't tell the difference...maybe the 2's transponder was 2 inches closer to the front of the car...
                  www.ctcphotos.com

                  http://www.ctcphotos.com/hommel.htm

                  "If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under." - Ronald Reagan

                  Comment

                  • bite me too
                    Senior Member
                    • May 2007
                    • 795

                    #10
                    oh wait. the 2, as the leader, supposably jump the next to the last restart (per the 48 and 18). but, the 48 actually got to the line first, as the 2nd place car, on the last restart....so who should've been put to the back?
                    www.ctcphotos.com

                    http://www.ctcphotos.com/hommel.htm

                    "If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under." - Ronald Reagan

                    Comment

                    • LITE-INN
                      Banned
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 12473

                      #11
                      Originally posted by bite me too View Post
                      the transponders couldn't tell the difference...maybe the 2's transponder was 2 inches closer to the front of the car...
                      hendrick has more pull than penske

                      Comment

                      • Highside Hustler25
                        Senior Member
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 12911

                        #12
                        Congrats Jimmy J.
                        8/13/16

                        Comment

                        • LITE-INN
                          Banned
                          • Feb 2008
                          • 12473

                          #13
                          who and he11 is j .j in 2012

                          Comment

                          Working...
                          X