A must read: Agenda 30

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Clayton_Wetter
    Banned
    • May 2007
    • 16671

    #1

    A must read: Agenda 30

    Guest commentary: United Nations Agenda 2030 primer

    Posted by Ann Corcoran on December 4, 2015

    Editor: Late last month, here, we mentioned that the United Nations-driven Agenda 2030 now involves the use of ‘refugees’ migrating around the world as an important tool for The Agenda.

    A reader, Sharon Shaw, from Kentucky has been following the issue closely and has offered to provide us with a series of informational pieces to help bring us all up to speed on the larger agenda designed to destroy individual freedom, and diminish American sovereignty and power as decisions for our future would be made at an international level.

    This is not in the realm of conspiracy theories, they are right up front about it. So, maybe if we have that understanding from the beginning we won’t waste a lot of time asking, is it happening, why is it happening and just get to work defeating them!

    Obama at 2030
    On September 27, 2015, Obama presented remarks at the UN Agenda 2030 closing session. His drive to pour third world refugees into your towns and cities is a major objective of this agenda and so, as we have reported, he is pretty darn angry at any of you trying to impede the directives he has been given from on high. See his speech here: https://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-an...elopment-goals
    Agenda 2030 is Agenda 21 on steroids, she says!

    Here is Sharon ….

    Agenda 2030: Interpreting the components

    You will likely be hearing more about the UN’s Agenda 2030 in the upcoming months. What is it? It is the UN’s Agenda 21 on steroids. Agenda 21 was presented to 178 world leaders at the UN Earth Summit in 1992. The US was among the participants and the President, George H.W. Bush and his administration began adopting parts of the agenda into American laws and lives.

    President Clinton, in 1993, signed Executive Order 12852 to create the President’s Council on Sustainable Development in order to “harmonize” US environmental policy with UN directives as outlined in Agenda 21.

    Fast forward to September 2015: The UN holds another world summit with hundreds of world leaders “Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” It is basically Agenda 21 revised, but its intentions are much more far-reaching to change the planet according to UN guidance. Posing as an altruistic plan for the good of all mankind, this plan is designed to rob individuals of freedoms through its mandates and to take individual countries’ sovereignties away.

    What does all this have to do with refugee resettlement? The two go hand-in-hand, literally one supporting the other so to speak. The main goal, as stated by the UN, is sustainable development. Although there are 17 goals included in Agenda 2030,

    What is sustainable development? According to its authors, the objective of sustainable development is to “integrate economic, social and environmental policies in order to achieve reduced consumption, social equity, and the preservation and restoration of biodiversity.” Authors of Agenda 2030 insist that every societal decision be based on environmental impact, focusing on three components; global land use, global education, and global population control and reduction.

    In the Agenda 2030 document, under the heading “The New Agenda”, para. 29:

    “We recognize the positive contribution of migrants for inclusive growth and sustainable development. We also recognize that international migration is a multi-dimensional reality of major relevance for the development of countries of origin, transit and destination, which requires coherent and comprehensive responses. We will cooperate internationally to ensure safe, orderly and regular migration involving full respect for human rights and the humane treatment of migrants regardless of migration status, of refugees and of displaced persons. Such cooperation should also strengthen the resilience of communities hosting refugees, particularly in developing countries. We underline the right of migrants to return to their country of citizenship, and recall that States must ensure that their returning nationals are duly received.”

    This statement boldly defines the “open borders” policies adopted by the European Union, policies which, as currently evidenced, have failed miserably. At its core, Agenda 2030 is a methodology utilizing refugee resettlement as a tool for this “new universal Agenda” (quote from Agenda 2030 preamble).

    Stay tuned for our next article exploring Agenda 2030 as we delve into its components and what it means for our country, and, indeed, all nations.

  • ss12
    Senior Member
    • May 2007
    • 3730

    #2
    Clayton what is your take on the council on foreign relations?
    Haters don't really hate you, in fact they hate themselves because you are a reflection of what they wish to be.

    Comment

    • Clayton_Wetter
      Banned
      • May 2007
      • 16671

      #3
      Originally posted by ss12 View Post
      Clayton what is your take on the council on foreign relations?
      I wish it didn't exist.

      Comment

      • ss12
        Senior Member
        • May 2007
        • 3730

        #4
        Clayton have you ever heard of council of foreign relations " building North America community"? Rafael Cruz's wife is a Task Force Member.





        Do you still think he is not an establishment candidate?
        Haters don't really hate you, in fact they hate themselves because you are a reflection of what they wish to be.

        Comment

        • old fan
          Banned
          • Jan 2016
          • 4191

          #5
          hey clayton look here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_Axworthy

          Comment

          • AnonymousNate
            Banned
            • Oct 2014
            • 571

            #6
            Originally posted by ss12 View Post
            Clayton have you ever heard of council of foreign relations " building North America community"? Rafael Cruz's wife is a Task Force Member. http://www.cfr.org/canada/building-n...ommunity/p8102 http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/04...merican-union/ Do you still think he is not an establishment candidate?
            What is the North America Union Act. Alex... Peace and Security from Canada to Chili...

            Comment

            • AnonymousNate
              Banned
              • Oct 2014
              • 571

              #7
              Originally posted by Clayton_Wetter View Post
              I wish it didn't exist.
              Round table groups steering this ''country'' and world into chaos and destruction....

              Comment

              • Clayton_Wetter
                Banned
                • May 2007
                • 16671

                #8
                I don't think, I know that he is not. Once again your source is fraudulent. See the list below.

