Trump Is Using Trade Policy To Enrich His Family

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ss12
    Senior Member
    • May 2007
    • 3730

    #1

    Trump Is Using Trade Policy To Enrich His Family

    Trump Is Using Trade Policy To Enrich His Family
    Haters don't really hate you, in fact they hate themselves because you are a reflection of what they wish to be.
  • lurker
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2017
    • 3186

    #2
    Name more, I’ll start —-----

    D!ck Cheney using War to enrich his family's wealth.

    Nancy Pelosi used insider trading to enrich her family's wealth.

    Comment

    • Morgs153
      Senior Member
      • Jan 2020
      • 840

      #3
      The Biden family in regards to Ukraine.

      The Clinton Foundation.

      The rags to riches story of Barry and Mike.

      How Bernie wound up being a 1% er.
      Political correctness,...is the inability to speak the truth about the obvious.

      Comment

      • Tyy7777
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2024
        • 596

        #4
        How about we all admit that using political status to enrich yourselves is wrong? That includes everyone on both sides.

        Comment

        • lurker
          Senior Member
          • Dec 2017
          • 3186

          #5
          Yes!!!!!!!!


          And while we’re at it, a 4 year term limit with a salary cap each year while in office. But I’m dreaming.

          Comment

          • Tyy7777
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2024
            • 596

            #6
            I actually think we should raise salaries of congress members.

            It would boost the quality of those running and ideally help curb corruption.

            $174k isn't exactly a lot for what they do.

            Comment

            • lurker
              Senior Member
              • Dec 2017
              • 3186

              #7

              That is a very interesting take.


              Elaborate if you would please. Not that I’d disagree with the dollar amount you noted as being low, per say, I’m wondering what you think a reasonable yearly salary would be?

              Dang it, I sure cannot remember the exact wording right now —------ but wasn't the intent with our Elected Officials service originally supposed to be for a limited time, and not meant to be for making lots of money. That’s very poor wording but hopefully people get where I’m going.

              Comment

              • Morgs153
                Senior Member
                • Jan 2020
                • 840

                #8
                $174k/annual maybe doesn't seem like a lot in this day and age but, look at the totality of everything involved in a compensation package for a congressional rep before going down the path of woe is they. I'm not saying that a bump up is not in order but there are things tied to their compensation package which goes beyond the simple $174k/yr in the way of expense accounts, staff hiring allowances, mailings, health insurance compensation, retirement packages, free parking in the DC area and airports (that alone is worth many thousands), book deals, some limited supplemental income (like for teaching or side gigs) etc. Not to mention, we still have some creative traders despite the light that has been shined on people like Pelosi.

                Citizen legislators or careerists. Which ones do we want?
                Political correctness,...is the inability to speak the truth about the obvious.

                Comment

                • Tyy7777
                  Senior Member
                  • Mar 2024
                  • 596

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Morgs153 View Post
                  $174k/annual maybe doesn't seem like a lot in this day and age but, look at the totality of everything involved in a compensation package for a congressional rep before going down the path of woe is they. I'm not saying that a bump up is not in order but there are things tied to their compensation package which goes beyond the simple $174k/yr in the way of expense accounts, staff hiring allowances, mailings, health insurance compensation, retirement packages, free parking in the DC area and airports (that alone is worth many thousands), book deals, some limited supplemental income (like for teaching or side gigs) etc. Not to mention, we still have some creative traders despite the light that has been shined on people like Pelosi.

                  Citizen legislators or careerists. Which ones do we want?
                  Oh for sure but if you want top-level people than you have to be prepared to fork out top level money. The things you mentioned are likely to be readily available for anyone worth a (not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word)(not a nice word) and with a bigger pay packet.

                  There is value in career politicians. I think there is obviously a point where some people stay too long and probably lose touch but experience in politics is good. You need to know how to get stuff done.

                  Comment

                  • Tyy7777
                    Senior Member
                    • Mar 2024
                    • 596

                    #10
                    Originally posted by lurker View Post
                    That is a very interesting take.


                    Elaborate if you would please. Not that I’d disagree with the dollar amount you noted as being low, per say, I’m wondering what you think a reasonable yearly salary would be?

                    Dang it, I sure cannot remember the exact wording right now —------ but wasn't the intent with our Elected Officials service originally supposed to be for a limited time, and not meant to be for making lots of money. That’s very poor wording but hopefully people get where I’m going.
                    Well at the end of the day if they get voted in they get voted in.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X