A few thoughts

[ALLDIRT]

Please cut and paste and post the part of the phone conversation that you are referencing above, from the linked Whitehouse PDF.

Telephone Conversation with President Zelenskyy of Ukraine -
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-conten...ied09.2019.pdf

lurker , don't you love how gullible they are . They are easy prey for the Democrats .

[kidrock]

dirtman , i think it is the definition of the word FACTS that they are having the most trouble with , when one starts interpreting hear say and second and third hand info as FACT , well , there is your problem , now what lurker posted about yonavovitch is a fact , but with there new interpretation of the word fact , it will be over looked....

Really I'm asking for all to testify. Not so sure what so hard to figure out here. We have people who have already testified and now we should have those with first hand knowledge either corroborate their testimony or show they have been lying. How about it you guys want it or are you afraid what they might say. I know I'm not bring it on. Only if your guilty would you keep people from testifying. If your innocent let them tell your side and exonerate you. Let the FACTS come out and then lets see who has a problem with FACTS.

[fastford]

dirtman , i think it is the definition of the word FACTS that they are having the most trouble with , when one starts interpreting hear say and second and third hand info as FACT , well , there is your problem , now what lurker posted about yonavovitch is a fact , but with there new interpretation of the word fact , it will be over looked....

[dirtMAN007]

Now that we are in the TRIAL phase it would be nice to hear from everyone. Call your senators and tell them you want to hear from the Biden's, Mick, John, Pompeo, Perry and lets see if they corroborate what others have already testified under oath. Then we will see who's lying and who isn't. I would think the President would welcome that. It could exonerate him and he wouldn't have have the people in the country believing he is guilty and needs to be removed from office.

No need to prove your innocence in this great country , your innocence is a given until PROVEN guilty ! You libtards had your chance but blew it ! He l l even illegals are afforded that right !

[kidrock]

Now that we are in the TRIAL phase it would be nice to hear from everyone. Call your senators and tell them you want to hear from the Biden's, Mick, John, Pompeo, Perry and lets see if they corroborate what others have already testified under oath. Then we will see who's lying and who isn't. I would think the President would welcome that. It could exonerate him and he wouldn't have have the people in the country believing he is guilty and needs to be removed from office.

[dirtMAN007]

Sorry but that was already established through witnesses testimony in the impeachment inquiry. Had nothing to do with that phone call.

That is why there doesn’t need to be a trial in the Senate cuz there are no fact based witnesses to shed any light on anything ! All hearsay and gossip but no facts of which I thought you were such a fan of S ERIOUSLY S TUPID ?

[lurker]

Sorry but that was already established through witnesses testimony in the impeachment inquiry. Had nothing to do with that phone call.

That’s exactly what I thought your response would be. Citing second-hand testimony, from sources not directly involved in the phone call. That point I just made is fact based established. You do understand that the credibility of the majority of the “witnesses” is, IMHO, weak at very best, and fairly one-sided anti-Trump. Also, I hope you realize that Marie Yovanovitch perjured herself before Congress during her (see attached link below) impeachment inquiry testimony. The mainstream news doesn’t cover items like that as it does not fit the narrative or view ship they seek.

I think this comes down to personal interpretation regarding ones predisposed opinion about Trump. Nothing more, nothing less. And I’m fine with that. If you don’t like Trump, that’s fine and its your right. Just be honest (transparent / direct) about it, and any predisposed judgment you might have, when posting.

I’m all for rule of the law and impeachment if needed. But in this case, its my opinion impeachment is not needed, given the facts I’ve read, listened to, and the impeachment inquiry itself I watched most of on television. Not just fake news sound bites from any chosen network ----- but the impeachment inquiry itself, and I watched the greater majority of it.


Yuriy Lutsenko says Yovanovitch perjured herself before Congress -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KgKGjoIkaXU

[Barbecueboy]

sssssssssssold.........

[ss12]

Please cut and paste and post the part of the phone conversation that you are referencing above, from the linked Whitehouse PDF.

Telephone Conversation with President Zelenskyy of Ukraine -
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-conten...ied09.2019.pdf

Sorry but that was already established through witnesses testimony in the impeachment inquiry. Had nothing to do with that phone call.

[fastford]

exactly what i was getting ready to post as well lurker , i will be waiting to,.,,

[lurker]

When he indicated that he didn't care if they didn't have any evidence but just say you are starting an investigation and I will released the military aid. I have a problem with that.

Please cut and paste and post the part of the phone conversation that you are referencing above, from the linked Whitehouse PDF.

Telephone Conversation with President Zelenskyy of Ukraine -
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-conten...ied09.2019.pdf

[Clayton_Wetters]

Not frustrated . Annoyed . And I read enough of your post , when you talk about a level .
From your previous post of your life , I know you could not step up to my level at this point
in your life . And a Ouija board won't help you .

Not even a Trumpy Bear could help this guy. lol

[ALLDIRT]

Oh Alldirt you sound a little frustrated. Do I need to go "down" to your level and start calling you names like a little kid would do? I don't have a problem with the IMPOTUS investigating the previous administration as long he doesn't have a malice intent. When he indicated that he didn't care if they didn't have any evidence but just say you are starting an investigation and I will released the military aid. I have a problem with that. When your whole intent was just to hurt your competition for a political advantage is just wrong. You don't have to worry about me voting. I do a lot of research before I vote!

Not frustrated . Annoyed . And I read enough of your post , when you talk about a level .
From your previous post of your life , I know you could not step up to my level at this point
in your life . And a Ouija board won't help you .

[Clayton_Wetters]

Oh Alldirt you sound a little frustrated. Do I need to go "down" to your level and start calling you names like a little kid would do? I don't have a problem with the IMPOTUS investigating the previous administration as long he doesn't have a malice intent. When he indicated that he didn't care if they didn't have any evidence but just say you are starting an investigation and I will released the military aid. I have a problem with that. When your whole intent was just to hurt your competition for a political advantage is just wrong. You don't have to worry about me voting. I do a lot of research before I vote!

Trouble is , your research is all smut like VOX, Slate, Mother Jones, The Young Jerks, and the NY Times.

[ss12]

Man your just plain slow or dumb . I can't believe you can't get it . Its not the past idt .
what can't you understand . they have been robbing us for the last thirty / forty years . And
you fools see nothing wrong with the President looking for the evidence on the last administration , on finding crime . I won't comment on your ignorance anymore , because voters
like you are what worry me . So Its not the past , it is the future , from keeping Democrats out
of office .

Oh Alldirt you sound a little frustrated. Do I need to go "down" to your level and start calling you names like a little kid would do? I don't have a problem with the IMPOTUS investigating the previous administration as long he doesn't have a malice intent. When he indicated that he didn't care if they didn't have any evidence but just say you are starting an investigation and I will released the military aid. I have a problem with that. When your whole intent was just to hurt your competition for a political advantage is just wrong. You don't have to worry about me voting. I do a lot of research before I vote!