Why are crate late models even a thing?

[Stefan2k4]

I agree with this totally.

A better way to do it would be take traction away so that a stock crate engine would be almost too much horsepower.

Therein lies the greatest wisdom spoken here and the solution to all the problems that crate late models are suppose to address but don't. Limit their traction and you won't have worry about what's under the hood.

[fryefan]

If you support Crates, then you are also supporting the end of weekly SLM....or maybe even any LM races at all unless your track can get Lucas, WOO, ect.

Weekly SLM racing has been dieing off for many years. I would much rather have crate late models, than no late models at a weekly show.

[Clayton_Wetter]

Weekly SLM racing has been dieing off for many years. I would much rather have crate late models, than no late models at a weekly show.

Creating the crate class is resulting in LM's dying. Many promoters are hoping to replace LM's with crates to reduce purses.

[kidrock]

Crates are not the reason SLM are dwindling. Those who are in crates are in them because, they no longer could afford to run a SLM or they didn't have the money it takes to run a SLM and this was a alternative to stay in a late model. Now crates are getting out of hand (cost wise) that class will start to dwindle.

[Clayton_Wetter]

Crates are not the reason SLM are dwindling. Those who are in crates are in them because, they no longer could afford to run a SLM or they didn't have the money it takes to run a SLM and this was a alternative to stay in a late model. Now crates are getting out of hand (cost wise) that class will start to dwindle.

Yes it is, giving them a choice has allowed the low budget LM's to leave the class altogether.

Most crate races I've watched show the cars under powered with an exception of one or two for some reason. Go figure.

[kidrock]

Yes it is, giving them a choice has allowed the low budget LM's to leave the class altogether.

Most crate races I've watched show the cars under powered with an exception of one or two for some reason. Go figure.

Most of those low budget teams were leaving anyway because of the cost but, it's just my opinion

[mcarter815]

All the weekly SLM here turned into limited IMCA late models eight years ago. Weekly SLM doesn’t exist here and never will again. Fans don’t want to pay the ticket prices that would be required to pay the purse.

[Snowmanracr21]

My biggest pet peeve with crate late models are the guys who "cant afford" an open motor but show up in a $250,000 hauler with 2 cars.

[fryefan]

Creating the crate class is resulting in LM's dying. Many promoters are hoping to replace LM's with crates to reduce purses.

High engine and shock costs have led to low car counts in the open late model class , not the creation of the crate late model class.

[fryefan]

Crates are not the reason SLM are dwindling. Those who are in crates are in them because, they no longer could afford to run a SLM or they didn't have the money it takes to run a SLM and this was a alternative to stay in a late model. Now crates are getting out of hand (cost wise) that class will start to dwindle.

You hit the nail squarely on the head.

[fryefan]

Most of those low budget teams were leaving anyway because of the cost but, it's just my opinion

And you are correct.

[Bud99]

What the hell's the difference? If you can afford to run a super late model, then run it. If you can afford to run a crate late model, then run it. Racing is expensive. Hell street stocks are expensive to run. Let's face it, the average Joe down the street making 15 dollars an hour, and trying to raise a family just can't do it. My self can't in know way afford to race a super late model so we are going to run a crate late model. But I sure as hell am not going to be crying because I can't afford to run a super. Car counts are hurting in most places I see. That includes street stocks and all the way up. I wish we all made 100 dollars an hour so we all could be racing what we really want to, but that's not how life is. Ok every one pile on and start beating on me!!!

[mcarter815]

My biggest pet peeve with crate late models are the guys who "cant afford" an open motor but show up in a $250,000 hauler with 2 cars.

They usually have 30 year loans on those haulers.

[Matt49]

The notion that the money being saved on the difference between a competitive open motor and a competitive crate motor is simply being spent on "trick" components for crates is COMPLETELY false. We have a very competitive field of crates in southern Indiana and the guys that win regularly do NOT have trick lightweight stuff on their cars. Are there cars out there with all of the lightweight components? Absolutely. But it is FAR from necessary to be competitive or win. I will also add that the ones that appear to have more power are usually the better handling cars that are able to carry more momentum though the corners. If you can keep the motor up in the power band you WILL have more power. You don't have to cheat the motor to do that.
Widespread motor cheating and exotic components in crates are myths created by fans that simply don't like them and want something to blame on the demise of super late models besides the obvious $50,000 elephant in the room. Spread bore motors were the nail in the coffin for weekly SLM racing. Simply buried alive at this point propped up by independent wealth in most cases.

[No_Weak_Links]

If you think about it, crate motors AT THIS POINT IN TIME, may be keeping dirt racing alive. They are keeping the gates open weekly at dirt tracks across the country....without late models (where I live) fans would not attend. Since owners can't afford to run supers every week if it weren't for crate guys the gates would close, therefore no place to run the Lucas and WOO events. You might need to be thankful these guys are paying the bills so the big guys can come twice a year instead of bashing them.