Hey, call me crazy but:

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mudslinger47
    Banned
    • May 2007
    • 3452

    #16
    Originally posted by ss12 View Post
    The reason people are running from the republican party is because of people like you. Even Fox's news are running from the status quo and now are replacing Rove,Palin,and Morris. Maybe you should contact them and see if you can get a job with them. LOL good luck!!
    You know why Rove and Morris are gone? Because they flat out lied. If they want to go with the GOP fine let them go, the GOP is losing people left and right, they have turned into Democrat lite. I got no use for them. There RINO's pure and simple...

    Comment

    • ss12
      Senior Member
      • May 2007
      • 3730

      #17
      Originally posted by mudslinger47 View Post
      You know why Rove and Morris are gone? Because they flat out lied. If they want to go with the GOP fine let them go, the GOP is losing people left and right, they have turned into Democrat lite. I got no use for them. There RINO's pure and simple...
      "Lying" isn't that part of the neo-conn gop platform? Thats why so many people are voting the way they are. They are tired of being lied too. You knew Romney and the GOP were lying so you voted for them anyway? There were more voting options out there that fit your agenda. If we keep voting for the same 2 parties nothing will change. These 2 parties are just puppets for the corporations. They quit working for the people a long time ago and the sooner we realize this the better things will get.
      Haters don't really hate you, in fact they hate themselves because you are a reflection of what they wish to be.

      Comment

      • mudslinger47
        Banned
        • May 2007
        • 3452

        #18
        Originally posted by ss12 View Post
        "Lying" isn't that part of the neo-conn gop platform? Thats why so many people are voting the way they are. They are tired of being lied too. You knew Romney and the GOP were lying so you voted for them anyway? There were more voting options out there that fit your agenda. If we keep voting for the same 2 parties nothing will change. These 2 parties are just puppets for the corporations. They quit working for the people a long time ago and the sooner we realize this the better things will get.
        I don't think Romney was lying, and Rove didn't show his true colors until a couple of weeks ago. Wasting your time voting for a fringe idiot is just that, a waste of time. You choose one of the major two parties and you take it back. All the rest will never amount to little more then 5%. And get off the neo-con BS, ya sound like some 14 yr old conspiracy nutburger. I'd bet you don't even know what one is. Tell me one administration that has lied more then this one, hell Klinton was the master and he can't hold a candle to this guy...

        Comment

        • Clayton_Wetter
          Banned
          • May 2007
          • 16671

          #19
          Originally posted by ss12 View Post
          "Lying" isn't that part of the neo-conn gop platform? Thats why so many people are voting the way they are. They are tired of being lied too. You knew Romney and the GOP were lying so you voted for them anyway? There were more voting options out there that fit your agenda. If we keep voting for the same 2 parties nothing will change. These 2 parties are just puppets for the corporations. They quit working for the people a long time ago and the sooner we realize this the better things will get.
          The billion dollar Obummer campaign convinced many low info voters that Romney (basically not lieing though you don't believe it) was lieing and at the same time put iceing on a turd for their own candidate the real liar.

          Comment

          • ss12
            Senior Member
            • May 2007
            • 3730

            #20
            Originally posted by Clayton_Wetter View Post
            The billion dollar Obummer campaign convinced many low info voters that Romney (basically not lieing though you don't believe it) was lieing and at the same time put iceing on a turd for their own candidate the real liar.
            Romney didn't spend a Billion? Romney lost because they didn't stay on track with unemployement. The republicans did an excellent job of getting off track and brought of a topic that most undeucated voter don't understand. Benghazi. The democrated media kept it on the air waves and the republicans kept it up. Then the perfect storm Sandy came. All of this and guess what Obama won. And you guys are still talking about it and everybody else has forgotten about it. Thats what happen when you are an old white guy. Stuck in time and not willing to change.
            Haters don't really hate you, in fact they hate themselves because you are a reflection of what they wish to be.

            Comment

            • Clayton_Wetter
              Banned
              • May 2007
              • 16671

              #21
              Originally posted by ss12 View Post
              Romney didn't spend a Billion? Romney lost because they didn't stay on track with unemployement. The republicans did an excellent job of getting off track and brought of a topic that most undeucated voter don't understand. Benghazi. The democrated media kept it on the air waves and the republicans kept it up. Then the perfect storm Sandy came. All of this and guess what Obama won. And you guys are still talking about it and everybody else has forgotten about it. Thats what happen when you are an old white guy. Stuck in time and not willing to change.
              Romney lost because of a smear campaign and a left wing media piling on him. As well as massive voter fraud, corrupted electronic voting machines, illegal aliens voting in mass amoung many other devises of the progressives movement. Romney may not be perfect but this election was determined before it even happened and the people have been given many spins to explain it. You choose your spin if you like. And as the video on a different thread stated, this administration has overrid an amendment going back to 1948 and given themselves the authority to use propaganda on its citizens in any form that they see fit.

