Rockets New Longhorn

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • 7uptruckracer
    Senior Member
    • May 2009
    • 1336

    #1

    Rockets New Longhorn

    Saw the pictures of the chassis. Looks pretty familiar. lol Maybe this will redeem them for the orange chassis
  • racer2e
    Member
    • Jan 2012
    • 54

    #2
    Where can I see these pictures?

    Comment

    • 7uptruckracer
      Senior Member
      • May 2009
      • 1336

      #3
      Rockets Facebook Page, It's a lot different from their other chassis. Bolt on Link Brackets. Cage moved. Just a whole redesign. Interesting I would like to see the component sheet. Bet that won't be available unless you buy the chassis lol I know where one will be in a few weeks.....

      Comment

      • fwdbite
        Member
        • Mar 2009
        • 40

        #4
        Looks identical to the Orange in the rear minus the brackets

        Comment

        • 7uptruckracer
          Senior Member
          • May 2009
          • 1336

          #5
          Our underslung orange doesn't look like that....
          Originally posted by fwdbite View Post
          Looks identical to the Orange in the rear minus the brackets

          Comment

          • fwdbite
            Member
            • Mar 2009
            • 40

            #6
            Im talking about how the rear clip is designed. On closer look it is different than ours.
            Last edited by fwdbite; 12-01-2015, 02:34 PM.

            Comment

            • catgo22
              Senior Member
              • May 2007
              • 317

              #7
              Not smarta$$ questions. But I can't figure out what difference the tail section makes - all that behind the link brackets? All it does in my brain is hold the fuel cell and brace the rollbar. And moving the cage in - if you have to have ballast anyway, what difference does that make? I can see how the front geometry can make a difference. But all this other stuff seems like marketing to me.

              Comment

              • billetbirdcage
                Senior Member
                • May 2007
                • 2019

                #8
                Originally posted by catgo22 View Post
                Not smarta$$ questions. But I can't figure out what difference the tail section makes - all that behind the link brackets? All it does in my brain is hold the fuel cell and brace the rollbar. And moving the cage in - if you have to have ballast anyway, what difference does that make? I can see how the front geometry can make a difference. But all this other stuff seems like marketing to me.
                It can change the rigidity of the back of the car and therefor the rigidity of the rear shock/spring mounts as well as the rigidity of the car as a whole.

                Comment

                • Matt49
                  Senior Member
                  • Jun 2007
                  • 3123

                  #9
                  Lower moment of inertia, anyone? My belief is that this is part of the reason behind the trending of shorter down tubes coming off the back of the halo. Starting to look more like northeast modifieds in the back these days.

                  Comment

                  • 7uptruckracer
                    Senior Member
                    • May 2009
                    • 1336

                    #10
                    Thats what i'm thinking I think they are compacting the polar moment as close as possible and lowering But mounting lead ballast higher if that makes sense.... dunno need more toilet thinking time lol
                    Originally posted by Matt49 View Post
                    Lower moment of inertia, anyone? My belief is that this is part of the reason behind the trending of shorter down tubes coming off the back of the halo. Starting to look more like northeast modifieds in the back these days.

                    Comment

                    • Bcollins82
                      Senior Member
                      • Jul 2009
                      • 322

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Matt49 View Post
                      Lower moment of inertia, anyone? My belief is that this is part of the reason behind the trending of shorter down tubes coming off the back of the halo. Starting to look more like northeast modifieds in the back these days.
                      I believe that the reason you see shorter down tubes is because everyone is going to an underrail rear clip and stiffening cars up. It's very common to build an underrail car like that, and it's been done for years. I believe if it was lower moment center they were really going after you'd see some funky fuel cells also, not just shorter rear down tubes. My thoughts on Rocket moving the cage to the right is most likely because Longhorn did it so Rocket copied it. Just like the bolt on 4 link brackets, bolt on rear upper shock mounts, plate style crossmember, upper control arm mount redesign with removable slugs, copied Rumley device for the LR, etc, etc... That's kinda Rockets thing. Haha

                      Comment

                      • powerslide
                        Senior Member
                        • May 2007
                        • 2696

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Bcollins82 View Post
                        My thoughts on Rocket moving the cage to the right is most likely because Longhorn did it so Rocket copied it. Just like the bolt on 4 link brackets, bolt on rear upper shock mounts, plate style crossmember, upper control arm mount redesign with removable slugs, copied Rumley device for the LR, etc, etc... That's kinda Rockets thing. Haha
                        No that cannot be... He hired a bunch of engineers and designed this new car... Its right on the DoD website so it must be true...

                        Comment

                        • Lizardracing
                          Senior Member
                          • Sep 2009
                          • 839

                          #13
                          Is that cause engineers are never wrong with all that mythical math?

                          Comment

                          • Kwoods25
                            Senior Member
                            • Jul 2014
                            • 455

                            #14
                            I think them changing stuff to bolt on brackets. Is user friendly. Longhorn might have come up with the idea but its just much simpler that way. Everyone knows its monkey see monkey do in this sport. Everyone has been trying to replicate what Rumley has done not just Rocket.

                            Comment

                            • TALON75
                              Senior Member
                              • May 2007
                              • 887

                              #15
                              Capitol has had bolt on brackets for years, one thing Rumley actually copied .
                              www.RACE91.com

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X