SCOTUS justice Scalia dead.

[ss12]

no we are upset wth Obama period , he need to be impeached and thrown in jail

Your "we" is a very small group and is getting smaller every year.

[kidrock]

no we are upset wth Obama period , he need to be impeached and thrown in jail

Lite-inn, you guys always bring up impeachment but, the reality is you don't have nothing to impeach him on they would have already done so.

[Clayton_Wetter]

Funny how Mitch said he's not going to be voting in a new judge in Obamas last year in office but,had no problem voting for judge Kennedy in Reagans last year in office. Again nothing but a bunch of hypocrites.

Once again you show blind partisan views. For your info the Democrats had the Senate Majority the last 6 years of Reagan's terms. Voting for someone while in a minority was just a pointless gesture.

But you sure showed us who the hypocrites are. haha Really????

[skids]

Bs the repubs are no better just a bunch of hypocrites pure and simple. They prove it over and over again. Cruz was born in another country but yet he's legal to run forpresident. Then you guys say Obama was born in Kenya yet he is not legal hypocrites
It doesn't matter who the President nominates it's his right you know his constitutional right.
So what your saying is the Dems did the right thing when they confirmed Reagans nominee but, yet the repubs are saying they won't confirm Obamas so, really the Dems are worse then the repubs.

Kid, what you fail to point out is that the vacancy that Kennedy eventually filled started in June of 1987 (almost a year and a half before the end of Reagan's term). Scalia's vacancy leaves far less than a year to the end of Obama's term) Sooooo actually the dems you want to paint as so reasonable took longer to fill the vacancy than the republicans are talking about taking now.

Would you feel better if they let Obama put up two nominees only to be rejected like the Dems. did in 1987??? The end result is the same.

[ss12]

I hope the senate doesn't approve Obama's nominee so Bernie can nominate his when he wins.

[kidrock]

Kid, what you fail to point out is that the vacancy that Kennedy eventually filled started in June of 1987 (almost a year and a half before the end of Reagan's term). Scalia's vacancy leaves far less than a year to the end of Obama's term) Sooooo actually the dems you want to paint as so reasonable took longer to fill the vacancy than the republicans are talking about taking now.

Would you feel better if they let Obama put up two nominees only to be rejected like the Dems. did in 1987??? The end result is the same.

Ok so what a year or year and half not that much of a difference. You guys have controlled the Supreme Court for how long. And your just worried it's going to go in favor of the liberals for a change

Keenedy was confirmed in Febuary 1988 the last year of Reagans term

At least they will doing their job. So yes I hope Obama does nominate someone and then let's see what they do. That's how the constitution was set up. You guy don't get to cherry pick the constitution.

I like how some are saying we haven't confirmed a Supreme Court Justice in 80 years of a election year but, their not saying the last 200 plus years so, it sounds like it's been done before

http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2...alia.html?_r=0


Both side are just a bunch of hypocrites and that's what's wrong with out politics.

[ss12]

Watch both videos. See what Sen. Grassley(R)has to say.

http://crooksandliars.com/2016/02/st...uestion-scotus

[kidrock]

Watch both videos. See what Sen. Grassley(R)has to say.

http://crooksandliars.com/2016/02/st...uestion-scotus

President Reagan said it best. Now what you say. They keep saying 80 years, was it really 80 years ago Reagan was president. Hypocrites

[TS FAN]

Dems are bunch of liars who change rules when they have power, and change them back when they are not in power. I love the statement most Americas are upset with Reps for always blocking Obama. How about this, most Americans are upset because the voted in REPS are failing to stop Obama? Try that one out. The majority of this Country is not behind Obama. That is why you are seeing the uprising in the voting.

[TS FAN]

BTW do not accuse me of saying Obama was born outside the USA. I never said it. But apparently the ignorant on here are now going to accuse Cruz of not being a legit candidate. Pot meet Kettle. Good heavens!!!!!!

[dirtMAN007]

Your "we" is a very small group and is getting smaller every year.

HOW WRONG

YOU ARE !!!!! HIS APPROVAL RATING IS VERY LOW !!!!!!!! THRE "WE" GROWS STRONGER EVERY DAy !!!!!!

