I would expect more funny, easily-circumvented rules to come from this. Especially if you believe in the weight advantage and have tens of thousands to burn.
Lucas rules
Collapse
X
-
-
There wont be much rule change. That was only to get control of the #6 car. There will be another rule change when the NEW SHERRIFF gets a hold of the #0 car.THE REAL SLIDING SIDEWAYS!
Comment
-
Don't be so sure. Lr unsprung weight is the new boogyman like traction control was 15 years ago.Originally posted by SLIDING SIDEWAYS View PostThere wont be much rule change. That was only to get control of the #6 car. There will be another rule change when the NEW SHERRIFF gets a hold of the #0 car.Modern Day Spec Wedge Racing
Comment
-
-
Why do they keep insisting on chasing the Boogey-man? He doesn't exist and the rule book is getting fat & stupid while they grope around in the dark trying to grab him... "MARCO!"Originally posted by MasterSbilt_Racer View PostDon't be so sure. Lr unsprung weight is the new boogyman like traction control was 15 years ago.Politically Incorrect.
Comment
-
The boogie man checks for chuck Norris under his bed before going to sleep every night.....just sayin.Originally posted by Stede Bonnet View PostWhy do they keep insisting on chasing the Boogey-man? He doesn't exist and the rule book is getting fat & stupid while they grope around in the dark trying to grab him... "MARCO!"Where is the move over flag when you need it?????
Comment
-
I'm sure someone has but it seems to me it would be a waste of money when you could achieve the same effect with bolt on weight. It'd be a helluva lot easier to move the weight around for different track conditions bolted on instead of forged into an axle tube... Once again, why bother making a rule on this when a cheaper equivalent solution is available? The heavy axles and the wheel spacers I understand better than bothering with an exotic axle tube, because they are easy to swap out for dampening engine torque in the slick.Originally posted by zyoung25 View PostEver think of having a axle tube made of tungsten carbide?Politically Incorrect.
Comment
-
-
Was that before they announced that they had relaxed the SFI Requirements for this season? As I understood it was only needing to be full containment.Originally posted by MittenMadman View PostYes they are. We were told that we might not be legal and have to send it back down to have it SFI rated...
The drivers you are saying don't have $40k cars, are they not SLM? I don't often see All Alumnimum motors selling for under $20k, and a nice roller newer than 2013 is probably going to cost in the area of $20k as well all said and done. I don't think the $40k number is that ridiculous ($100k which is what some of the National guys are spending on the other hand...). I do know that there are a lot of guys running in less than a $40k car too, its not ideal and I think after the changes they made the rules make more sense. I don't think going from no rules one season, to restrictive rules the next is necessarily the best way to do things and I'm glad they changed it.
Thanks,
Jeff.
Comment
-
I think the rule makers need to be drug tested. I'm NOT doing FC, period.Originally posted by racerb12 View PostWhat do u think Lucas oil, drug checking your drivers for safety or bolting a wheel cover on.
@W2 your assertion that if $40K is no biggie every year to an average team, whats another $10K for the new garb is in error. Most local teams don't buy a "New/Used" engine every season or a new/used car, they spent years accumulating and struggle to pay for rebuilds. IMHO, the roof line is too low and the c@ckpit is too confined to safely use FC seats in a DLM, especially for taller and/or larger drivers.
Once the concussions and neck injuries spike they'll make some other bonehead rule too. No thanks.Politically Incorrect.
Comment
-
Who's to say the axle tubes were the only thing made of this stuff? When these parts are made, they're always there. Not in the way, and no worries of them shifting. It makes sense to me.Originally posted by Stede Bonnet View PostI'm sure someone has but it seems to me it would be a waste of money when you could achieve the same effect with bolt on weight. It'd be a helluva lot easier to move the weight around for different track conditions bolted on instead of forged into an axle tube... Once again, why bother making a rule on this when a cheaper equivalent solution is available? The heavy axles and the wheel spacers I understand better than bothering with an exotic axle tube, because they are easy to swap out for dampening engine torque in the slick.
Comment
-
Not sure where the $10k number is coming from.Originally posted by Stede Bonnet View PostI think the rule makers need to be drug tested. I'm NOT doing FC, period.
@W2 your assertion that if $40K is no biggie every year to an average team, whats another $10K for the new garb is in error. Most local teams don't buy a "New/Used" engine every season or a new/used car, they spent years accumulating and struggle to pay for rebuilds. IMHO, the roof line is too low and the c@ckpit is too confined to safely use FC seats in a DLM, especially for taller and/or larger drivers.
Once the concussions and neck injuries spike they'll make some other bonehead rule too. No thanks.
Thanks,
Jeff.
Comment
Comment