A Cure For Capitakism

[Clayton_Wetter]

This is about as close to an "argument" against the idea presented as we will see.

Of course, the first sentence claims "honest educated opinions and websites that are informative and spot on."

Ok. I will give you honest. Educated? Not so much. Websites that are informative? Well, granted, there is what can be called "information" on those websites, but you really stretch it when you say "spot on."

The problem is I research who runs websites, who they get their funding from and you consistently post links to known right wing agitator websites known for right wing propaganda and their intent to deceive and misinform the public. A great deal of what you think is true is carefully crafted misinformation using a few facts and a lot of conservative spin.

My opinion of your sources, based on research and analyses, is where you mostly get your news from is definitely biased and certainly not without a right wing agenda. Basically, those sites are serving people like you with stories and "news" that just reinforces your existing world view.

For more, do some research on "world view," so you understand the concept of a person's world view, how it is formed, how it influences what you will accept as truth, and then go do some digging into a Ted Talk that was given that reported how the web and search engines now use your past searches and favorite websites you frequent to consistently provide you with content you will find agreeable.

That's right. If I type in "deficit reduction" in my Google search bar, I will get a completely different set of results than if you type it in yours. Why? Because I go to multiple different types of media sites frequently, and my search results are tailored based on what I have clicked on in the past. Yours the same. So if you only go to right wing propaganda sites, then all you are going to get when you search GOOGLE is a list of right wing propaganda sites all telling you the same thing.

Convincing you yours is the popular view nationally or globally, when all your searches are doing is telling you what you want to hear, which coincides with your existing world view. The only way to get multiple perspectives is to trick the machine by going to all kinds of sites, both right, left and middle frequently. That way, when you search a subject, you get all kinds of different perspectives, not just a narrowed selection based on your personal preference.

Yes, GOOGLE has been tailored to tell you what you want to hear, not what is most popular nationally or globally or even anything that might be offensive to you. That is a dangerous place to be, I think, only being told what you want to hear.

Mr. Tnie the Socialist Guy, guess what? I don't "GOOGLE" anything. I'm not a fan of Google as they are in bed with the left also. In fact they aid the government in the reaping of personal information from the very people that use the sight. They also were involved in helping bring the Arab Spring about.

As I have said before, your ultra far left mind set does not fit what most people in this country want and believe in. It is people like you that are fuel to the fire of Communism.

[Bubstr]

Mr. Tnie the Socialist Guy, guess what? I don't "GOOGLE" anything. I'm not a fan of Google as they are in bed with the left also. In fact they aid the government in the reaping of personal information from the very people that use the sight. They also were involved in helping bring the Arab Spring about.

As I have said before, your ultra far left mind set does not fit what most people in this country want and believe in. It is people like you that are fuel to the fire of Communism.

What most of the people wanted for the last two presidential elections was anyone but the republican. Not saying they got a good deal.

[LITE-INN]

no only certian. percentage that voted and so msny were mislesd

[Bubstr]

no only certian. percentage that voted and so msny were mislesd

Waah Waah Waah We would have won IF.
If you didn't estrange well over half the voters. Losing that last election was like screwing up a one cow cattle drive.

[Clayton_Wetter]

What most of the people wanted for the last two presidential elections was anyone but the republican. Not saying they got a good deal.

Do you really believe that any of the last several elections were actually the peoples choice?

[Bubstr]

Do you really believe that any of the last several elections were actually the peoples choice?

It was for the ones that cared enough to vote. And don't give me that stuff about gerrymandering. If we didn't have that, we might be able to get rid of both crap parties.

[LITE-INN]

Waah Waah Waah We would have won IF.If you didn't estrange well over half the voters. Losing that last election was like screwing up a one cow cattle drive.

I wonder hoe the vote outcome would've been if the dem was chinese indian either etc etc and if rommney was not mormon how the outcome would've been

[LITE-INN]

This is about as close to an "argument" against the idea presented as we will see.Of course, the first sentence claims "honest educated opinions and websites that are informative and spot on."Ok. I will give you honest. Educated? Not so much. Websites that are informative? Well, granted, there is what can be called "information" on those websites, but you really stretch it when you say "spot on."The problem is I research who runs websites, who they get their funding from and you consistently post links to known right wing agitator websites known for right wing propaganda and their intent to deceive and misinform the public. A great deal of what you think is true is carefully crafted misinformation using a few facts and a lot of conservative spin.My opinion of your sources, based on research and analyses, is where you mostly get your news from is definitely biased and certainly not without a right wing agenda. Basically, those sites are serving people like you with stories and "news" that just reinforces your existing world view.For more, do some research on "world view," so you understand the concept of a person's world view, how it is formed, how it influences what you will accept as truth, and then go do some digging into a Ted Talk that was given that reported how the web and search engines now use your past searches and favorite websites you frequent to consistently provide you with content you will find agreeable.That's right. If I type in "deficit reduction" in my Google search bar, I will get a completely different set of results than if you type it in yours. Why? Because I go to multiple different types of media sites frequently, and my search results are tailored based on what I have clicked on in the past. Yours the same. So if you only go to right wing propaganda sites, then all you are going to get when you search GOOGLE is a list of right wing propaganda sites all telling you the same thing. Convincing you yours is the popular view nationally or globally, when all your searches are doing is telling you what you want to hear, which coincides with your existing world view. The only way to get multiple perspectives is to trick the machine by going to all kinds of sites, both right, left and middle frequently. That way, when you search a subject, you get all kinds of different perspectives, not just a narrowed selection based on your personal preference.Yes, GOOGLE has been tailored to tell you what you want to hear, not what is most popular nationally or globally or even anything that might be offensive to you. That is a dangerous place to be, I think, only being told what you want to hear.

hey big guy can you see whats wrong with this statement http://money.cnn.com/2008/12/31/tech...ivacy.fortune/

[Bubstr]

I wonder hoe the vote outcome would've been if the dem was chinese indian either etc etc and if rommney was not mormon how the outcome would've been

The republican party had a gimmie and screwed it up. First Ron Paul had a large following and they ignored him. They didn't even give him a chance to speak at the convention. Pissed them people off. Then Rommbey pissed of 47% of the people with his campaign dinner speech. Romney being Wall St hurt him more than being a Mormon. The republicans have a narcissistic streak, they think everyone likes what they do. They need to get in touch with the public. Just how many people can you piss off and win a election?

[LITE-INN]

ron paul is a whacko what 47 percent really nowand obummer got in because urbanites came out in groves to vote for him

[Bubstr]

ron paul is a whacko what 47 percent really nowand obummer got in because urbanites came out in groves to vote for him

I see your still pissing off the Ron Paul sector. Proved my point. Thank you.

[Bubstr]

I see someone decided I needed a red star for this thread. Thank you, I'll wear it as a badge of courage. LOL


Thread: A Cure For Capitakism

f'n garbage
11-01-2013 07:30 PM

[LITE-INN]

no ron paul is a whacko

[Bubstr]

no ron paul is a whacko

Your the whacko if you think Romney could win with out the Paul supporters.

Other than FOX news telling you he was a whacko, just what did you disagree with? Was it he thought we spent too much on defense, entitlements or that he would rather see earmarks than discresionary spending? Was it because he was against the FED and marginal reserve banking? Was it because he was against large undisclosed campaign contributions? Was it because he was in favor of leaving education, abortion and gay rights among other things to the States? Was it because he thought we where spending too much to enforce drug laws on marijuana? Was it because he was against illegal immigration?

[Bubstr]

No one has commented on this link in this post. The most powerful thing on earth. Compound interest. Mo Gold bugs?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFDe5kUUyT0