Tweet
Originally posted by buster83
View Post
-
never happen . but everyone should age not all are intitled to own a gun !!!!!something has tobe done. they might start with refunding mental heath the gop on thew state level has defunded mental health accross the country over the last 6 years. -
I see clayton every time I go to the big EOriginally posted by BusheetreatsComment
-
Just a little something to think about, no assault weapons used at Sandy Hook. All of obummers legislative ideas wouldn't have amounted to a hill of beans...
Comment
-
Pay attention witless one, no assault weapons were used at Sandy Hook. Ya got that ya dipstick?Originally posted by BusheetreatsComment
-
the gun they took out of the car was not an ar15, it was a pump action shotgun they unloaded from the side, ar15 is unloaded with charge handle.you got to watch the video in full screen.Comment
-
real high power there lmao doesn't matter what he had the kid was of his rockerOriginally posted by BusheetreatsComment
-
There are no federal restrictions on the ownership of AR-15 rifles in the United States. During the period 1994–2004 variants with certain features such as collapsible stocks, flash suppressors, and bayonet lugs were prohibited for sales to civilians by the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994, with the included Assault Weapons Ban. Included in this was a restriction on the pistol grip that protrudes beneath the stock, which was considered an accessory feature under the ban and was subject to restrictions. Some rifles were manufactured with a grip not described under the Ban installed in its place. Those AR-15s that were manufactured with those features, as well as the accompanying full capacity magazines, were stamped "Restricted Military/Government/Law Enforcement/Export Only". The restrictions only applied to guns manufactured after the ban took effect. It was legal to own, sell, or buy any gun built before 1994. Hundreds of thousands of pre-ban ARs were sold during the ban as well as new guns redesigned to be legal.Originally posted by buster83 View Post
Since the expiration of the Federal AWB in September 2004,[21] these features became legal in most states.[22] Since the expiration of the ban the manufacture and sale of then-restricted rifles has resumed completely.
At least two states regulate possession of AR-15 rifles either by the restriction of certain features or outright bans of certain manufacturers' models. For example: the A3 tactical carbine pictured above is legal for sale and possession in the United States generally, but is illegal for sale in California.
Under U.S. firearms laws, the lower receiver of the AR-15 is considered a firearm and subject to purchasing restrictions. (This is not universally the case with rifles. On some other rifles, such as the FN FAL, Heckler & Koch 91, 93, (G-3, G-33), 94, MP-5 or SP-89 (plus clones), the upper receiver is the serial-numbered part, and thus the firearm.) The AR-15 upper receiver assembly is considered a part, and may be purchased and mail-ordered in most locations. This is a desirable feature for enthusiasts, who can purchase a number of upper receivers (often in different calibers and barrel lengths) and interchange them with the same lower receiver.
Adding a shoulder stock to an AR-15 with a barrel shorter than 16" would constitute constructing a Short-Barreled Rifle (SBR) under NFA rules – subject to a $200 tax stamp. The receiver, or serial-numbered part is still considered a firearm, but a receiver has unique status assigned by the Gun Control Act of 1968 as amended, and ATF regulations or rulings. ATF ruling 07-07-2009 illustrates a receiver's unique legal status even if the receiver can only be made into a rifle.[23] Under the United States v. Thompson-Center Arms Company Supreme Court ruling, an individual can possess parts for both the rifle and pistol so long as they are not assembled improperly.[24] This ruling has been further clarified by the ATF Director in a ruling (ATF Ruling 2011-4[25]) dated July 25, 2011 which restates most of the findings in the Thompson case.
The ATF once[when?] claimed that the finding in United States v. Thompson-Center Arms Company only applies to products of Thompson Contender,[citation needed] and not to any other companies' products. This has changed[citation needed] under ATF ruling 2011–4 which statesComment
-
and your point a bomb in ok city was made out what fertilizer and killed how many people sep11 2001 also comes mind yep outlaw box cutters and try to that weapon to an army base and they would say nice toysComment
-
the point is besides on top of your head is a nut job will else any thing to get the job doneOriginally posted by Busheetreats
sandy hook just so happened to be a gun http://www.google.com/search?sourcei....0.VCp8fLISjuc http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/top-psych...ool-massacres/Comment
-
I have already posted a link from NBC news dated in middle January 2013, there were no AR 15's found in the school. NONE get your facts straight or at least get some facts, not the liberal talking points.... Don't make yourself look any more stupid then you have to, I can't bail you out everytime.... really messes up the talking points...Originally posted by BusheetreatsComment
-
the actual pictures that were shown was one Sig pistol one glock pistol and one ar15. and guns were in car. the media gave a lot of misleading information. the autopsy report was center-fire rifle three to eleven bullets in each victim.killer took own life with pistol.Comment
-
it took one brave man to walk in and kill 20 helpless children this very sad, depressing, and frustrating that anyone would do something like this,the media it depends which channel you watched,had a different story,as if they went into a state of shock,it probably did affect them i do`nt see how it could`nt emotionally. the six other teachers and principals should be awarded for taking a bullet and maybe saving a child. but still i support the right to have the arms of your wish.what we need to do is figure out is how to keep them out of the hands of somebody that may go postal.Comment
-
Originally posted by Busheetreats
And which to believe?
If I'm wrong, so be it.. no problem, but all we have to go on is the News..... They can't get it right, how can we?Comment
-
glenn beck Is right I need to move to texas
Comment
-
What about Planned Parenthood taking out 340,000 children last year??????? Have you any compassion for that???Originally posted by BusheetreatsComment
Comment