Busch And The Championship

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • A ron
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2014
    • 294

    #31
    Whether we think it can or can't happen, it's a hole they left open. Ryan Newman nearly won the whole deal running 15th all year. Enjoy the "hell of a show" while you can because after Jr hangs it up, they will be lucky to be broadcast as a taped delay of highlights like bowling is today.

    Comment

    • t.nie
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2008
      • 1146

      #32
      This has been an interesting read.

      I think it's favoritism to make a special provision for one driver to still be able to compete for the championship, no matter what the reason.

      Wrecks and injuries happen in racing. It shouldn't result in special provisions being made so that someone can still run for a championship. I know there is a lot of money behind Busch, etc, and that has to be taken into consideration but where is the cutoff? How much money, how "popular" does the driver have to be to get a deal like that? Would they do the same for say, Justin Allgaier?

      If they had a better championship format, they wouldn't need to do this.

      I think the championship should be based upon winning races. From the start of the season, if you win a race, you get to race for the championship. Keep adding winners to the list until mathematically you have to start eliminating people from the list to whittle it down to a champion.

      So if you have 14 different winners, when you get down to 14 races to go, you start the eliminator rounds. Say 4 races, bottom 4 in points who qualified to be championship contenders by virtue of a race win are now out. 10 races to go, do 5 races and kick the bottom 5 out. Last 5 races, 5 race for the championship and how they come out at the end decides the championship.

      Every year the math is a little different but the theory is the same. Reward wins, and forget about points until the end. That would mean it really doesn't matter if you get hurt or sit out a few races due to injury, you still have to win just one race to be in it at the end. And put some stipulation in there that you have to be a legitimate competitor in NASCAR making a good faith effort to race in every event to contend, you can't just show up once in awhile or Start and Park after winning one race.

      I also think that would allow more teams to do more "testing" type stuff during races once you win one, which would allow some other guys a chance to get into the championship that might not if say Kyle Busch is bringing his A game every week.

      I am sure the idea has it's flaws, but the current system is really a joke now that they allowed Busch some special privileges.

      Comment

      • A ron
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2014
        • 294

        #33
        Well I don't really think it's favoritism. Nascar hasn't allowed him any special privileges. The Chase rules have allowed them. It's no different than Denny Hamlin or Tony Stewart. The problem is that it isn't uniform. It's all luck of the draw. If one driver gets injured at Daytona and one gets injured at Richmond, both miss the same number of races, they should both have the same opportunity. The only way to do that is every race counts all year. No Point resetting. If they wanna allow some bad finishes or skipped races for health reasons, take each driver's top 25 or top 30 finishes like a lot of the dirt series do. And yes, Aric Almirola being in the Chase was wrong. It's a flawed system that places more emphasis on luck now than ever. You can be perfect all year and lose to someone who's been mediocre at best all year, the last race by getting taken out by someone who isn't even in the Chase, or one valve spring failure, etc. It may make you a dramatic show but where's the integrity in it?

        Comment

        • t.nie
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2008
          • 1146

          #34
          Originally posted by A ron View Post
          Well I don't really think it's favoritism. Nascar hasn't allowed him any special privileges. The Chase rules have allowed them. It's no different than Denny Hamlin or Tony Stewart. The problem is that it isn't uniform. It's all luck of the draw. If one driver gets injured at Daytona and one gets injured at Richmond, both miss the same number of races, they should both have the same opportunity. The only way to do that is every race counts all year. No Point resetting. If they wanna allow some bad finishes or skipped races for health reasons, take each driver's top 25 or top 30 finishes like a lot of the dirt series do. And yes, Aric Almirola being in the Chase was wrong. It's a flawed system that places more emphasis on luck now than ever. You can be perfect all year and lose to someone who's been mediocre at best all year, the last race by getting taken out by someone who isn't even in the Chase, or one valve spring failure, etc. It may make you a dramatic show but where's the integrity in it?
          I get it. A season championship should not be decided by what occurs in one race, it should be the entire season accumulation of points. But they structured this like the stick and ball sports, there is a regular season championship decided by points (kind of like the conference championships or division championships in other sports), then they go into the Chase/post season playoff to decide who will get the ultimate crown.

          And if you think about it, come Super Bowl time, if Tom Brady gets his knee wiped out on the first play and is out, that is similar to getting wrecked on the opening lap of the last championship race under this format. There is some difference because a backup QB might still be able to win it, but that's the difference between the stick and ball team sports and racing. Racing is one guy behind the wheel with a supporting cast (who can also screw up and cost you the title) and football is 11 players at once, but still if you lose your star at a key position, its probably game over.

          What is kind of interesting is NASCAR is trying to be like these other sports but none of these other sports are trying to be like Nascar. I mean, can you imagine if the NFL determined its champion by total points scored in a season? But its a different sport, there is offense and defense in these other sports, whereas in racing there is really only being as fast as you can be over a race distance.

          I guess that's why this Chase thing seems really contrived for ratings, not so much for racing purists.

          I guess I can see the point that "the rules" are what allows for a waiver, but anytime I see the word waiver I kind of see that as a special provision being made for someone, because its basically saying the rules that everyone else has to abide by aren't going to apply to you in this instance. And ultimately that is granted by Nascar, as they are made the decision to waive the rule on being in every event due to his injury.

          I think the point was that NASCAR thought fans wanted to see guys race "head to head, winner take all" for the crown, and I am like well, isn't that what they were doing every weekend anyway?
          Last edited by t.nie; 07-29-2015, 10:36 AM.