                A few of these web sites may be run by truly insane people who actually believe what they publish, but if so that is a small minority. One of the proofs of this is how obviously fake the articles are. Old and heavily debunked articles from several years age are routinely updated with new dates and names and republished as new stories. Some site owners may believe that they are trying to shift public opinion by convincing the public to believe outrageous lies. Followers of this Overton Window theory believe that by making wildly unbelievable and bombastic claims, their slightly less unbelievable claims will feel more acceptable to readers. While this certainly may be true, that does not make it a morally acceptable strategy for discussing public policy. Other site owners may feel that they are simply “talking to their base” and that this relieves them of any moral duty to tell the truth. This is a reflection of the sad state of moral thinking in our society today. A few sites claim to be “humor” or “satire” sites and exist mainly to provide links which people can use to fool unsuspecting victims on social media. These sites will sometimes post a disclaimer in the site footer, but often these disclaimers will disappear and reappear over time. A small number of sites on our list are simply government-funded propaganda sites which post ridiculous claims from tyrannical governments which want to improve their public image or attack the public images of their opponents.
                The sites on the list below are a mix of all of these types of sites. Strict categorization is not simple as many of these sites exist in multiple categories or switch between categories based upon whatever proves to be most profitable at the current time.

                Web Sites Which Publish Fake News and Other Hoaxes


                21StCenturyWire.com
                ActivistPost.com
                Alternet.org
                AmericanNews.com
                AntiWar.com
                BeforeItsNews.com
                BigPZone.com
                Chronicle.su
                ConsciousLifeNews.com
                ConspiracyWire.com
                CountdownToZeroTime.com
                CounterPsyOps.com
                DailyBuzzLive.com
                DailyCurrant.com
                DCClothesLine.com
                Disclose.tv
                DuffelBlog.com
                DuhProgressive.com
                EliteReaders.com
                EmpireNews.net
                English.ruvr.ru
                EUTimes.net
                FederalistPress.com
                FromTheTrenchesWorldReport.com
                GeoEngineeringWatch.org
                GlobalResearch.ca
                GonzoGlobe.com
                GovtSlaves.info
                GuardianLV.com
                GulagBound.com
                HangTheBankers.com
                HealthImpactNews.com
                HumansAreFree.com
                Huzlers.com
                IntelliHub.com
                LewRockwell.com
                LiveFreeLiveNatural.com
                NationalReport.net
                NaturalCuresNotMedicine.com
                NaturalNews.com
                Newswire-24.com
                NoDisinfo.com
                NotAllowedTo.com
                Now8News.com
                NowTheEndBegins.com
                PakAlertPress.com
                PoliticalBlindSpot.com
                PressTV.ir
                RandPaulReview.com
                RawForBeauty.com
                RealFarmacy.com
                RedFlagNews.com
                ResponsibleTechnology.org
                RT.com
                SecretsOfTheFed.com
                SouthWeb.org
                TheCommonSenseShow.com
                TheControversialFiles.net
                TheDailySheeple.com
                TheFreeThoughtProject
                TheLastGreatStand.com
                TheNewAmerican.com
                TheRacketReport.com
                TheRunDownLive.com
                TopInfoPost.com
                TruthAndAction.org
                TruthBroadcastNetwork.com
                TurnerRadioNetwork.com
                UndergroundHealth.com
                USAHitman.com
                VeteransToday.com
                WhyDontYouTryThis.com
                WorldTruth.tv
                YourNewsWire.com

                Each of these sites may, at times, publish legitimate news articles. This is a useful technique for making the illegitimate articles harder to spot. The fact that a home burglar doesn’t rob houses three nights a week does not make him any less of a home burglar. The fact that some of these sites occasionally posts a legitimate article does not make the publication itself legitimate. Any news site will occasionally publish a poorly-researched article. To earn a spot on this list, the publication must show a clear disregard for the objective truth. We all know how terribly mainstream media outlets like ABC, CBS, NBC, and CNN fail to promote legitimate news stories. The promise of alternative media is that we can do better than traditional centralized mass-media. The publishers listed above are purposefully failing to do better. They are actually doing a worse job than the mainstream media — something many of us once thought impossible.

                Comment

                • Clayton_Wetter
                  Banned
                  • May 2007
                  • 16671

                  #9
                  dcclothsline.com is on the hoax and fraud list. ss, please read all of my post above.

                  Comment

                  • ss12
                    Senior Member
                    • May 2007
                    • 3730

                    #10
                    So the CRF post is not factual? You just can't handle the facts. Cruz is a establishment candidate. Here is a video that even Cruz admit his wife was a member of CFR. Nothing more factual than Rafael admitting it.

                    Tired of being told one thing and watching a series of what Ted calls actions and the fruit of ones works as another? I sure am. Most people know when they are being gaslighted, yet many don’t. Gas…
                    Haters don't really hate you, in fact they hate themselves because you are a reflection of what they wish to be.

                    Comment

                    • Clayton_Wetter
                      Banned
                      • May 2007
                      • 16671

                      #11
                      Originally posted by AnonymousNate View Post
                      Round table groups steering this ''country'' and world into chaos and destruction....
                      Post #8 was meant for ss, not you Nate.

                      You are right.

                      Comment

                      • Clayton_Wetter
                        Banned
                        • May 2007
                        • 16671

                        #12


                        Her is a CFR membership list. 4700 members. Just because you are a member does not mean that these people are all like minded. They are not, but you want to condemn Cruz wife for once being a member. She actually did not agree with the CFR in principles. Actually you want to condemn Ted Cruz himself. Hypocritically I'm sure that you could look at the members and find many people that YOU do support.
                        Last edited by Clayton_Wetter; 03-13-2016, 08:27 PM.

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X