trump getting rid of ethanol

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Clayton_Wetter
    Banned
    • May 2007
    • 16671

    #46
    Australia’s Great Barrier Reef is not being killed off because of “global warming” or any other allegedly man-made non-problem, the people who know the area best have confirmed.
    According to local newspaper The Courier-Mail [paywalled]

    Teams of divers in a joint two-week expedition sponsored by Mike Ball Dive and Spirit of Freedom surveyed 28 sites on 24 outer shelf reefs along a 300km section of the hardest-hit part of the reef from Bathurst Head to Raine Island.

    Spirit of Freedom owner Chris Eade said reports of 93 per cent bleaching on the 2300km long Great Barrier Reef had made global headlines and damaged the reputation of the $5 billion reef tourism industry.

    “Scientists had written off that entire northern section as a complete white-out,’’ Mr Eade said.

    “We expected the worst. But it is tremendous condition, most of it is pristine, the rest is in full recovery.

    “It shows the resilience of the reef.’’

    Mike Ball Dive Expeditions operations manager Craig Stephen, who conducted a similar survey on the remote reefs 20 years ago, said there had been almost no change in two decades despite the latest coral bleaching event.

    “It wasn’t until we got underwater that we could get a true picture of what percentage of reef was bleached,’’ Mr Stephen said.

    “The discrepancy is phenomenal. It is so wrong. Everywhere we have been we have found healthy reefs.

    “There has been a great disservice to the Great Barrier Reef and tourism and it has not been good for our industry.”

    All right, so it’s local dive operators saying this stuff and, of course, they have a vested interested in keeping the tourist industry alive.

    But if we’re talking vested interests, what about all the marine biologists and environmental activists whose funding is dependent on promoting catastrophism and junk-scientific environmental scares like “ocean acidification”?

    According to one scaremongering report earlier this year only 7 percent of the reef remains undamaged by “coral bleaching” – one of the dire consequences, we’re repeatedly informed by experts, of global warming.

    However, this was based on a survey by a local environmental activist, Professor Terry Hughes whose National Coral Bleaching Task Force is naturally somewhat dependent on proving there is a major problem. As Jo Nova reports, its findings were considered so suspect that the chairman of the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Russell Reichelt refused to endorse them in a planned joint statement. This is how Graham Lloyd reported it in the Australian [paywalled]

    Dr Reichelt said maps accompanying the research had been misleading, exaggerating the (not a nice word)impact. “I don’t know whether it was a deliberate sleight of hand or lack of geographic knowledge but it certainly suits the purpose of the people who sent it out,” he said.

    “This is a frightening enough story with the facts, you don’t need to dress them up. We don’t want to be seen as saying there is no (not a nice word)problem out there but we do want people to understand there is a lot of the reef that is unscathed.”

    Dr Reichelt said there had been widespread misinterpretation of how much of the reef had died.

    “We’ve seen headlines stating that 93 per cent of the reef is prac(not a nice word)tic(not a nice word)ally dead,” he said.

    The problem is that “Great Barrier Reef doing just fine” stories don’t grab headlines in quite the way “Great Barrier Reef is doomed and it’s all our fault” stories do. It is, after all, one of the Seven Great Natural Wonders of the World – and therefore quite a big deal. This is why, along with polar bears and melting ice caps, it is so often seized on by climate campaigners to promote their scare narrative.

    My advice is that if you ever find yourself anywhere near Cairns in Far North Queensland and you’re wondering whether or not to fork out for your Great Barrier Reef dive experience is definitely, definitely to do it.

    The journey to the reef takes a couple of hours and it’s such a mass market experience you do feel a bit like herded cattle. Also, the sea is so rough that I’d say about 50 per cent of everyone who goes ends up vomiting furiously.

    But when you get there, it’s just great. Coral and other marine life of a size and variety you’re unlikely to see anywhere else.

    Comment

    • Clayton_Wetter
      Banned
      • May 2007
      • 16671

      #47
      Balljoint, you have to really be careful or it is very easy to get mislead by the flood of propaganda and misinformation on the internet. We are living in a time of the globalist movement and are being flooded with agenda driven misinformation and lies.

      Not saying that you are totally wrong but just pointing how easy it is to be mislead. We are living in times of much deception.

      Comment

      • mudslinger47
        Banned
        • May 2007
        • 3452

        #48
        Originally posted by balljoint View Post
        The oceans will be dead by 2030.
        So will I, so what?

        You actually think the we, man, can affect anything on this earth that God created that God doesn't want to happen? Are you that stupid?

        Comment

        • a25rjr
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2016
          • 3774

          #49
          Originally posted by mudslinger47 View Post
          So will I, so what?

          You actually think the we, man, can affect anything on this earth that God created that God doesn't want to happen? Are you that stupid?
          Good one, mud!

          Im pretty sure he posted that he doesn't believe in the Bible......but I would bet, he would, if someone set him on fire!
          Turn LEFT, Vote RIGHT!

          Comment

          • mudslinger47
            Banned
            • May 2007
            • 3452

            #50
            Originally posted by a25rjr View Post
            Good one, mud!