              With an education in actual history many citizens who you want to ridicule as neoconservatives who don't want change, in reality know what the Progressives change is all about. The examples in Russia, Germany, Italy, Cuba, China and countless other nations in the past have all resulted in mass murder, starvation, loss of freedom, and economic collapse. How wise is it to "PROGRESS" into this again? And if you think these people that are trying to take over this nation now are any different in the least, then it is your own lack of perception and proper education that must be to blame. The Progressives will take us to a one world government, but not before millions of people die first.
              Last edited by Clayton_Wetter; 02-15-2013, 01:39 PM.

              Comment

              • ss12
                Senior Member
                • May 2007
                • 3730

                #22
                Originally posted by Clayton_Wetter View Post
                Romney lost because of a smear campaign and a left wing media piling on him. As well as massive voter fraud, corrupted electronic voting machines, illegal aliens voting in mass amoung many other devises of the progressives movement. Romney may not be perfect but this election was determined before it even happened and the people have been given many spins to explain it. You choose your spin if you like. And as the video on a different thread stated, this administration has overrid an amendment going back to 1948 and given themselves the authority to use propaganda on its citizens in any form that they see fit.

                With an education in actual history many citizens who you want to ridicule as neoconservatives who don't want change, in reality know what the Progressives change is all about. The examples in Russia, Germany, Italy, Cuba, China and countless other nations in the past have all resulted in mass murder, starvation, loss of freedom, and economic collapse. How wise is it to "PROGRESS" into this again? And if you think these people that are trying to take over this nation now are any different in the least, then it is your own lack of perception and proper education that must be to blame. The Progressives will take us to a one world government, but not before millions of people die first.
                You guys crack me up. I believe there was smear campaigns on both sides. Its funny that you think Romney ran a clean campaign.
                Haters don't really hate you, in fact they hate themselves because you are a reflection of what they wish to be.

                Comment

                • mudslinger47
                  Banned
                  • May 2007
                  • 3452

                  #23
                  Romney not answering the charges from the obummer administration probably cost him the election. I know his reasoning, didn't want to get called a racist for pickin on the Black guy. And I'll guarentee they would have used it, cause they used it on Hilary....

                  Comment

                  • LITE-INN
                    Banned
                    • Feb 2008
                    • 12473

                    #24
                    Originally posted by ss12 View Post
                    Romney didn't spend a Billion? Romney lost because they didn't stay on track with unemployement. The republicans did an excellent job of getting off track and brought of a topic that most undeucated voter don't understand. Benghazi. The democrated media kept it on the air waves and the republicans kept it up. Then the perfect storm Sandy came. All of this and guess what Obama won. And you guys are still talking about it and everybody else has forgotten about it. Thats what happen when you are an old white guy. Stuck in time and not willing to change.
                    he lost because of who he is and didn't fit I with the Hispanics

                    Comment

                    • mudslinger47
                      Banned
                      • May 2007
                      • 3452

                      #25
                      Originally posted by LITE-INN View Post
                      he lost because of who he is and didn't fit I with the Hispanics
                      I disagree, he is was a positive force. the Hispanics weren't going to vote for him, not at all, not now, not then, not in ten years. It just isn't going to happen. Remember, you can't beat free...

                      Comment

                      • LITE-INN
                        Banned
                        • Feb 2008
                        • 12473

                        #26
                        Originally posted by buschytreats
                        You're in a party full of chickenhawks. Get used to it.
                        what happened did cook co let you out for the weekend

                        Comment

                        • LITE-INN
                          Banned
                          • Feb 2008
                          • 12473

                          #27
                          Originally posted by mudslinger47 View Post
                          I disagree, he is was a positive force. the Hispanics weren't going to vote for him, not at all, not now, not then, not in ten years. It just isn't going to happen. Remember, you can't beat free...
                          that s what I said he was not a fit

                          Comment

                          • mudslinger47
                            Banned
                            • May 2007
                            • 3452

                            #28
                            Originally posted by LITE-INN View Post
                            that s what I said he was not a fit
                            Ya know, for where we are in history, I thought he was a great, almost perfect fit. We needed someone that was capable of steering the ship. I believe he was that person for "that" job. Now for the rest of his politics, I didn't care because the most important to me was righting the country. But alas, we'll never know, will we...

                            Ya may not have liked him, but atleast he was honest, unlike who we ended up with.

                            Comment

                            • LITE-INN
                              Banned
                              • Feb 2008
                              • 12473

                              #29
                              Originally posted by mudslinger47 View Post
                              Ya know, for where we are in history, I thought he was a great, almost perfect fit. We needed someone that was capable of steering the ship. I believe he was that person for "that" job. Now for the rest of his politics, I didn't care because the most important to me was righting the country. But alas, we'll never know, will we...

                              Ya may not have liked him, but atleast he was honest, unlike who we ended up with.
                              he couldn't of done any worse

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X