Negative 16.8% of unemployment insurance

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • backspace
    Senior Member
    • May 2007
    • 984

    #1

    Negative 16.8% of unemployment insurance

    Thank you OBAMA for taking 16.8% of my unemployment check without any notice,,,,,How about I take 16.8% of your retirement,,you no good SOB,,Oh also,,no more extensions for un employment after Dec 31,,,,Think I will go on public aid...
    We build fast race cars,,not race cars fast!
  • Clayton_Wetter
    Banned
    • May 2007
    • 16671

    #2
    He giveth (for your vote) and now he taketh away!

    Comment

    • LITE-INN
      Banned
      • Feb 2008
      • 12473

      #3
      wait till obama care kicks in

      Comment

      • Clayton_Wetter
        Banned
        • May 2007
        • 16671

        #4
        For sure! He's not near through "taketh" awaying!

        Comment

        • Spongebob
          Senior Member
          • Jun 2007
          • 169

          #5
          Lost all mine. Due to the "sequestor" I was "ineligible" for a extension.

          Comment

          • Clayton_Wetter
            Banned
            • May 2007
            • 16671

            #6
            Wow, they are blaming it on the sequester? This is likely yet another political lie to redirect blame on someone else to make themselves look good again.

            Comment

            • t.nie
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2008
              • 1146

              #7
              Obama was against sequester. Kind of funny how you immediately blame the person you personally hate without stopping for a moment and realizing the guy was on your side. The sequester was supposed to be so harmful that it would bring the Teabillies and Republicans to their senses before they hurt someone.

              The only thing Obama did wrong was misjudge just how truly ignorant, blind and compassionless the right wing freak show really is. If you voted "TeaBillie" in the last couple elections, then take what you get, you voted for it.

              I'm also surprised that Terry is on here in apparent support of people getting government aid. Oh wait... he gets those checks each month too, so he isn't going to be too vocal about cutting his own income. Makes sense. People think cutting government spending is great when the cuts only affect "the other guy" but when they actually hit home and it's your income getting cut, then its a different story. You want your "benefit you paid for and are entitled to" but when other people get help its "welfare queen."
              Last edited by t.nie; 09-13-2013, 09:05 AM.

              Comment

              • LITE-INN
                Banned
                • Feb 2008
                • 12473

                #8

                Comment

                • LITE-INN
                  Banned
                  • Feb 2008
                  • 12473

                  #9
                  http://www.fool.com/investing/genera...0-billion.aspx betcha my brother who works at boeing for 30 years is not to happy

                  Comment

                  • Clayton_Wetter
                    Banned
                    • May 2007
                    • 16671

                    #10
                    Originally posted by t.nie View Post
                    Obama was against sequester. Kind of funny how you immediately blame the person you personally hate without stopping for a moment and realizing the guy was on your side. The sequester was supposed to be so harmful that it would bring the Teabillies and Republicans to their senses before they hurt someone.

                    The only thing Obama did wrong was misjudge just how truly ignorant, blind and compassionless the right wing freak show really is. If you voted "TeaBillie" in the last couple elections, then take what you get, you voted for it.

                    I'm also surprised that Terry is on here in apparent support of people getting government aid. Oh wait... he gets those checks each month too, so he isn't going to be too vocal about cutting his own income. Makes sense. People think cutting government spending is great when the cuts only affect "the other guy" but when they actually hit home and it's your income getting cut, then its a different story. You want your "benefit you paid for and are entitled to" but when other people get help its "welfare queen."
                    You need to move to San Francisco. There are plenty of radical leftist whackos out there to share your anger with. How anyone with actual intelligence can buy into the Marxist con game and lies like you do is beyond me. I don't understand it.

                    Comment

                    • mudslinger47
                      Banned
                      • May 2007
                      • 3452

                      #11
                      DAng T, I thought you were smarter then that....It was obummers sequester, through and through, his administrations idea and played out through the rules they wrote....

                      Congressional Republicans, for their part, have said that the White House originally proposed the sequester - House Speaker John Boehner has dubbed it the "Obamaquester." They point to reporting from the Washington Post's Bob Woodward, who has described how then-White House budget director Jack Lew and legislative liaison Rob Nabors hatched the idea of a trigger - a delayed-onset package that would ostensibly force Congress to reach an agreement on the budget - during the height of dramatic negotiations on raising the federal debt ceiling during the summer of 2011.

                      Comment

                      • skids
                        Senior Member
                        • May 2007
                        • 1003

                        #12
                        Originally posted by t.nie View Post
                        Obama was against sequester. Kind of funny how you immediately blame the person you personally hate without stopping for a moment and realizing the guy was on your side. The sequester was supposed to be so harmful that it would bring the Teabillies and Republicans to their senses before they hurt someone.

                        The only thing Obama did wrong was misjudge just how truly ignorant, blind and compassionless the right wing freak show really is. If you voted "TeaBillie" in the last couple elections, then take what you get, you voted for it.

                        I'm also surprised that Terry is on here in apparent support of people getting government aid. Oh wait... he gets those checks each month too, so he isn't going to be too vocal about cutting his own income. Makes sense. People think cutting government spending is great when the cuts only affect "the other guy" but when they actually hit home and it's your income getting cut, then its a different story. You want your "benefit you paid for and are entitled to" but when other people get help its "welfare queen."
                        Buying the liberal lies again Tnie?

