Impeachment news.

[STRONGERTHANDIRT]

According to CBS news poll, 55% of Americans support impeachment inquiry.

[ALLDIRT]

According to CBS news poll, 55% of Americans support impeachment inquiry.

That's that fake news . What they didn't put on that poll was , that's Democrat Americans .
Not the rest of us .

[Barbecueboy]

Hillary running as an independent.

[Bob Hubbard]

politicians

Phil Robertson: Hey, Bernie, Where Exactly Did You 'Work' for Your Millions? .....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wy4mBnVxTzs

[Raceready]

Google is putting all of the fake polls first when using their search engine. People's voices and postings are getting censored. And if allowed they will be put last on searches. Yahoo the same.

Gotta agree with you.

[ss12]

Was the fake news wrong about the whistleblower too? CW why don't you take a poll on race gossip DLM section and see how Trump stands up. I noticed you have only been DLM section one time since you been back. Looks like to me you are scared to post anything over there.

[ss12]

A favor for whom? Himself or his country? The way I see it, The president, whomever he may be at the time, is representing the American people when he speaks with foreign leader. Asking a foreign leader to look into a corruption investigation that was squelched by a former administration is IN THE INTEREST OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE. So, Trump was asking for a favor on own behalf. Ask anyone who voted for Trump this question, I think most of them feel the same way. So, Trump is not asking for a personal favor at all. He's asking for a favor for the country as a whole. There is nothing illegal about that. And again, if we've gotten to the point where some people think that's wrong, then it truly demonstrates how immoral our government and the news media has become.

And the transcript of the phone call supports this. When Trump mentions the Biden incident, he immediately follows with the phrase "a lot of people want to know about this". That's shows it's not a personal request. "A lot of people wanting to know" is not a personal favor.

Any educated citizen knows what the conman was asking for. It had nothing to do with the majority of the American citizens. It might have some interest with the Trumpturds and that a very small %.

[dirtMAN007]

Any educated citizen knows what the conman was asking for. It had nothing to do with the majority of the American citizens. It might have some interest with the Trumpturds and that a very small %.

You mean that very small % that elected him and has made you and your kind sooooooo butt hurt ? Is that the small % you speak of ? And by the way that % grows more everyday with all the stupid BS you and your kind keep bringing forward ! THE ROADRUNNER STRIKES AGAIN ! You coyotes are just too stupid to see it ! But coyotes will be coyotes !

[STRONGERTHANDIRT]

Subpoena just issued to Guiliani. Uh-oh!

[STRONGERTHANDIRT]

Impeachment inquiry...feel better?

[Stefan2k4]

Any educated citizen knows what the conman was asking for.

That's what is called "speculation" and unless there is some more substantial evidence to support it. it means nothing. The problem with speculation is that it's so very subjective and like beauty, is entirely in the eye of the beholder. It's like the blind men touching the elephant. Each one, in their own mind's eye sees something different. What they see is based upon their own life experience and not on the reality of what they are actually touching. In essence they all see what they want to see and not the reality. The Jerry nadler's, adam shciff's, and Nancy Pelosi's look at the transcript of the phone conversation and see an impeachable offense. But that's because in their own mind's eye they so desperately want it to be. They've spent the last 3 years preaching to the world that Trump is a terrible awful person who doesn't deserve to be president. They've became so invested in this narrative that they've deluded themselves. Just like the blind men they see something that in reality is totally different.

It had nothing to do with the majority of the American citizens. It might have some interest with the Trumpturds and that a very small %.

If anything comes of this "inquiry", there will be a trial in the senate. The chief justice will preside over it. And the jury will be much more fair and balanced than these radicals in the house who mostly come from gerrymandered congressional districts. At the end of the day, it will come down to explaining to the American people how asking that a world leader look into possible corruption and obstruction of justice, can possibly be a crime and worthy or removing a dully elected president from office. We're talking about undoing an election and disenfranchising millions of voters by nullifying their vote. They will have to explain how and why that's justified. Simply saying "he's a bad man and we know it" isn't enough!

[Raceready]

I'll post when I good and well feel like it and anywhere. There is not much going on that isn't beating a dead horse over there and I sure don't see you burning up the threads over there either. You post a poll over there. Maybe there is no real whistle blower ya fool.....

Sir : Perhaps with the infinite knowledge that you possess, you might answer a burning inquiry ? Help me out on this one, please. I've always understood in my later days of 60 some years of racing that anybody that loves and is in the business of racing always votes for the right party ? As the common sense fans will be alert enough to tell the pretender race fans, we cannot allow any voting for the Democratic party which is so concerned for the environment which would cause racing panic about the run-off mud from watering the track polluting the waterways, the cars open engines creating noise pollution, the waste of precious fossil fuel that isn't used to propel public transportation, not to mention the very horrible toxic fumes from the tire, exhaust, and dust that is pollution for sure. This is why I am greatly concerned as to WHY the malcontents on the other section would set you up to be banned for your statements that were at the very least the TRUTH ? I personally know many people in the racing world that their mantra is to vote for the party that will help them for the best. I am very sure that if most of the sponsors that advertise on here knew that longtime, true, and honest race fans were being set up to be banned only on their political slants then they would withdraw their ads. This board has lost a lot of patrons on the banning of the biggest draw to the site since the sites inception ! I don't believe that in the interest of common sense and what we can do to preserve the future of our beloved sport that one of our long time that a politically biased moderator can take the voice of somebody that has done more to bring new members to this board than anyone prior. I would not be surprised one bit if members start calling the manufactures on here and they say " I will not endorse your product knowing that you have blackballed a longtime member based on the fact that he does not agree with your liberal AGENDA ! BOYCOTT their products if there is not an apology delivered. We didn't ask for this but a few politically incorrect members that believe that all of the members should be in a union job like they have and that anybody that isn't man enough to think for their selves should not be able to state their true mind.

[anthonycacace]

Anyone else see irony in quite a few 'real American' Conservatives (i.e. - We the People who don't live along the coasts.) putting all their efforts toward protection and advancement of a family dynasty 'Monied Manhattan Man' who also happens to be an ex-Democrat?

Just wonderin'

[anthonycacace]

No, I see no connection.

As you are someone who struggles with basic reading comprehension and has previously shown an inability to tell fact from opinion, it's logical how such a complex juxtaposition as the situation put forth would be of little value (or humor) to you.

Also, the use of a double negative here negates such a factor when using proper English grammar. So, you actually do see the connection then? Just wonderin'

[dirtMAN007]

As you are someone who struggles with basic reading comprehension and has previously shown an inability to tell fact from opinion, it's logical how such a complex juxtaposition as the situation put forth would be of little value (or humor) to you.

Also, the use of a double negative here negates such a factor when using proper English grammar. So, you actually do see the connection then? Just wonderin'

Who you tryin to impress ?