cable news tv hosts,

[buster83]

the point is are they any good in bed we know they cannot remember where they chit last that is just nature of women,or there brain just goes blank sometimes is normal.most of the time you take them out of bed or out of kitchen they are lost.

[mudslinger47]

the point is are they any good in bed we know they cannot remember where they chit last that is just nature of women,or there brain just goes blank sometimes is normal.most of the time you take them out of bed or out of kitchen they are lost.

OH!!!! Your talking about Diane Sawyer, why didn't ya say so.... or was it Bella Absug?

[DirtClassic]

Robin Meade CNN Morning Show

Robin seems to be a very down to earth girl, who tell us the news in a wholesome way....almost like she is Family....

http://www.zimbio.com/Robin+Meade/articles/I4jskBXGCvt/Sexy+Robin+Meade+Pictures

[Bubstr]

Okay, let's hear one, just one Republican talking point used by, let's say Megan Kelly? Just one.

I see you want me to teach you what to think. The art of slanting news is not always what they say, but what they don't say. Look back to the republican nomination race. Your girl Megan was on the omit bandwagon with the rest of FOX news. That was talking points or non talking points. Watch this clip of an entertainer that puts out news that has more fact than the Fox news bunch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSbkFpAA4CA

Now ask your self why would they do this, when their job is unbiased news. This type of slanting touches almost every news story to some degree. Some get sucked in because a news source tells them what they want to hear. You evidently need someone to tell you what you need to know, not what they want you to know. I'm not saying the Right channel or left channel is best. I'm telling you to question what they say or don't say. I'm telling you to learn how to think for yourself.

There are a lot of clips on U Tube where Megan and others cut the opposition off, rather than letting them explain their view. This is slanting also. An unbiased reporter wants all sides of a story included. Take note of some of these clips. Put your opinion aside and tell me if all sides of the story where fairly explained.

http://us.yhs4.search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?hspart=Babylon&hsimp=yhs-002&type=woolik6&p=megan%20kelly%20fox%20news%20utube

[CIRF]

I see you want me to teach you what to think. The art of slanting news is not always what they say, but what they don't say. Look back to the republican nomination race. Your girl Megan was on the omit bandwagon with the rest of FOX news. That was talking points or non talking points. Watch this clip of an entertainer that puts out news that has more fact than the Fox news bunch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSbkFpAA4CA

Now ask your self why would they do this, when their job is unbiased news. This type of slanting touches almost every news story to some degree. Some get sucked in because a news source tells them what they want to hear. You evidently need someone to tell you what you need to know, not what they want you to know. I'm not saying the Right channel or left channel is best. I'm telling you to question what they say or don't say. I'm telling you to learn how to think for yourself.

There are a lot of clips on U Tube where Megan and others cut the opposition off, rather than letting them explain their view. This is slanting also. An unbiased reporter wants all sides of a story included. Take note of some of these clips. Put your opinion aside and tell me if all sides of the story where fairly explained.
http://us.yhs4.search.yahoo.com/yhs/...20news%20utube

Cut the bullsh!t and stay on point. You said they're all "young, dumb and can't think for their self" (sic) (it's themselves). Prove that they're "young, dumb and can't think for their self" (sic) (it's themselves). Gotta' have something more substantial than your opinion when all evidence is to the contrary.

[Bubstr]

Cut the bullsh!t and stay on point. You said they're all "young, dumb and can't think for their self" (sic) (it's themselves). Prove that they're "young, dumb and can't think for their self" (sic) (it's themselves). Gotta' have something more substantial than your opinion when all evidence is to the contrary.

You wouldn't know what evidence is if it smacked you in the forehead. Did you even look at the clips? They blindly do the bidding of their corporate owners. Make it entertaining, supply the network view. Yes Sir Massa.

Your self is singular. Do you think for your self or are you plural and part of themselves, that blindly think what they are told to think?

By the way. I;m not an English Major, but if my views are not understood, It's a matter of comprehension, not explanation. It is better to know your excrement that to be able to spew your excrement.