[Clayton_Wetter]

So I take it that to the conservatives the Constitution where it says The President "SHALL" nominate judges no longer matters when it is ignored to benefit the GOP and conservatives. Seems that you hold it in high standards when you can claim a Democrat is not going by the letter of the Constitution yet oh so willing to use it to wipe your collective backsides when it gets in the way of what you believe. ........... And you claim the Democrats are Hypocrites ? Hypocrite: someone who says they have particular moral beliefs but behaves in way that shows these are not sincere

You should be careful and educated on what you wish for. Liberalism will take this country into something we will all suffer in. Wishing for liberal Judges that will destroy the Constitution is insane. Democrats are the epitome of the words hypocrite, liars, and immorality. I just don't understand why people flock to these people without question. It's your future and your children's future at stake.

If you want a partisan judge without the people even having a say, then I guess you are far to gone as many people have become in the way the nation was founded.

[Clayton_Wetter]

I hope the senate doesn't approve Obama's nominee so Bernie can nominate his when he wins.

Yes we need Loretta Lynch in there to victimize this nation with corrupt partisan injustice. By the way Bernie is not going to win squat.

[Clayton_Wetter]

Bs the repubs are no better just a bunch of hypocrites pure and simple. They prove it over and over again. Cruz was born in another country but yet he's legal to run forpresident. Then you guys say Obama was born in Kenya yet he is not legal hypocrites
It doesn't matter who the President nominates it's his right you know his constitutional right.
So what your saying is the Dems did the right thing when they confirmed Reagans nominee but, yet the repubs are saying they won't confirm Obamas so, really the Dems are worse then the repubs.

Of course they are no worse to you. But in the real world it is a fact that the Democrat parties goal is to destroy the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. That can not be said about the Republican party.

To go through life believing lies and ignoring the truth will have to be answered for in the end.

[Clayton_Wetter]

Your "we" is a very small group and is getting smaller every year.

If anything it is much bigger than you know. But the people's voice has not been listened to for seven years.


BREAKING: RNC Weighing Obama Impeachment
Keith Farrell January 6, 2016 2016 Presidential Race, Abuse of Authority, Headline News

Members of the Republican National Committee will consider a resolution that would urge House Republicans to begin impeachment proceedings for president Obama.

Michigan’s RNC committeeman Dave Agema will introduce the resolution at the RNC’s next meetings which will take place from January 13th-15th.

“It’s simply asking our House of Representatives…to abide by their oath of office and accomplish what they should do,” Agema said.

The resolution details 48 criminal charges, including executive actions on guns and immigration, Syrian refugees, and spying on congress.

“The way it works is one House of Representatives member puts in impeachment articles for the House and it starts the process,” Agema said. “Recently, we didn’t own the House and the Senate, but Republicans do now, and the purpose of it really is we’re a nation of laws and separation of powers.”

If the House introduce articles of impeachment, they would go to the Judiciary Committee, where 20 votes would be needed for the proceedings to continue– there are 23 Republicans on that committee. It would require 218 votes to pass the House, where there are 246 Republicans. Ultimately, the Senate would decide the president’s fate, with two-thirds needed to remove him from office.

The articles, which were written by the North American Law Center, also list Vice President Joe Biden and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as co-conspirators.

“It lets the president, Obama, know that we’re not going to put up with his ability to go around the Constitution. Secondly, it warns any future president that he doesn’t have that right either, and it encourages the base to get involved,” Agema concluded.

The North American Law Center made a Facebook post dispelling some of the most common critiques of impeachment:

We don’t have the votes to impeach! – Why not, since we only need 20 of 23 Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee to advance Articles to the full House, only 218 of 247 House Republicans to Impeach in the House… no democrats needed until the Senate trial.
The Senate won’t convict! – We need 2/3 of the senators “present” at the end of the trial in order to convict and remove. The Senate is NOT a “legislative” body under legislative rules in the case of impeachment. They are a “criminal jury” operating under very strict Rules similar to any criminal jury. NO “co-conspirator” can sit on the jury…. How many Senators will be “present” at the end of the trial?
We will get Joe Biden! – No… because Joe Biden was directly involved in every Obama crime, he is ineligible to succeed Obama to the Oval Office. Evidence presented in the Obama trial will demonstrate Biden’s complicity, as well and that of Hillary Clinton.
What about the Court of Public Opinion? – An impeachment trial must be aired on open TV for the nation and world to see. The court of public opinion is more important that the Senate Jury, who will be swayed by the Court of Public Opinion.
Big donors don’t matter, compared to the voters! – No matter how many millions a handful of GOP donors pour into the 2016 election — it will not result in votes in the election booth. Republicans must regain the faith of their voters, which they cannot do at this point without impeachment of President Obama!


Read more: http://thelibertarianrepublic.com/br...#ixzz40MdY154V
Follow us: @TheLibRepublic on Twitter