            Im pretty sure he posted that he doesn't believe in the Bible......but I would bet, he would, if someone set him on fire!

            If he doesn't start believing, someone will start him on fire...... and it will never go out and he will never die....

            Comment

            • balljoint
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2011
              • 1774

              #51
              Originally posted by a25rjr View Post
              You know not what you speak of!

              Please educate yourself about "glyphosphate" before you post! Stop falling for tree-hugger websites info!
              Originally posted by mudslinger47 View Post

              You actually think the we, man, can affect anything on this earth that God created that God doesn't want to happen? Are you that stupid?
              Trolls are going ballastic about this all over web. You two clowns are right on cue!

              Must be some truth.

              Good to get some input from some knowledgable scientists. Thanks for your contribution. Internet forums wouldnt be the same without people like you.

              Comment

              • balljoint
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2011
                • 1774

                #52
                Originally posted by Clayton_Wetter View Post
                Balljoint, you have to really be careful or it is very easy to get mislead by the flood of propaganda and misinformation on the internet. We are living in a time of the globalist movement and are being flooded with agenda driven misinformation and lies.

                Not saying that you are totally wrong but just pointing how easy it is to be mislead. We are living in times of much deception.
                That globalist movement is pro Monsanto/Bayer. Right?

                Comment

                • mudslinger47
                  Banned
                  • May 2007
                  • 3452

                  #53
                  Originally posted by balljoint View Post
                  Trolls are going ballastic about this all over web. You two clowns are right on cue!

                  Must be some truth.

                  Good to get some input from some knowledgable scientists. Thanks for your contribution. Internet forums wouldnt be the same without people like you.
                  Our job to plant the seed, God's job to water it and your choice to receive it.... Your decision neither helps me or harms me... its all about you...

                  Comment

                  • buster83
                    Senior Member
                    • Jun 2007
                    • 1878

                    #54
                    by the time glyphosate if and did get to ocean it would be diluted down it would absolutely do nothing,it diluted down when farmers get it and even more when it` in your local store the key to it is mixing soap with it so it will stick than after a hard rain it pretty much dissolved away 99% of run off kills nothing.it`s been around since the early 60`s and their is more than agriculture industry making it besides Monsanto.

                    Comment

                    • balljoint
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2011
                      • 1774

                      #55
                      Originally posted by mudslinger47 View Post
                      If he doesn't start believing, someone will start him on fire...... and it will never go out and he will never die....
                      Off topic. Start up a biblical thread if you desire. God and I are good.

                      Comment

                      • a25rjr
                        Senior Member
                        • Feb 2016
                        • 3774

                        #56
                        Originally posted by buster83 View Post
                        by the time glyphosate if and did get to ocean it would be diluted down it would absolutely do nothing,it diluted down when farmers get it and even more when it` in your local store the key to it is mixing soap with it so it will stick than after a hard rain it pretty much dissolved away 99% of run off kills nothing.it`s been around since the early 60`s and their is more than agriculture industry making it besides Monsanto.
                        He just copies and pastes from liberal websites. All he would have to do is read the product label.....where it states...."there is no residual left in the soil after the initial spray". Roundup is a non-selective weed control that only kills what it is sprayed on. If you spray it on the bark of woody plants it will negate the effect. It works better when sprayed on the leaves.

                        btw.....I worked in that industry for 20 plus years!
                        Turn LEFT, Vote RIGHT!

                        Comment

                        • Clayton_Wetter
                          Banned
                          • May 2007
                          • 16671

                          #57
                          Originally posted by balljoint View Post
                          That globalist movement is pro Monsanto/Bayer. Right?
                          The ends justify the means.

                          Comment

                          • balljoint
                            Senior Member
                            • Aug 2011
                            • 1774

                            #58
                            Originally posted by Clayton_Wetter View Post
                            The ends justify the means.
                            Depopulation?
                            Sustainable Development?

                            2030 agenda 21


                            What's wrong with eating a weed?? People did it for years. Why do we need to export crops?? Stay within the means. Big farms and exporting is bad for earth. Balance Daniel son.
                            Last edited by balljoint; 03-21-2017, 04:15 PM.

                            Comment

                            • balljoint
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2011
                              • 1774

                              #59
                              Originally posted by a25rjr View Post
                              He just copies and pastes from liberal websites. All he would have to do is read the product label.....where it states...."there is no residual left in the soil after the initial spray". Roundup is a non-selective weed control that only kills what it is sprayed on. If you spray it on the bark of woody plants it will negate the effect. It works better when sprayed on the leaves.

                              btw.....I worked in that industry for 20 plus years!
                              Thanks for the input. Enlightening...Always trust product label. Why would they lie? Haha some people..

                              Comment

                              • a25rjr
                                Senior Member
                                • Feb 2016
                                • 3774

                                #60
                                Originally posted by balljoint View Post
                                Thanks for the input. Enlightening...Always trust product label. Why would they lie? Haha some people..
                                Yeah, some people will believe ANYTHING......esp from liberal tree-hugger websites!

                                Theres this little org called EPA. Do you know how much testing a chemical has to go through before it is approved?....... I didn't think so!
                                Turn LEFT, Vote RIGHT!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X