Senate forces SURPRISE VOTE on Epstein Files…AND IT PASSES!!

[Tyy7777]

Think about this one.

Both Bill and Hillary Clinton have received congressional subpoenas to come testify in the Epstein case. Both Bill and Hillary Clinton have ignored their congressional subpoenas.

Now contrast when both Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro ignored congressional subpoenas. They both were thrown in the klink for that by the Biden DOJ. So, should the Trump DOJ do the same in this matter? I mean really, if the DOJ is so independent and above it all like someone would like us to believe than shouldn't the reactions to ignoring congressional subpoenas be dealt with in like and similar ways?

I think we understand that if Bill and Hillary were brought to testimony it would be awkward and embarrassing to hear the - I don't recall, I don't remember, I plead the Fifth, are we still talking about this, at this point what difference does it make, or just flat out being caught in lies. Having Epstein to the White House 17 times and riding on his plane at least 26 times I'm sure Bill could shed some light on things but I'd also hazard a guess that his memory is probably starting to go (rather conveniently).

Also consider this. Does anyone think if Harris actually pulled off a miracle and won and this Epstein stuff was still out there, would the Dems have voted for the release in the same manner as they did under this administration? Would Harris have signed the bill? Sure, ya, you betcha.

Which party made the Epstein files apart of their campaign?

[Tyy7777]

Think about this one.

Both Bill and Hillary Clinton have received congressional subpoenas to come testify in the Epstein case. Both Bill and Hillary Clinton have ignored their congressional subpoenas.

Now contrast when both Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro ignored congressional subpoenas. They both were thrown in the klink for that by the Biden DOJ. So, should the Trump DOJ do the same in this matter? I mean really, if the DOJ is so independent and above it all like someone would like us to believe than shouldn't the reactions to ignoring congressional subpoenas be dealt with in like and similar ways?

I think we understand that if Bill and Hillary were brought to testimony it would be awkward and embarrassing to hear the - I don't recall, I don't remember, I plead the Fifth, are we still talking about this, at this point what difference does it make, or just flat out being caught in lies. Having Epstein to the White House 17 times and riding on his plane at least 26 times I'm sure Bill could shed some light on things but I'd also hazard a guess that his memory is probably starting to go (rather conveniently).

Also consider this. Does anyone think if Harris actually pulled off a miracle and won and this Epstein stuff was still out there, would the Dems have voted for the release in the same manner as they did under this administration? Would Harris have signed the bill? Sure, ya, you betcha.

Who said I was ok with that?

It's pretty clear Bubba was a sick 1uck.

[lurker]

Wh

o said I was ok with that?

It’s not what you say, Ty ---------- it’s what your repeatedly insinuate to us “idiots” post after post.

Nice backpeddle though.

[lurker]

Which party made the Epstein files apart of their campaign?

Where‘s the “dirt” you were talking about?

[Tyy7777]

[COLOR=#000000][FONT=Comic Sans MS]


It’s not what you say, Ty ---------- it’s what your repeatedly insinuate to us “idiots” post after post.

Nice backpeddle though.

I have never once indicated that I A) didn't think Bubba was involved the Epstein and B) That I was ok with it.

[Tyy7777]

Where‘s the “dirt” you were talking about?

Well if you actually bothered to take off those rose-colored glasses of yours and read some of the emails you might find something.

The rest is in the DOJ's records and we'll just have to wait and see won't we?

[lurker]

Well if you actually bothered to take off those rose-colored glasses of yours and read some of the emails you might find something.

More gaslighting.


If there was something in the Epstein files that implicated Trump, we’d ALL know by now from Schutzstaffel12 and his drive-by posts.


You two are chasing nothingburgers made from unicorns.

[lurker]

Which party made the Epstein files apart of their campaign?

Trump! And at this point, who cares.


All of the Epstein files released to date are available in PDF for you to post.


Post away.

[Tyy7777]

Trump! And at this point, who cares.


All of the Epstein files released to date are available in PDF for you to post.


Post away.

What files?

[lurker]

Yes, many of the released Jeffrey Epstein documents are available in PDF format, primarily through official government websites and news organizations that have published them online

Here are the primary sources where you can find these files:

• U.S. House Oversight Committee: The committee has released over 33,000 pages of records provided by the Department of Justice and the Epstein estate. These can be accessed directly from their website.
• U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ): The DOJ has released various documents, including the first phase of declassified files and FBI memos, available for download as PDFs from their site.
• U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP): Specific records, such as travel and flight logs, have been released through the CBP website as PDFs under FOIA requests.
• Congress.gov: Text and PDF versions of legislation related to the release of these files, such as the Epstein Files Transparency Act, are available on the officialCongress.gov website.
• News Organizations and Document Repositories: Several news outlets and independent repositories (like DocumentCloud and Hugging Face datasets) have compiled and hosted these documents in various formats, including PDFs, for public access.

Keep in mind that many of the documents released to date were already part of the public record through previous court cases and Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, and many documents have redactions to protect victim identities and other sensitive information. The Epstein Files Transparency Act aims to consolidate all unclassified records into a single, searchable format in the near future.

There's bound to be “dirt” on Trump in those. Post away!

<HQ source>

[Tyy7777]

More gaslighting.


If there was something in the Epstein files that implicated Trump, we’d ALL know by now from Schutzstaffel12 and his drive-by posts.


You two are chasing nothingburgers made from unicorns.

We haven't seen the 'Epstein Files'.

What we do know is they are very delayed. Bit weird how Trump backflipped on not releasing them. Especially when you consider he ordered an investigation relating to Epstein right before that...which would make releasing files pertaining to Epstein very difficult.

[Tyy7777]

There's bound to be “dirt” on Trump in those. Post away!

<HQ source>

Using AI again I see.

I've shared some of the emails with you.

[lurker]

Yes I read your email links. You don’t have any real “dirt” on Trump or you’d post it. I’m done asking you about it.

[Tyy7777]

Yes I read your email links. You don’t have any real “dirt” on Trump or you’d post it. I’m done asking you about it.

Nope you're just dodging it. There's clear evidence there he was connected with Epstein right up until his death DESPITE having said he cut Epstein off years ago. Why don't you talk about that?

Why was Trump asking Epstein for Sec. Treas. candidates?

[lurker]

Nope you're just dodging it. There's clear evidence there he was connected with Epstein right up until his death DESPITE having said he cut Epstein off years ago. Why don't you talk about that? Why was Trump asking Epstein for Sec. Treas. candidates?

I didn't dodge it. It's just to the point I didn't think any of that was/is relevant in the bigger picture. You, on the other hand, do think both points are relevant in some way or another. I'm fine with that. So I don’t have a decent answer for either of your questions. Fair enough?


Additionally, I was looking for the part where Trump raped and molested 14 yro girls. I didn't find that part.