Tweet
Ok, folks, help me out here, there is something that isn’t right with this Benghazi deal going on with Panetta’s testimony today. When he was asked about the timeline of his visits with the President, he stated that he talked to the President at 5:15 on 9-11 and had no further conversations with him, the President told him “handle itâ€, do what ever it takes and then bailed. OK, think about this, I don’t think he can do that, because Panetta or the head of the Joint Chiefs can not give the order singularly to launch an attack on a foreign country. Their covering something up they don’t want the President to be involved with. Think about this, this administration does everything within its power to make this President look like he is on top of everything. Think about the statement about guns and the President never shooting, next morning, low and behold there you have a picture of the President supposedly skeet shooting at eye level. OK fine. Pick out any even that happens and his handlers have him front and center for the camera right away, showing him engaged, like the picture for when they got OSB, there the President was in all his radiant beauty sweating’ out every detail. But now on Benghazi, he was no where in sight? He just handed the whole thing to Panetta? Really? You actually think he’d do that with out a reason? This President has never done anything that showed he was not engaged in any situation, but all of a sudden on Benghazi he’s napping? They had no contact from the President from about 5:15 on for about 9 hours, why? Where was he? The President is directly responsible for his Ambassadors, did he just blow this situation off? It seems as though he’d like everyone to think that and thanks to Rand Paul, maybe we know why. Gun running out of the embassy down there. Obama thinks the hit of him being disconnected from the attack sequence will be far far less then getting caught in another gun running scheme . This way, when it come to light, he can stand up front of the crowd and say he had nothing to do with any of it and in hind sight he’ll say I should have been more engaged. So we know that guns were involved cause they had the captain of a boat tell them he was hauling guns to Libya, via Turkey, hence the reason for the Turkish diplomat to be down there for the earlier dinner engagement. And who is getting the guns? Why its our good friends the good ole Muslim Brotherhood, (for the Syrian Rebels) same jokers that are getting F-16’s and tanks in Egypt. Ain’t things starting to stink just a little bit? Keep in mind here, there is a CIA safe house about a block away from the embassy and they Administration complained there wasn't sufficiant intel, really? I ain't buyin' that their trying to sell...
One point to make, there were 9 hours to get reinforcements in there, there were forces less then two hours away, I'm not jumping on the Military, but someone didn't give the order for a reason...
There were about 30 or so other people that were rescued from that attack, where are they? And where is the media asking "where are they". Certainly a lot of questions to get answers for. Of course, according to Hilary, who cares....
_________________
One point to make, there were 9 hours to get reinforcements in there, there were forces less then two hours away, I'm not jumping on the Military, but someone didn't give the order for a reason...
There were about 30 or so other people that were rescued from that attack, where are they? And where is the media asking "where are they". Certainly a lot of questions to get answers for. Of course, according to Hilary, who cares....
_________________
Comment