[skids]

I see you want me to teach you what to think. The art of slanting news is not always what they say, but what they don't say. Look back to the republican nomination race. Your girl Megan was on the omit bandwagon with the rest of FOX news. That was talking points or non talking points. Watch this clip of an entertainer that puts out news that has more fact than the Fox news bunch.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSbkFpAA4CA

Now ask your self why would they do this, when their job is unbiased news. This type of slanting touches almost every news story to some degree. Some get sucked in because a news source tells them what they want to hear. You evidently need someone to tell you what you need to know, not what they want you to know. I'm not saying the Right channel or left channel is best. I'm telling you to question what they say or don't say. I'm telling you to learn how to think for yourself.

There are a lot of clips on U Tube where Megan and others cut the opposition off, rather than letting them explain their view. This is slanting also. An unbiased reporter wants all sides of a story included. Take note of some of these clips. Put your opinion aside and tell me if all sides of the story where fairly explained.
http://us.yhs4.search.yahoo.com/yhs/...20news%20utube

I have a little trouble taking you seriously when the first example in your link is headlined "Megan Kelly farts on live TV".

The only reason people have issues with Fox is that they dare to present the conservative side of the issues (in a noncritical way). Instead of debating real topics, critics seem to think they must resort to name calling and falsely characterizing their personnel (i.e. young, dumb and can't think for themselves).

Why can't you just admit that, while these female Fox hosts are attractive, they are actually intelligent as well? Is that so hard to admit? Do you really think they could hold the degrees they do by being "young and dumb"?

[Clayton_Wetter]

Skids, that's what I was thinking also.

[Bubstr]

I have a little trouble taking you seriously when the first example in your link is headlined "Megan Kelly farts on live TV".

The only reason people have issues with Fox is that they dare to present the conservative side of the issues (in a noncritical way). Instead of debating real topics, critics seem to think they must resort to name calling and falsely characterizing their personnel (i.e. young, dumb and can't think for themselves).

Why can't you just admit that, while these female Fox hosts are attractive, they are actually intelligent as well? Is that so hard to admit? Do you really think they could hold the degrees they do by being "young and dumb"?

The first link led to this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=iHIYoMMuUzs
Make no mistake about your dear Megan talking over the opposing view and threatening to shut her mike down. Is that a prime example of unbiased news? I can't say I agree with the opposing view, but it should be aired in an unbiased news cast. Tell me how you feel about Al Gore saying the debate is over on man made global warming, when there was no debate? That was biased, right? The answer is yes. shake your head up and down. Megan's clip is no better. Nothing to say about the first clip about Ron Paul?

They are dumb, just because they do the bidding of the network rather than being an unbiased news reporter. The key word is reporter, not news maker or twister. If they are intelligent, they are using it to twist and slant, not do what is expected of a news source. Should we add devious to Dumb or instead of? You can put the label on it any way you want, but they aren't doing you any favors or anyone else that relies on them to influence their opinions. I would suggest you watch all the Sock Puppets from all the networks. At least you can see the opposite views and make up your own mind.

[mudslinger47]

The first link led to this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature...&v=iHIYoMMuUzs
Make no mistake about your dear Megan talking over the opposing view and threatening to shut her mike down. Is that a prime example of unbiased news? I can't say I agree with the opposing view, but it should be aired in an unbiased news cast. Tell me how you feel about Al Gore saying the debate is over on man made global warming, when there was no debate? That was biased, right? The answer is yes. shake your head up and down. Megan's clip is no better. Nothing to say about the first clip about Ron Paul?

They are dumb, just because they do the bidding of the network rather than being an unbiased news reporter. The key word is reporter, not news maker or twister. If they are intelligent, they are using it to twist and slant, not do what is expected of a news source. Should we add devious to Dumb or instead of? You can put the label on it any way you want, but they aren't doing you any favors or anyone else that relies on them to influence their opinions. I would suggest you watch all the Sock Puppets from all the networks. At least you can see the opposite views and make up your own mind.