                        Even the Whitehouse spokesman, Jay Carny admits it originated in the Whitehouse.

                        Comment

                        • t.nie
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2008
                          • 1146

                          #13
                          Originally posted by t.nie View Post
                          Obama was against sequester. Kind of funny how you immediately blame the person you personally hate without stopping for a moment and realizing the guy was on your side. The sequester was supposed to be so harmful that it would bring the Teabillies and Republicans to their senses before they hurt someone.

                          The only thing Obama did wrong was misjudge just how truly ignorant, blind and compassionless the right wing freak show really is. If you voted "TeaBillie" in the last couple elections, then take what you get, you voted for it.
                          Ok, people. READ what I wrote.

                          1. Obama was against sequester.

                          Here are quotes from him the day he signed the bill into law.

                          "This is not a win for anybody," Obama lamented in a statement to reporters after the meeting. "This is a loss for the American people."

                          "It is absolutely true that this is not going to precipitate the crisis" that would have been caused by the so-called fiscal cliff, Obama said. "But people are going to be hurt. The economy will not grow as quickly as it would have. Unemployment will not go down as quickly as it would have. And there are lives behind that. And it's real."

                          2. The sequester was supposed to be so harmful that it would bring the Teabillies and Republicans to their senses before they hurt someone.

                          After weeks of outlining the dire impacts of the cuts, the President continued to soften his warning. While insisting the “pain” will be real, he admitted “not everybody is going to feel it. Not everybody’s going to feel it all at once.”

                          “This is not going to be an apocalypse, I think as some people have said. It’s just dumb. And it’s going to hurt. It’s going to hurt individual people, and it’s going to hurt the economy overall,” he concluded.

                          3. The only thing Obama did wrong was misjudge just how truly ignorant, blind and compassionless the right wing freak show really is. If you voted "TeaBillie" in the last couple elections, then take what you get, you voted for it.

                          The president admitted that House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, has “challenges in his caucus.” Read "the teabillies are out of control" in that line, cuz that's exactly what he's saying, that is exactly the situation, and everyone with any common sense at all knows it.

                          “I recognize that it’s very hard for Republican leaders to be perceived as making concessions to me,” he said. “Sometimes I reflect, you know, is there something else I could do to make these guys — I’m not talking about the leaders now, but maybe some of the House Republican caucus members — not paint horns on my head?”

                          Now who in the heck do you think he means when he says some of the "House Republican Caucus" paints horns on his head? Why, say hello, Teabillies!

                          In the future, read what I write, try your bestest to comprehend it before shooting off your mouths and making yourselves look stupid. Obama was not in favor of it, it was supposed to be such a horrible idea that it would not get passed, even in the debates he said there was no way Congress could be so foolish as to pass the sequester, and Presto! As if by magic, it passes with majority Republican (read Tea Billy Brigade) support. The Republicans own the dam thing as much if nor more than Obama, they passed it, they refuse to come up with a better alternative, they shoot down any proposal that includes revenue so we get stuck with a crappy idea that was only offered up as a deterrent or bargaining tool, not a serious proposal.

                          Go figure. Now ya'll go back to watching Fox and listening to the GOP spin machine, because we all know it doesn't matter to you what is really happening or what the teabillies are really doing, all that matters to you is what they TELL you to think.
                          Last edited by t.nie; 09-17-2013, 10:16 PM.

                          Comment

                          • t.nie
                            Senior Member
                            • Aug 2008
                            • 1146

                            #14
                            And one for the road- John Boy Boehner fessing up that Obama didn't want the sequester cuts... He actually does manage to tell the truth when painted into a corner occasionally....



                            Pay special attention to the way that Boehner weasels the blame onto Obama.."We have these cuts because of his demands...""

                            Know what those demands were? Raise some tax revenue from the Romneys, the Kochs of this nation. That was all. Just raise some revenue along with the cuts and we don't do sequester.

                            Guess what Boehner and the Tea Billies demanded? You guessed it. No Compromise. No Negotiation. Cut and that's it. Screw you and the horse you rode in on, Obammer, our buddies in the Billionaire Boys Club aint paying nothin!

                            So we have sequester. Yahoo. But please, tune back into Farce News now and get your daily dose of BULLSHAT and Grand Old Propaganda, give your brains their daily wash n rinse.
                            Last edited by t.nie; 09-17-2013, 10:25 PM.

                            Comment

                            • t.nie
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2008
                              • 1146

                              #15
                              And just to make this perfectly clear, because it is very apparent that many of you are not capable of thinking deeper than a bumper sticker slogan, Yes, the Sequester originated with the administration as a TOOL to bring the Republicans and Tea Billies to the bargaining table by attempting to propose something so horribly egregious there was NO WAY they would pass it.... Which is EXACTLY what Obama said in the debates.

                              WOW! He was so FREAKING wrong about the stupidity of the people he was dealing with. No doubt he just sat back and thought to himself "I just cannot believe these people are so darn hateful and stupid and unreasonable that they will pass the dumbest idea in the world to spite me, but by golly, they just went and did it. Now I get to sign the stupid thing. Fan freakin' tastic."

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X