Greg Satterlee appeal????

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • bleedblue55
    Senior Member
    • Feb 2012
    • 1876

    #1

    Greg Satterlee appeal????

    Well we finally got out of the pits at Wytheville! Wow that was crazy. On to Concord for our WRG tire appeal 👊🏻 #notgoingdownacheater. This was posted on his twitter on Sunday. I thought the appeal process had already played out. Has his appeal not been heard? Can you appeal the appeal process? Just wondering.
  • chupp n bloomer fan
    Senior Member
    • May 2007
    • 11526

    #2
    Appealing the appeal, think they all are.
    Up in the air who my next “favorite” driver is. Really losing hope on Bloomer getting anywhere back to “normal”.

    Comment

    • *Bandit*
      Senior Member
      • Jul 2007
      • 3026

      #3
      This is the very last appeal they can use, it was stated on other threads.
      A member from back in the day....


      Comment

      • J20in1st
        Senior Member
        • Jul 2009
        • 1317

        #4
        Is the appeal still with the wrg? Why would the wrg over turn it?

        Comment

        • Barbecueboy
          Senior Member
          • Mar 2013
          • 18116

          #5
          Originally posted by J20in1st View Post
          Is the appeal still with the wrg? Why would the wrg over turn it?
          I agree........if they are so certain........why even entertain the appeal......and for a second time even?
          Where is the move over flag when you need it?????

          Comment

          • buster83
            Senior Member
            • Jun 2007
            • 1878

            #6
            not all tires failed the drug test some were just scuffed in the wrong place

            Comment

            • J20in1st
              Senior Member
              • Jul 2009
              • 1317

              #7
              My point is, the system is not going to go against themselves. It needs to go to a neutral spot for appealz

              Comment

              • blncfn57
                Senior Member
                • May 2007
                • 2013

                #8
                Originally posted by buster83 View Post
                not all tires failed the drug test some were just scuffed in the wrong place
                They surely didn't need to fail a lab test to see that a tire was defaced. Where did you hear that at? These 5 failed lab tests from samples taken from the tire.

                Comment

                • Barbecueboy
                  Senior Member
                  • Mar 2013
                  • 18116

                  #9
                  It's been posted numerous times about the scuffing........but who knows......I haven't seen the results as to what didn't match where, you?

                  I read somewhere that somebody also said all 5 tires were missing something too.........and that wasn't true either.
                  Where is the move over flag when you need it?????

                  Comment

                  • blncfn57
                    Senior Member
                    • May 2007
                    • 2013

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Barbecueboy View Post
                    It's been posted numerous times about the scuffing........but who knows......I haven't seen the results as to what didn't match where, you?

                    I read somewhere that somebody also said all 5 tires were missing something too.........and that wasn't true either.
                    If you want to be bonehead enough to think UMP needs a lab to declare a defaced tire illegal, you may want to rethink your theory. I've had UMP tell me I had to replace a tire because some of the writing on the tire had been rubbed off (from contact with another car) They didn't need a lab to enforce it.

                    Comment

                    • Tireguy17
                      Senior Member
                      • Mar 2008
                      • 1173

                      #11
                      Scott is quoted in a DoD article and victory lane video interviews that the tire test results showed something was MISSING from the tire, not ADDED. I think that is the biggest argument of the appeal process, how does 1 remove a chemical from the tire....I don't pretend to be a chemical engineer.

                      Comment

                      • blncfn57
                        Senior Member
                        • May 2007
                        • 2013

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Tireguy17 View Post
                        Scott is quoted in a DoD article and victory lane video interviews that the tire test results showed something was MISSING from the tire, not ADDED. I think that is the biggest argument of the appeal process, how does 1 remove a chemical from the tire....I don't pretend to be a chemical engineer.
                        chemistry. some chemicals when put together with neutralize eachother, then they're both gone. It's a big game and now being advertised as "undetectable".

                        Comment

                        • fastford
                          Senior Member
                          • Dec 2008
                          • 4059

                          #13
                          what chemical would hoosier put in a tire to make it perform less than its potential ? i do not under stand this theory....

                          Comment

                          • Barbecueboy
                            Senior Member
                            • Mar 2013
                            • 18116

                            #14
                            Originally posted by blncfn57 View Post
                            If you want to be bonehead enough to think UMP needs a lab to declare a defaced tire illegal, you may want to rethink your theory. I've had UMP tell me I had to replace a tire because some of the writing on the tire had been rubbed off (from contact with another car) They didn't need a lab to enforce it.
                            I never once said I believed that at all............anywhere.

                            I do believe however , in your pitiful attempt to do nothing but discredit everything BBQ you are forgetting what you and others have said on the subject.

                            I.e........all 5 tires were missing something, don't believe all 5 were......the scuffing allegation that has been mentioned multiple times and you act like its some new revelation.......etc.
                            maybe we can get a look at the results to see what exactly was wrong with each tire to clear it up........surely they put that out there somewhere, right?

                            So do me a favor........( and I'm totally good with the dialogue)but if you are going to hang on my a$$, try to keep up and try to get it right.
                            Where is the move over flag when you need it?????

                            Comment

                            • Barbecueboy
                              Senior Member
                              • Mar 2013
                              • 18116

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Tireguy17 View Post
                              Scott is quoted in a DoD article and victory lane video interviews that the tire test results showed something was MISSING from the tire, not ADDED. I think that is the biggest argument of the appeal process, how does 1 remove a chemical from the tire....I don't pretend to be a chemical engineer.
                              So it was only Scott that said that???........one of the 4m justice league experts said it was all 5 of them.

                              Ironically, I think that same guy is a chemical engineer.......he's up to speed on all of the processes and speaks with authority on them.
                              Where is the move over flag when you need it?????

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X