          Comment

          • mudslinger47
            Banned
            • May 2007
            • 3452

            #35
            I really don't get caught up in the chase, its the racing that I enjoy and its as good as ever..... how or who is the champ makes little difference to me...sure its a feather in the cap of the guy that wins it, but other then getting to say my guy won the championship, nothing,,,,its about the racing... I have been to dirt tracks that line up weird... so what, its about the racing..... heck years ago we used to line up by money won, the more you won the further back you started...... once again, its about the racing, ya'll get all caught up in the politics and miss the enjoyment....

            Comment

            • A ron
              Senior Member
              • Apr 2014
              • 294

              #36
              I agree. My thing is Tom Brady's knee can't get blown out in the Super Bowl by a team who isn't playing in the Super Bowl. Playoffs aren't for racing. You can't have teams that aren't playing influencing the outcome. For instance: take the last 3 race segment last year. Jeff Gordon finished 1 position ahead of Newman in race 1. Jeff Gordon finished 1 position behind Newman at Texas (with a bunch of NON Chase people in between), and Gordon finishes higher then Newman at Phoenix with several Chase drivers between them, but Newman goes to the next round because the drivers not even in the Chase affect how the points are awarded.

              Comment

              • A ron
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2014
                • 294

                #37
                The problem to me is that it's messed up the racing. Look at Homestead last year. Everybody basically pitted because they were scared of messing up the top 4.

                Comment

                • Kwaz-13
                  Member
                  • Aug 2010
                  • 34

                  #38
                  I think it's still too early to worry about this. Kyle is on a hot streak. If you run is average points per race of 32.6 for the full 20 complete races, he would have 652 putting him only 6th place overall. His team needs to work on consistency to have a chance at the championship. He's got 2 DNFs in 7 races vs Harvick, Logano, Johnson who all have 0 DNFs in 20 starts.

                  Comment

                  • mudslinger47
                    Banned
                    • May 2007
                    • 3452

                    #39
                    Originally posted by A ron View Post
                    The problem to me is that it's messed up the racing. Look at Homestead last year. Everybody basically pitted because they were scared of messing up the top 4.
                    Again, your looking at the politics of the racing...their rules are set, why worry about them, watch the race for what it is...racing.... I argue the point with CIRF and T.nie cause they, like me like to argue..... to me its fun and a dam site better then whats on tv most of the time...

                    Comment

                    • racin6mod
                      Senior Member
                      • Feb 2008
                      • 2172

                      #40
                      couple points: nascar and Daytona raceway are owned by the Frances they we're the ones that didn't protect the drivers with safe wall everywhere. I don't think a driver/team has to race every event to still win the champion ship in any form of motorsport as long as they are good enough to win races and run good when they show up. just look at the nhra and all the dirt series across the country.

                      Comment

                      • mudslinger47
                        Banned
                        • May 2007
                        • 3452

                        #41
                        Originally posted by racin6mod View Post
                        couple points: nascar and Daytona raceway are owned by the Frances they we're the ones that didn't protect the drivers with safe wall everywhere. I don't think a driver/team has to race every event to still win the champion ship in any form of motorsport as long as they are good enough to win races and run good when they show up. just look at the nhra and all the dirt series across the country.
                        You know, you make a good point, our DLM driver won three championships in one year, all in the DLM and I know for a fact that he didn't make all the shows in one division...

                        Comment

                        • A ron
                          Senior Member
                          • Apr 2014
                          • 294

                          #42
                          I have no problem with him missing shows. It's just the fact that it matters which shows he misses. I agree It should be like the dirt circuits. What shows your driver didn't make it to, didn't matter. Heck, I just like debating on here too. They will change the rules again by next year anyway. Just hate to see something I used to love turn into such a laughing stock. Until 6-7 years ago I didn't miss a lap. I planned everything around Sundays. Now, I turn it over to the race if there's nothing better to do.

                          Comment

                          • mudslinger47
                            Banned
                            • May 2007
                            • 3452

                            #43
                            Originally posted by A ron View Post
                            I have no problem with him missing shows. It's just the fact that it matters which shows he misses. I agree It should be like the dirt circuits. What shows your driver didn't make it to, didn't matter. Heck, I just like debating on here too. They will change the rules again by next year anyway. Just hate to see something I used to love turn into such a laughing stock. Until 6-7 years ago I didn't miss a lap. I planned everything around Sundays. Now, I turn it over to the race if there's nothing better to do.

                            Hello DVR..... record it and watch it when I'm ready.... Usually about nine in the evening... rarely takes more then an hour and a half or so maybe two hours if its really good....

                            Comment

                            • t.nie
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2008
                              • 1146

                              #44
                              Originally posted by A ron View Post
                              The problem to me is that it's messed up the racing. Look at Homestead last year. Everybody basically pitted because they were scared of messing up the top 4.
                              I really don't see how it is any different than it was under the old system. When it came to the end of the year, a whole lot of guys were cruising around in circles trying to not get in the way of anyone still racing for the title, because the nature of any scoring system in racing for a season long championship means that by the end of the year, only a couple will still have a shot at being number one. Most of the field when it comes down to the last few races are just racing for 3 or 4th on back anyway, regardless of how they format it.

                              Now, about those Oakleys.....
                              Last edited by t.nie; 07-30-2015, 01:31 AM.

                              Comment

                              • mudslinger47
                                Banned
                                • May 2007
                                • 3452

                                #45
                                Originally posted by t.nie View Post
                                I really don't see how it is any different than it was under the old system. When it came to the end of the year, a whole lot of guys were cruising around in circles trying to not get in the way of anyone still racing for the title, because the nature of any scoring system in racing for a season long championship means that by the end of the year, only a couple will still have a shot at being number one. Most of the field when it comes down to the last few races are just racing for 3 or 4th on back anyway, regardless of how they format it.

                                Now, about those Oakleys.....
                                Agreement in that...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X