Well we finally got out of the pits at Wytheville! Wow that was crazy. On to Concord for our WRG tire appeal 👊🏻 #notgoingdownacheater. This was posted on his twitter on Sunday. I thought the appeal process had already played out. Has his appeal not been heard? Can you appeal the appeal process? Just wondering.
Greg Satterlee appeal????
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
Appealing the appeal, think they all are.Up in the air who my next “favorite†driver is. Really losing hope on Bloomer getting anywhere back to “normalâ€.
-
-
-
It's been posted numerous times about the scuffing........but who knows......I haven't seen the results as to what didn't match where, you?
I read somewhere that somebody also said all 5 tires were missing something too.........and that wasn't true either.Where is the move over flag when you need it?????
Comment
-
If you want to be bonehead enough to think UMP needs a lab to declare a defaced tire illegal, you may want to rethink your theory. I've had UMP tell me I had to replace a tire because some of the writing on the tire had been rubbed off (from contact with another car) They didn't need a lab to enforce it.Originally posted by Barbecueboy View PostIt's been posted numerous times about the scuffing........but who knows......I haven't seen the results as to what didn't match where, you?
I read somewhere that somebody also said all 5 tires were missing something too.........and that wasn't true either.
Comment
-
Scott is quoted in a DoD article and victory lane video interviews that the tire test results showed something was MISSING from the tire, not ADDED. I think that is the biggest argument of the appeal process, how does 1 remove a chemical from the tire....I don't pretend to be a chemical engineer.
Comment
-
chemistry. some chemicals when put together with neutralize eachother, then they're both gone. It's a big game and now being advertised as "undetectable".Originally posted by Tireguy17 View PostScott is quoted in a DoD article and victory lane video interviews that the tire test results showed something was MISSING from the tire, not ADDED. I think that is the biggest argument of the appeal process, how does 1 remove a chemical from the tire....I don't pretend to be a chemical engineer.
Comment
-
I never once said I believed that at all............anywhere.Originally posted by blncfn57 View PostIf you want to be bonehead enough to think UMP needs a lab to declare a defaced tire illegal, you may want to rethink your theory. I've had UMP tell me I had to replace a tire because some of the writing on the tire had been rubbed off (from contact with another car) They didn't need a lab to enforce it.
I do believe however , in your pitiful attempt to do nothing but discredit everything BBQ you are forgetting what you and others have said on the subject.
I.e........all 5 tires were missing something, don't believe all 5 were......the scuffing allegation that has been mentioned multiple times and you act like its some new revelation.......etc.
maybe we can get a look at the results to see what exactly was wrong with each tire to clear it up........surely they put that out there somewhere, right?
So do me a favor........( and I'm totally good with the dialogue)but if you are going to hang on my a$$, try to keep up and try to get it right.Where is the move over flag when you need it?????
Comment
-
So it was only Scott that said that???........one of the 4m justice league experts said it was all 5 of them.Originally posted by Tireguy17 View PostScott is quoted in a DoD article and victory lane video interviews that the tire test results showed something was MISSING from the tire, not ADDED. I think that is the biggest argument of the appeal process, how does 1 remove a chemical from the tire....I don't pretend to be a chemical engineer.
Ironically, I think that same guy is a chemical engineer.......he's up to speed on all of the processes and speaks with authority on them.Where is the move over flag when you need it?????
Comment
Comment