I suppose you missed the show when Chris Mathews threw Michelle Malkin off his program because he disagreed with her.... ahh whats that again? Oh and he ain't Fox News either. I rarely watch TV news, but when I do I watch Fox, by far the most objective news available delivered by the most diverse around....

[Bubstr]

I suppose you missed the show when Chris Mathews threw Michelle Malkin off his program because he disagreed with her.... ahh whats that again? Oh and he ain't Fox News either. I rarely watch TV news, but when I do I watch Fox, by far the most objective news available delivered by the most diverse around....

You pretty much made my case. These so called news shows only offer biased accounts. It doesn't matter what side or political affiliation. These news reporters forgot what the job entailed. Just how stupid do you have to be, to put out such a product and think your a news reporter?

[mudslinger47]

You pretty much made my case. These so called news shows only offer biased accounts. It doesn't matter what side or political affiliation. These news reporters forgot what the job entailed. Just how stupid do you have to be, to put out such a product and think your a news reporter?

Sounds as though your talking about ABC NBC & CBS and their derivatives..... Pretty obvious you don't watch Fox "NEWS". Not the talking heads, the news. The Blaze News is pretty good too.

[t.nie]

No one is ever going to call what Fox does News. Never in a million years. And for the record, all the people you guys are referring to as "News Reporters" are NOT news reporters at all. They are paid schills for their lobbying groups, corporate backers, whatever. Chris Matthews isn't a reporter, nor is Rachel Maddow, nor is Sean Hannity.

It just so happens that the worst offenders for misrepresentation, misleading the public and generally ginning up hatred and malice are the right wing talking heads in their echo chamber. It's all hate and malice from that bunch, but of course, whenever the little people start getting organized the rich folk go nuts and start firing up their hate and malice machine to start rumors, smear the little guy, mislead the ignorant and generally try to EFF UP democracy as much as possible.

What the right wing echo chamber hates more than anything is truth getting out.

You can't sell greed and selfishness to the American people, but you can sell them race hatred, fear of the foreigner, fear of WMD, fear of anything that will make them vote for you and not the people that will take action to level the playing field.

When you look at the right wing echo chamber, that's all it amounts to. People paying talking heads a LOT of money to sell fear, hatred and malice to a certain segment of society, so that segment will oppose any changes that will threaten the Old Boy Network from keeping all their stuff and taking more of everyone else's.

And now people mistake the right wing echo chamber and the right wing propaganda channel for news. It's quite the amazing success story, too bad it destroys our nation and our democracy while making a few people very wealthy.

[t.nie]

I suppose you missed the show when Chris Mathews threw Michelle Malkin off his program because he disagreed with her.... ahh whats that again? Oh and he ain't Fox News either. I rarely watch TV news, but when I do I watch Fox, by far the most objective news available delivered by the most diverse around....

Yeah, and I guess you would deny that Sean Hannity and Bill OReilly constantly belittle, bully and shout down anyone who starts speaking the truth on their shows, either?

I've watched Matthews go toe to toe with people. If he tossed Malkin, it was for good cause. She is the most hateful obnoxious little turd I have ever seen, which is why she does so well on Oreilly and Hannity. They love her because she is willing to be a lunatic.

I head something today that I thought was quite amusing. 3 guards are keeping 100 mentally deranged people in line at the asylum. Someone comes along and says "dont you need more than 3 guards for 100 mentally deranged people?" and the guards says "naaaa... mentally deranged people can never get organized enough to be a threat.."

I immediately thought of the modern day Republican Party and all of its splintered factions all the way to the Tea People. Just a bunch of lunatics who can't get organized, they're no threat any more. Just look at Boehner in the House, he can't get that herd of cats in line to do anything apart from another vote to defund or repeal Obamacare for the 57th time, another pointless move that gets nothing real done.... Lol.

[LITE-INN]

please tnie put down the weed http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Matthews