Registering for Confiscation

[25drtrkr]

Yep a great Democrat in fact. Nothing and I mean nothing, whether it be the truth or heavy evidence of wrong doing against any Democrat matters.

I ask ask how a real Christian could live like that!!! Condoning a corrupt and dishonest political party and all of the lies and corruption that they perpetrate!!!

While at the same time joining in on their actions, to the word.

Good post, I was thinking the same! I would be very nervous about my eternity, with the answers he gives.

btw....if a criminal gets off on a technicality, isn't he still a criminal! Oh, wait, he wasn't convicted of it! Go figure!

[CIRF]

I am not debating whether or not he is a rapist. What I am saying is until someone is tried and convicted, some lady on a TV show challenging him to sue him doesn't equate an actual criminal trial and conviction.

I don't condone all the things he did. Far from it. But taking his womanizing and philandering and then going to extremes with this rape stuff is really pushing the envelope. It is based on your own hate and malice, not on any facts.

So with that, you believe what you want. I believe we will just disagree.

You're absolutely correct, a challenge of a law suit proves nothing in regards to guilt or innocence of Clinton and his enabler wife of rape. What it does prove is that clinton and his enabler wife really didn't want to get into a position where facts and sworn testimony would be aired in open court. A place that our rapist president and his enabler really didn't want to go.

However, to blindly dismiss any culpability that Clinton and his enabler wife are capable of such an act of degradation and violence can only be induced by ideology, naivete', gullibility, denial or to put it nicely, shortsightedness which is a much more civil term than sheer stupidity. In addition, if one is to blindly conclude that this rape didn't happen then one must deem the word and accounts of Ms. Broaddrick to be conjured up bold faced lies and that clinton is/was morally incapable of such an act or lying repeatedly to cover it up.

Ms. Broaddrick made no book deal nor did she and her family seek any kind of financial gain as a result of her revelation and Clinton couldn't run for any office again even if her intent was to damage him politically. So what was there to be gained by Ms. Broaddrick for lying about the whole incident, whether it be tangible or intangible? It appears to be nothing.

And, you are also absolutely correct, I do hate rapists. Everyone I know does but you seem to be the exception, at least in reference to Clinton.

[buster83]

juanitad$ck liked it so much she joined the campaign and hillary just kept thanking her for taking care of bill.

[CIRF]

Another one in denial! LOL!

[SuperEight]

https://www.youtube.com/embed/03XEUPfD0qM

Ordered my H&K VP40-LE today and my wife got a SIG P290RS 380ACP, from Bud's Gun Shop.

http://www.budsgunshop.com/catalog/index.php

[mudslinger47]

Why do Democrats stand up so fervently for Bill Clinton ... he's a piece of garbage.... anyone that doesn't think hes guilty for about everything he's been public challenged with is nuts.... way to many coincidences' around these two... and now we have right at 1000 secret and top secret Emails and not a mention about them, not a word... If this was The Donald you think anyone in the media would have mentioned it?